Chapter 31: Anti-Blackness
(barrage:) "MD, the most annoying Virgin (that English version)." ”
"Those who don't know the whole picture and persuade you to be kind, can you stay away!"
"Convince people with virtue today, and tomorrow he will dare to kick his nose in the face. It's the first time to be a human being, why let others. ”
"If Brother Zheng knew that he had been cyberbullied because of his active rights protection, it is estimated that it would not be Meng Jiangnu who cried and destroyed the Great Wall, but our Brother Zheng."
"If it doesn't snow, it won't show Brother Zheng's grievances and depression."
"I went all the way through sociology research, but I didn't expect to be able to find paper materials by watching a live broadcast. Not to mention, the title of the paper is "Talking about the Development History and Impact of Cyberbullying in Combination with Ancient Cases in China". ”
[Here I will once again express my great puzzlement about Childe Fusu's bewildering behavior. Your dad has been deceived by others, why do you still speak for those warlocks? How can you turn your elbow out?! 】
"Help, the son in my heart, Fusu, is as gentle as jade, why is he becoming more and more like a disobedient bear child?" ”
"The anchor is also in a more exaggerated tone here, don't take it seriously. However, Fusu was indeed assigned to Shangjun because of the disagreement between the first emperor and the first emperor on the matter of burning books and pit Confucianism. ”
Shangjun, Fusu heard that he was talking about himself in the sky, and he was a little difficult to accept for a while.
He has studied Confucian classics since he was a child, and knows that he should treat others with benevolence and righteousness, why does this Tianmu actually say that he has done wrong?
He had always wondered, could it be that his father had done something wrong, and as a son, he should be watching from the sidelines? Or flattery like everyone else?
After he was sent to Upper County by his father, he always insisted that he was doing the right thing.
However, after listening to Tianmu's analysis, he doubted his approach for the first time.
Did the father really do something wrong?
[Don't talk about this big grievance, let's go back to Confucianism. The main attitude of later generations towards this matter is to accuse, accusing the First Emperor of killing Confucian students, making China's Confucian classics almost lost, and being a sinner in the history of civilization. 】
Nobles of the Six Kingdoms: "Otherwise?!" I'd like to see how you speak for him this time. ”
[In fact, speaking of which, friends who don't have any major problems in their brains should be able to find something wrong.]
Who only killed more than 400 people in a cultural monopoly? What can more than 400 people do? Why, only these 400 people in Xianyang City in the whole country understand Confucianism? It's such a coincidence that if these 400 people are gone, Confucianism will not be able to pass on? Let's just say don't be ridiculous. 】
The nobles of the Six Kingdoms who have just spoken: ......
Is Tianmu scolding them for being brainless?
Several Confucian scholars in Ludi couldn't sit still at all after hearing this: "What's wrong with the four hundred? Even if Qin Yingzheng only killed one Confucian student, it would be contempt for the Confucian classics! Such people are not worthy of forgiveness! ”
(barrage:) "Yo, I actually found a plot bug. ”
"The lines of your atmosphere group are not professional enough, I know that anyone who goes into the live broadcast room to have fun knows that the anchor has just said that the trap and killing of Confucian students is because they violated Qin law by abducting and deceiving them."
"Shandong Xiaolu": "Don't mention any Qin laws to me, this kind of scourge of the people should not exist." The state does not need the law, and the people need to be governed by righteousness and virtue! ”
"It's not that I said, this speech is too punishing."
"It's too hard, you can even say this kind of thing in order to create an atmosphere."
"One is going to step on the sewing machine, and the other is going to build a heavenly umbrella, Bashi."
[The anchor saw a speech from a friend whose ID was Confucian in the live broadcast room.] I know you're in a hurry, but don't worry about it yet. Don't be in a hurry and scold the wrong person, it will be embarrassing. 】
The scholar from Ludi was a little confused, and he didn't know what the day was talking about.
Isn't it a sure thing that Qin Shi Huang burned books and pit Confucianism, is there still a turning point?
Tianmu shouldn't be talking nonsense with his eyes open in order to shoot that tyrant's ass.
[First of all, there has never been a record in the "Historical Records" that Qin Shi Huang killed Confucianism. It is recorded in the "Qin Shi Huang Benji" that "there are more than 460 people who have violated the ban", which is very clear, and those who are killed in the pit are all those who violate the ban. If you break the law, you won't deal with them? There's a reason for these wicked people to behave indiscriminately, right?!
The friend who opposed the law above, you might as well give me an example, let me see whose emperor is so kind-hearted and broad-minded, and can still treat them with kind words and courtesy in the face of reactionaries who maliciously smear themselves and disturb social peace and stability?
If you don't dispose of them according to the law, will it be possible to pinch their legs? What's the trouble?
You should be tough when dealing with this kind of person, they are all scoundrels, what face do you give them?!
Also, it is also very clear in the "Historical Records: The Biography of Confucianism": "Burn poetry books, pit warlocks". Do you hear me? What is the pit? It's the warlock who pits! Why are you Confucian scholars coming to claim it so shitty?
Taking 10,000 steps back, Hou Sheng and Lu Sheng are indeed Confucian students, but were they killed because of their identities? They were killed by a trap of their own accord. The calculations of the abduction and deception are all counted on the emperor's head, they really think that they have a long life, and they are looking for excitement here. You Confucian scholars have to brush up on your sense of existence at this time, do you?
Or is it that because you can't find the fault of the First Emperor, you can only fabricate one at will?
He burns books, he digs pits, and he has done something wrong, but we should also judge a person's merits and demerits objectively and rationally, instead of fabricating and distorting facts and confusing the public.
Because Qin Shi Huang ordered the burning of books, the six arts were lost? All I can say is that I can't rule it out, but don't forget, there's another reckless man after that!
"The burning of books is not the crime of Lis, but the crime of the book"
Xiang Yu set fire to the entire Xianyang Palace, and none of you said a word, right?! A fire, how many collections, how many crafts, and how many cultural heritages are gone, you should not be able to see it, right?!
Here, it is recommended that the person who refutes it go to the hospital to hang up the ophthalmology department to see what this selective blindness is all about. By the way, check your mental state as well, and don't just come out and harm people. 】
Xiang Yu didn't expect that this would have his own business, although he was still young, but he could hear from the canopy that he had actually burned down the tyrant's palace, and he suddenly felt very proud, and even his voice was about to his tail.
"Is it necessary for the tyrant's thing to exist? Even if I don't set it on fire, I'll definitely destroy everything inside! ”
[Good guy, you really have a double standard, right? Qin Shi Huang's burning of the history books of the Six Kingdoms is tyrannical and unreasonable, and Xiang Yu burned Xianyang Palace is the teacher of justice? With your cognitive ability, how are you embarrassed to stand on the moral high ground and judge others?
Or did when the First Emperor ordered the burning of books, everyone secretly took out the Tao Te Ching at home and chewed it raw? So moral! 】