A leader who can help the masses realize the individual ideals of the masses is a good leader in the hearts of the people.

Good leadership in the hearts of the people is not necessarily good leadership at the macro level, at the collective level, on the time scale.

The leadership has only the macro situation development in mind, only the collective goal, and ignores the needs of the people. Except for a very small number of people who are "sensible" or who have a relationship with the leaders, the vast majority of the rest of the masses do not buy collective accounts.

"I serve the collective, who serves me? What do I get? ”

It seems that the above is always tossing around there, without considering personal development at all.

This kind of thinking seems to have always been popular among all ages, and it makes no sense to criticize the guiding ideology of the upper class, which is unanimous, so what is meaningful? Own development makes sense.

In that case, a thousand masses have a thousand meanings, and what is meaningful to you is meaningless to me.

Just kidding, take your studies as an example, you have been admitted to graduate school and realized the meaning of your life, what does it have to do with me.

Of course, if you want to take the same major, the same tutor, and the same group, because your number is full, I didn't recruit you. Then what you mean to me is simply the most unmeaningful thing in the world.

So, if the meaning is reduced to the individual level, it is meaningless. Meaning at the collective level is meaning, but now it seems that the collective meaning is like a stumbling block instead of promoting the group for the masses to realize their individual ideals.

This is because the masses do not have a sense of collective belonging, just like the previous excellent class collective, many people have great resistance

"This evaluates this excellent class collective, and it is of some use to the squad leader, and at most to you class cadres, but what is the use of us people? Tired and tired of rehearsing, sick. ”

Therefore, although some collective meanings are realized by the masses, the distribution of interests is uneven, and such collective meanings are egoism clothed in everyone's thoughts in the eyes of the masses. In such a state of thought, the more "responsible" the organizers look after each link, the more disgusted the masses become

"Don't mess around, okay."

Therefore, a good leader must first have a good collective significance, so that the collective meaning and the development of the masses are in harmony. This is to win the hearts of the people, as long as they win the hearts of the people, even if they do not have to fulfill their duties, the masses will push the leaders to go, and when the meaning is realized, the masses cheer

"What a good leader"

Therefore, the most crucial ability of a good leader is to combine the macro significance with the mass significance, and the masses are already very happy. If the goal fails to convince the masses at the beginning, it is to be a dog of the masses, and the masses will also feel that they are using everyone to achieve the leader's personal goal and kick the leader away

"Don't suffer Lao Tzu"