After experiencing a wave of aging work department communication methods.

When there was no class, Li Jinglin went to the studio of "Imperial Tomb".

Meet the creative team.

Didn't talk about work either.

It's just a meal, gossip and mingle.

The next communication work, big and small, can basically be solved by remote video conference discussion or private video communication.

No, there won't really be people who don't use the network and run business back and forth with their legs!

Time passes slowly.

Li Jinglin's work is also on the right track.

According to the content of the documentary, we began to study the details in detail and produce a soundtrack for the content.

this day.

Li Jinglin comes to school every day.

Give a big lesson to undergraduate students.

"These are the basic functions of music."

While systematically explaining the function of music, a student suddenly raised his hand and asked.

"Teacher, you talked a lot about the function of music, but why didn't you talk about criticism?"

The rest of the classmates raised their heads.

As a matter of fact.

In a cultural class for music majors.

There will be some analysis of the classics.

And among these works, there will naturally be a lot of operas, musicals, title music, great composers, who can often give it a critical nature.

When students are studying, sometimes they look at the analysis of the work, and they will also analyze the content of the work in terms of criticism.

And it just so happened.

Li Jinglin's class is exactly the subject that he had talked to the professors in the department before.

[Modern, digital, and focus on cultivating students' thinking about the relationship between music and cultural and social issues.] 】

Sociology of Contemporary Music

As a matter of fact.

The sociology of music has been around for a long time.

It's just that there are a lot of arguments.

For example, humanistic thought, the foundations of sociology, etc., is an interdisciplinary discipline based on the branches of sociology or musicology.

It's just that these things taught by Li Jinglin are slightly different from this.

It stands to reason.

Such a discipline.

It is also necessary to describe the critical nature of musical works and the impact on society.

or whether society will affect some of the value orientation in musical works.

However, when Li Jinglin mentioned his functions, he did not mention this at all.

"This classmate asked a very good question."

Li Jinglin smiled slightly.

He replied earnestly.

"Music, not critical!"

The students looked at each other.

I started to get confused.

"In fact, music is a carrier that can carry culture and thoughts, which is indeed true, but you must know that these things do not belong to music in essence, but to philosophy or literature."

"Music itself is not critical, but music is!"

Speaking of which.

Li Jinglin smiled slightly.

"Music is an abstract art with four social functions: cognitive, educational, aesthetic, and practical."

"Music is a tool for aesthetic adjustment, which can greatly amplify the emotional factor, and can amplify the emotion, and has the function of aesthetic attributes, which can serve literary ideas well!"

"Yes, the criticality of musical works comes from literature, and in musical works, music is a carrier of literary content, a different form of expression."

All the students were stunned.

I couldn't help but nod my head again and again.

With this explanation, many things become clear.

In the past, it was indeed inevitable to memorize texts and read dead books for exams.

Say.

XX's XX works are very classic and must be examined.

Naturally, then, many students will start looking at all sorts of analyses.

But sometimes it's easier to lose sight of the essence.

When the student asked, Li Jinglin answered.

A lot of the context is clear.

For example, some of the more obvious carrying methods are best understood.

For example, operas, musicals, or songs.

It's all with lyrics.

I want to be critical.

It's basically all about the lyrics.

In such a situation, music is the carrier of literature.

And some are less obvious

For example, the famous violin piece, "Liang Zhu", uses a very romantic expression to describe the tragedy caused by arranged marriage, which is critical.

Though.

This violin concerto has no lyrics.

But behind it, there is a whole "folklore story" or "literary work" content that takes on the role.

It is a kind of "use of music to express literary content".

In the final analysis, it is literature that is critical, not music itself.

"Okay teacher, I understand."

I saw that my classmates understood.

Li Jinglin nodded.

Continue to start the lecture.

Originally.

This is just a small episode that happened in a lesson.

It doesn't seem to have any effect.

After finishing the lesson, Li Jinglin returned to the piano room.

After taking the two apprentices to practice.

Then he began to "touch the fish".

It is said to be fishing, but in fact, it is also for work.

The TV series "Three-Body Problem" led by a factory also officially started filming some time ago.

Li Jinglin, who got the news of the shooting.

Naturally, I am also working on the soundtrack of "Imperial Tomb", as well as using my leisure time to start reading books in advance in addition to normal classes.

Look at the three parts of "The Three-Body Problem".

The first time, when I watched it, I was shocked by the excitement of the plot and the richness of imagination.

However, Li Jinglin, who has seen it for the second time, gradually discovered the core of some problems.

Thinking back to some of the lectures I had in class today, I began to be a little silent.

The problem arises in this criticality.

Li Jinglin sighed slightly.

Through the phenomenon, we can see the essence.

Turn on the computer and browse through all kinds of comments about "The Three-Body Problem".

I saw one such problem in B.

#你认为 how good is "The Three-Body Problem"? #

I thought about it.

Li Jinglin did not hide.

Instead, he generously opened his account with identity authentication.

Begin to answer.

[Some people are amazed by Da Liu's imagination, and some are attracted by the grandeur and ups and downs of the plot, but from my personal point of view, I found that a large part of the reason for the success of "The Three-Body Problem" is based on its excellent criticism. 】

Yes.

Critical.

In class, the students were just taught, some questions about criticality.

At this time, watching "The Three-Body Problem" again, it seems that there is another perspective.

[What amazes me is that this kind of criticism is not just "criticism for the sake of criticism", it contains a lot of dialectical thinking, and the author's position and attitude are very objective and neutral, and the elaboration of the problem is very rational. 】

[Bai Mulin's conscience is extinguished, Ye Wenjie's super betrayal, and the dark battle of the four warships all depict the dark side of "people abandon their conscience in order to protect themselves at the moment of life and death, and even annihilate human nature". 】

[Just like the most charming character, Ye Wenjie, she is a victim, everything she does is actually understandable, but understanding does not mean forgiveness, she is also a character who cannot be forgiven. 】

[Da Liu's criticality often has the characteristics of objective rationality, and it can make people think. 】

[Although it is a very dark criticism, often, you will feel that his works coexist with despair and hope. 】

["Give civilization to the years, not to give civilization the years" "The worm has never been defeated", in addition to criticism, in fact, it can also be completely seen that Da Liu seems pessimistic, but in fact it is a hopeful thought. 】

Li Jinglin took a deep breath.

At this point, it seems that the comment has stopped.

In fact, what really moved Li Jinglin was more than that.

After hesitating for a moment, Li Jinglin shook his head.

And there was no continued comment.

Actually, in Li Jinglin's opinion.

A large part of the reason for the success of "The Three-Body Problem" is that he dares to really criticize it from an objective perspective.

This is a problem that is lacking in Chinese literature today.

It is precisely because of this that in recent years, there have been fewer and fewer heavyweight works in the literary world.

Either they dare not criticize, or rather, they dare not criticize the superstructure, and only dare to target their negative emotions at the common people.

Or, they are mindless critics for the sake of criticism, lack objectivity and rationality, and live a kind of pathological literary youth.

Li Jinglin thinks.

The reason why Chinese literature was incomparably brilliant in ancient times was because the literati of those years had the arrogance of not bowing their heads, the courage to face facts, morality, and adhere to the bottom line.

Therefore, the poems of the ancients are full of anger and arrogance.

can express his chest directly, "The official warehouse rat is as big as a fight, and he will not leave when he sees someone opening a position." The athletes have no food and the people are hungry, who will send the court into the king's mouth? You can also "The merchant girl doesn't know the hatred of the country, and she still sings the flowers in the backyard across the river", and she can also "look up to the sky and laugh and go out, how can my generation be a Penghao person"

Lacking arrogance and pride, and even not daring to scare the rat, how can he be open-minded and arrogant in the case of self-preservation?

The reason why a writer is a writer is that at least you have to be a little arrogant.

However, some of the so-called literati nowadays.

But he is full of bullying and afraid of hard.

In the face of problems, I dare not say it, but in the face of the common people, I have nothing to do, and I am still looking for a draw.

But what's the matter.

These words cannot be typed, pointed out, or said.

Because, there are too few people who can bring brains on the Internet.

If you dare to say these words, then there will definitely be a mentally retarded rhythm.

Anyway, it's either stupid or bad.

Today, Li Jinglin dares to comment like this.

Tomorrow the rhythm will be up.

Those who eat dog food can simply be crazy.

When the time comes, the bulls, ghosts, snakes, and gods who take quotes out of context, misinterpret the content, and engage in diodes must be full of streets.

Li Jinglin's original intention was.

In today's literature, some people are submissive to the real problems, but they attack the common people hard.

Those with ulterior motives are maliciously guiding in the name of criticism.

There needs to be some people who dare to stand up, be rational and objective, tell the truth, and solve problems.

But if you really say it yourself.

As long as a little bit of means are used, it will definitely be misinterpreted as "Li Jinglin instigated netizens to scold XX" and the like.

It's like weighing 100 catties and having 120 catties of backbone.

Nowadays, in the network of brainless and extremely easy to get caught up in two-dimensional arguments, the response to this is not good.

It can even be said to be extremely bad.

But it doesn't work if you don't say it.

People who can be rational are wise enough to protect themselves, and they don't dare to say more, so they shut up there.

The dog food was there in the name of "criticism".

Under such an atmosphere.

The blunt, but very objective and rational criticism of "The Three-Body Problem" with dialectical thinking is precious.

"Tut, sure enough, I don't dare to say it."

Pouted.

Li Jinglin smiled self-deprecatingly.

Of course.

Actually, it's not that I dare not say it.

It's just a matter of paying attention to the occasion.

These words, said by themselves, the weight is still not enough.

Moreover, it is not possible to spread such a controversial topic on the Internet in such an irresponsible manner.

But.

It doesn't mean you don't say it!

It is necessary to choose the right place and explain it in the right way, so as to cause positive development.

Immediately, Li Jinglin sorted out the content.

I plan to raise these issues on my own initiative at the next report meeting.

Yes.

It is absolutely impossible to talk about these problems casually among the people, because there will definitely be jackals who will come over when they smell it, and they are eager to make things as crooked as possible.

Moreover, that kind of behavior is also very similar to "not daring to admonish, only daring to complain to the people, and then causing controversy".

It's better to say it directly where it should be said, and be bold.

Other words

It is necessary to support real "cultural support" and "content encouragement".

Entertainment works in this aspect.

Content like this is needed.

Of course, content like this definitely needs to be done under strict control.

Otherwise.

The consequences will be very bad.

The person who stands up must be strong enough, so that he will not be misinterpreted by the bull, ghost, snake and god, and everything will become controllable.

The understanding of "education" is becoming more and more profound.

Li Jinglin has gradually matured in the way some ideas are conveyed.

How can netizens become rational?

This is a question that is almost unsolvable.

When a mask is put on, the darkness is often infinitely magnified.

You can't expect people who let themselves go to pay attention to their daily words and deeds on the Internet.

But.

It is completely possible to make netizens rational under specific topics.

The occasion, the timing, the person, and the order are all very important.

This is actually an alternative kind of "procedural justice".

If Li Jinglin ignores it and says anything on the Internet directly, then it will definitely cause a huge mess, and it will be difficult to end at that time, even if he is well-intentioned, he may have done something wrong.

However, with a slightly different approach, the matter will still be the same, but it will become very easy to implement and solve.

"Well, there are three months left until the next conference."

Li Jinglin nodded.

I have one more task.

Just right, you can also take advantage of this time.

These contents are systematically sorted out and summarized.

Since you are in such a position.

It is necessary to make some suggestions for the development and construction of entertainment.

(End of chapter)