At this second, there is something called thinking
(I) Reflections on Life
At this second, there is something called thinking. There is no reason to stop the movement of a brain cell, from the moment it touches the scene, and it has to think for survival, life and life. You may not know where the end is, or even where it is, but from the beginning you start a kind of endless imagination. We are trying to achieve that unknown end point, and we are constantly carrying out brain movements, a kind of thinking that is different from other animals.
What is survival for, a kind of perfection of life or an endless torture of life. I can't elevate myself to a completely artistic perspective, I just know that there is no way for my existence not to continue. Because my life does not come from my will, maybe I can do a complete analysis of my own life, but the result is still the same, I come from the multiplication of human beings, which I don't know whether it is human sorrow or happiness. Sadness is that one's own existence is for the sake of a life that does not come from one's own will, and happiness comes from the origin of life that can be achieved without going through oneself. Contradiction may be the simplest philosophy of survival, and complicating survival may be the simplest truth of survival. People who have moved away from simply using survival for the struggle between their lives begin to slowly complicate their own survival, and then survive in contradictions, perhaps this is the so-called survival!
From the first day of life, from the moment the brain cells have the ability to distinguish the things around them, life should be said to have a kind of judgment. The Buddha's talk of going to hell seems to be a great thought on the surface, but from another angle it also shows an irresponsible attitude towards one's own life, how can one ignore the value of one's own source of life, and simply die for the sake of other lives, this should also be a phenomenon of escaping life! What would the world be like if every living being had this way of thinking? I don't know, but at least it's certain that no one will ever have to go to hell again. Because the world is the world, heaven and hell no longer exist, so why go to hell! Dedicating one's life to those who ignore the value of life is not worth it, and what is the need for such an attitude. But such a person is worshipped as a saint, and I don't know whether he should really despise or really applaud such a person! Because at least I don't ignore my own life, and I don't need a Buddha to go to hell for me to get anything free!
The days when water and rice are contributed to the five organs every day, and the days when life can continue unconsciously become a way of survival are called life. Since it is a life, there should be qi to come out and qi to enter. One in and one out, creating generosity and stinginess. It's no wonder that usually generous people also have big bellies, but I don't know if those who use non-breathing breath to create a big belly are really generous, and people who can't have a big belly by breathing are really stingy! He was not in his position and did not dare to make any assertions, so like many people, he watched and listened to everything that happened around him. Perhaps at a certain moment, more or less breath is released, which also indicates that life with oneself will inevitably change for it, and life in the process of survival will make people bear a lot of things that should not be bearable, and slowly do not know whether to keep themselves in and out of a normal breath or reduce and increase the frequency of breathing. I can't be sure what I will do when I really encounter such a critical moment, but I know that I am a person who is contradictory to survive, and it is difficult to selfless dedication if I am not noble, and the only thing that is certain is that sometimes I will ignore the existence of life, and maybe I can't survive because of this, so I can't change my life.
(II) Thoughts on Love
I remember Mr. Ma Lao said: Reproduction is a natural attribute of human beings, just as lower animals also have cubs, and plants also have branches. Changing the nature of nature also changes the original genes that are life. Without the original genetic species, the final result is disappearance, and the so-called improvement is actually a cruel and violent means of disappearance of the species.
These simple truths are about to change in human beings, a primitive gene is changed, and then it is called "love", more people are now accustomed to using "LOVE" to be called, perhaps the strokes are relatively simple, and you can't see the relationship between the staggering Chinese characters that have been taught by the teacher since childhood as a stepping stone! Since the genes have been artificially changed, there is no way to control what they look like after the change. Some are as pure as ice crystals, some are as naked and shiny as coal, some are as turbid as the Yellow River, and of course, some are as plausible as rice water.
But sometimes it is really ridiculous, except for Plato, the madman, almost no one agrees that this so-called "love" is separate from the natural nature of man. Monks and nuns only follow the cultivation of pure heart and few desires, and there is no way to stipulate that the offender has no right to live as clearly as the Constitution! In other words, the beginning of the Buddha was only deceiving himself! Otherwise, how could the Buddha be reincarnated, could it be that he burst out of thin air like a monkey from a crack in the stone! If this is the case, then it is really simple, nothing to be tired and a group of people find a stone to sit on and everything will be fine, and it will also save the physical effort to make different chromosomes combine; Avoid enduring painful childbirth; There is no need to grow from a small cell to a few feet tall.
It may be okay to talk and laugh, but it is really just a natural attribute, and the reason why people are different from the lower animals in the so-called thinking is that there is no need to choose the initiator of reproduction? If you don't need it, it's a completely natural property, and if you need to, then the same thing is changing the natural nature of the species (I believe no one will deny that they are also one of the species), and the disappearance of the species actually starts from people themselves! The more ridiculous I feel when I think about it, and I have to continue this ridiculous change.