Sister Dai's voice said, "We always have to work a lot to make a little progress, and we are often threatened by rich and powerful people. But it won't knock us down, and we know we're doing the right thing – until we get to the end of the death penalty!

"Those people gave him cases of judicial miscarriages, and all the failures of justice in Shijie countries have been made up to now, and we agree with what they said, judges are not gods, and as long as there is a death penalty, people will be killed by mistake, so we must abolish the death penalty. 」

It's hard to connect this reason with the current broadness. No matter how you look at it, it is, "In short, I want to abolish the death penalty, and the death penalty is not allowed to be used under any circumstances." 」

"We started advocating for the abolition of the death penalty and we found it to be an international event. Leaders in many countries support the abolition of the death penalty. The upper-class people we met no longer put on a bad face when they saw us as they used to, they all smiled and thought of us as comrades.

"He thought it was proof that his years of hard work were finally being seen, that he deserved it, and that he refused to admit that it was only because he supported what those people supported. He shook hands with shijie experts who had crossed the ocean, he knew activists working all over shijie, and he had joined an organization that had a huge influence on all shijie!"

He is no longer a minor person who has no journalist to cover. He became part of a movement of great significance to Shijie.

"He gave lectures, held film exhibitions, translated books that could support the abolition of the death penalty, and used those people's funds to run activities everywhere, but he deliberately didn't read them, and the civilians who used to be most grateful to us now hate us. He used to say to the spicy government officials, 'You are all self-interested garbage. Now he is saying to those who mourn the killing of their families, 'You are violent maniacs full of hatred. 』

"Every time he was scolded by the public, he said that he was selfless, so he was right, but he couldn't give up his identity as a 'shijie-level sports activist'.

Sister Dai went on to talk about the impact of a case that was a key part of the abolitionist movement in her country.

Although his country has called for an independent judiciary like many countries, that only means that no matter how many people protest, they cannot change the judges' decisions. As for those who are usually good friends with the judge, it doesn't matter if they want to change the judge's whole values during dinner and chat, and then affect his verdict. It is even more irrelevant to further directly control the teaching content of the entire law department, so that the values of every legal person are manipulated and completely out of touch with society. It is absolutely irrelevant to put those who support the abolition of the death penalty in a high position in the judiciary, and then let him put pressure on those below him not to seek punishment or sentence the death penalty.

When a judge happily posed with a super-big man from a foreign abolitionist group, no one could question whether his verdict would be affected – very clearly, completely and thoroughly.

Since judges generally belong to the upper class, regardless of the country, judges who climb up from the bottom of society are either a minority or forget their origins after climbing up. The upper class only interacts with the upper class, and does not eat and chat with the common people, so the result of judicial independence is that the opinions of the people disappear in the judicial system and are replaced by the arbitrariness of the upper class.

The abolitionist movement, which has a beautiful signboard of the "Shijie-level social movement", has infiltrated the courts with the blessing of the "guarantee of being high enough" of the big names in various countries. Since the upper class will also try to promote only those who like to eat and chat like themselves, and press those who insist on standing on the side of the common people to the bottom of the judicial system, the more thoroughly the higher courts are infiltrated, the higher the probability of drawing lots to support the abolition of the death penalty.

As a result, a series of brutal murderers were exempted from the death penalty on grounds that could not be agreed with by a little reason, in accordance with the principles of "presumption of innocence" and "lesser suspicion" promoted by those who advocated abolition.

For example, the burglary killed the young wife of the owner of the house, not only did he return several times to loot his property, he attempted to steal the deposits, but also sexually assaulted the corpse and cooked the corpse, and the Supreme Court judge spared death on the grounds that his act of rape proved that he (despite having a girlfriend) loved the victim (and the relationship with him can only be said to be a stranger who was unilaterally harassed...... One can't help but wonder if if there was no rape of corpses and the crime process was not so inhuman, would the judge have sentenced him more heavily?

The criterion for "the prisoner is deeply remorseful and therefore gives him a chance to rehabilitate" has been changed from "obtaining forgiveness from the victim's family" to "obtaining forgiveness from the judge". As long as there is a daoqian in front of the judge (to the victim who is impossible to appear in court), it does not matter if the deceased is humiliated as soon as he walks out of the courthouse. In this way, the judge also thought that it was too strict, and it has become that as long as it is a living person, it does not matter if it threatens to kill all the survivors in court, and everyone has remorse. The judge thinks he may suddenly regret in the future, so it is assumed that he is remorseful. As to whether the judge is responsible for ensuring that he has absolutely no chance of carrying out his intimidation in the future, that is the responsibility of society, not the responsibility of the judge.

Since intentional homicide is one of the elements of the death penalty in this country, the judge changed the criteria for determining that it was intentional homicide. As long as there is a reason, whatever that reason may be, it counts as intentional homicide. For example, if you shoot a police officer in the head because you don't want to be caught by the police, this is to resist arrest and kill people, not to kill people. For example, because the victim struggled to rape the victim, he strangled the victim and abandoned the body in the wilderness, because he was afraid of being discovered, not for the purpose of killing. Say...... It is conceivable that even if you kill someone because you want to try the feeling of killing, you are not deliberately killing someone, but killing people just to experience the thrill.

Since serious circumstances are also one of the requirements for the death penalty, the number of criminal cases that are described as "serious" in the country's verdicts has decreased significantly, even though the crime rate has not decreased, the people have not slept at night, and various inhumane events have occurred repeatedly.

Because intellectual disability is one of the feasible reasons for mitigating the sentence, the number of criminal cases affirmed as "mentally handicapped" in the country has increased significantly, even though many murderers have made a plan in advance, are able to use tools correctly, lure victims to places where they cannot seek help, and are able to exonerate themselves with the police afterwards, and accurately assess the risks and profits and losses to choose the laws to be committed. Ibid. for insanity.

If none of the above works and the sentence is dead, the Supreme Court can also find ways to find fault with the prosecutor and get the case retried on the pretext of "flaws that can affect the sentencing". For example, if the prosecutor is asked to find out whether the prisoner wanted to kill the victim before taking the property? Or later? If he is sentenced to death again, the prosecutor is asked to find out next time that the prisoner used a dumbbell and an induction cooker to hit the victim's head, and which one is the one who killed the victim? If the prisoner is sentenced to death again, ask the prosecutor to check whether there is an ID card and an ATM card in the stolen property? and then ask the prosecutor to find out what is the "legal relationship" between theft and murder......

Various limerick poems appeared among the people. "The death penalty in the first instance, halved in the second instance, and the pig's foot noodles in the third instance. Pork knuckle noodles are usually eaten unharmed after a great upset.

Even if the death penalty is determined after successfully overcoming many difficulties, because all the "advanced" countries in Shijie demand the abolition of the death penalty, on the one hand, they will never put pressure on other countries to interfere in their internal affairs, and on the other hand, they say that if they do not abolish the death penalty, they will be suppressed in foreign affairs, economics, and other aspects, so the death row prisoners are all kept in prison cells with taxpayers' money. The government has abolished the death penalty.

That was when the abolitionist movement was most successful in the country. Although there are opponents in the country, and the majority of public opinion is on the side of opposition, the influence on policy is far less than that of those who support the abolition of the death penalty.

And then that case happened.

A man who couldn't find a job decided to commit a crime because he wanted to go to jail.

This is not an uncommon thing in my country, and it is not uncommon for people to deliberately commit crimes because they want to eat in prison, especially before the Chinese New Year. They would run to rob the store, with a knife in hand, but it looked like they were only going to cut fruit, and they didn't want to kill it. Because the purpose is to eat prison food, and there will be no money grabbed. Someone grabbed a cigarette and a snack and was satisfied. When someone robbed him, he first asked the clerk daoqian, and the clerk saw that he was so kind that he didn't feel the need to call the police at all, so he had to go to the police station and turn himself in. In the past, no one would have shed blood in these cases.

In that case, the prisoner lured a 10-year-old boy to a deserted place with a toy and then slit the child's throat with a knife. An innocent child just died.

It was just an ordinary child in an ordinary family, and the parents needed to work hard to support the child, and he needed more time to grow up. A child like this cannot be held accountable for any of the suffering that the prisoner has ever experienced, nor for any injustice in this society.

When the prisoner was arrested, he said, "Anyway, killing one or two people now will not be sentenced to death, and I will just eat in prison for the rest of my life." This justification for killing, before the abolitionist movement flourished in the country (in high society), was not only unheard of, but simply unimaginable.

Later, when the verdict of the first instance came out, the judge found that he was the weaker party, that his lack of work was a social hazard, and that he had a reason to kill the child. So he didn't even have the death penalty, and the judge sentenced him to life imprisonment. is more proud than the content of folk limericks.

The people of the country believe that this society, which protects the perpetrators on the one hand, should be responsible for this human life. And the one who is responsible for this kind of society is the movement to abolish the death penalty that has been created in this kind of society. Since the entire sentencing benchmark has been distorted in order not to impose the death penalty, all offenders have been bountied.

In one case, four men collectively abused a boy as young as two years and five months. The bridge of the child's nose was broken with a hammer, his fingers were shattered, his nails were falling out, and he was covered in cigarette scars. The corpse was a little flesh-colored except for the chest, all black, purple, and red, and even the soles of the feet were pierced and burned. The suspect grabbed the child and hit the wall to stop crying, burned the wound with a red-hot iron nail called treatment, and beat and fed drugs that even adults could not bear, causing the child's death.

The Supreme Court judge said that the child died because the prisoner fed drugs, and the previous fatal abuse did not cause death, so it does not count. Because the purpose is to keep the child quiet, death from shock caused by drug administration is not considered intentional homicide. Six hours after the child's death, the prisoner abandoned the deceased in the emergency room of the hospital, indicating that he intended to save the child and had a clear conscience. This is just an adult who is afraid of the child's crying has made a mistake for a while, and he is deeply remorseful, even if the leading culprit is sentenced to 30 years in prison, it is already very heavy, and there is no need to sentence life imprisonment. According to the normal state in his country, he will be released on parole after actually sitting for 15 years.

The killing of young children is like this, and the indulgence of sexual harassment and sexual assault is endless. Touching the chest for ten seconds can be said that the victim did not have time to feel uncomfortable, so he did not commit a crime. It can be said that the prisoner has different views on international etiquette and has no intention of committing a crime, so it is not a crime. During the rape, the victim did not say "no" loudly enough, so it was considered a happy relationship...... No wonder there are always people who simply drag prisoners to beat them themselves.

The victim was injured and lost his sense of smell and could not continue to work as a chef in the restaurant he opened, but he could still serve food and collect the table, so it was not considered a loss of work ability, and the perpetrator did not have to pay compensation.

A high-ranking official in the national construction department received 20,000 euros from the manufacturer (a strong currency, 20,000 is a lot of money), and because there is no evidence that he took actual action to benefit the manufacturer, it is not considered a bribe.

The abolitionist movement has grown to this point, and it is not only murderers who have benefited.

In a case of murder, imprisonment for three and a half years, and then blatant murder, but this time the death penalty was not allowed at all, the Supreme Court explained that the ratio of words spoken for the perpetrator and words spoken for the victim in the press release was 226 to 1. And the content of the 227th is the following sentence: The rights and interests of the victim are protected by the prosecutor.

Before the anger of the people broke through the gates of the Prime Minister's Office, the country's Ministry of Justice had two old problems that had not been dealt with for 10,000 years.

First, the defendant has a government-subsidized foundation and free services for human rights lawyers (if there is none, the government will provide it for free), while the victim often appeals because the defendant constantly suspects that the sentence is too heavy, and Zuihou has no money to pay for judicial services and has to "choose to forgive". This imbalance in resources has not been improved by the Ministry of Justice. It was not until the government, in order to appease the public, to allow the Minister of Justice who openly supported the abolition of the death penalty on religious grounds, and claimed that the victim had already taken care of him, stepped down, and the minister who came to power later and did not abolish the death penalty did not give the victim financial support for judicial expenses, and subsidized it all the way according to the case.

Second, before the change of minister, it was customary to exclude the victim's family in the trial process of the homicide case. The judge even thought that listening to the victims' families was just an opportunity for them to vent their emotions in the court and disrupt the order of the court. In many cases, the families of the victims can only speak through the procurator and automatically attend the courtroom, and they can only watch the perpetrator lie and hurt the victim's reputation, without having the opportunity to refute it. There were even people who never confiscated the notice of hearing, and the judge didn't even look at them before the verdict came down. It was also after the change of minister that the judge was required to state the reasons in the judgment if he did not intend to hear the family.

It can only be understood that the reason why the rights and interests of the victims in their own country have shown a huge gap over the years compared with the rights and interests of the defendants, which have continued to improve (whether fast or slow), is that the abolitionist groups control the relevant units, and they determine the relationship of "priority".

According to the abolitionist groups in their own countries, the state will only think about how to care for the victims after the abolition of the death penalty (in their words, any progress will only happen after the abolition). The reality is that as soon as the abolitionist group is removed from the government (although only one of them), the rights of the victims are immediately improved.

The principle that the abolitionist group will not say and do directly is that in order to protect the perpetrators, all victims must always sacrifice for this purpose. In order to prevent them from "persecuting" the perpetrator, the victim cannot have any rights other than to be "autonomous" to forgive.

In the aftermath of the throat-slitting case, the people were so angry that the government had to respond. If you don't respond, no one will want to be elected prime minister. If we dare to abolish the death penalty, I am afraid that the prime minister's dismissal case, which has never been successful since the founding of the People's Republic of China, will succeed this time. Under overwhelming civil pressure, the government began to execute in waves the law those who had previously been sentenced to death.

Between the upper-class people who support the abolition of the death penalty, those who want to join the upper class and follow the values of the upper class, and the ordinary people who oppose the abolition of the death penalty and the elites who understand the suffering of the common people, on the one hand, there is the independent protection of the judiciary and international Olympic aid, and on the other hand, the foundation of the united country, the influence of the two sides on the policy has finally narrowed, and the real confrontation has begun.

Kouliu was also shocked, and countless comrades in his country who had abolished death were greatly shaken by the blood of innocent children, and asked him about the throat-slitting case: "Do we still want to abolish death?"

He looked at the stacks of letters he had received from comrades from all over Shijie, at the long list of medals he had received from the "Holy Forgiveness Organization" and so on, at the shelves with a large number of records of activities he had participated in, and at the books marked with his name or with his recommendation preface prominently placed in the bookstore. He thought that when another country abolished the death penalty in Shijie, countless people he had never met congratulated each other like a family, he thought of the title of a cadre of a well-known Shijie organization that he printed on his business card, and he thought that even if he didn't know the upper class of foreign countries, as long as he told the other party that he supported the abolition of the death penalty, they would suddenly be like brothers, and they would be easy to say anything next. He thought of the warm and lovely abolition of the death penalty by foreign authors, and even the children's picture books that had been abolished in prison. It was as if he was back in front of the Prime Minister's House, surrounded by the white candles they lit for the suffering of the condemned prisoners, such a beautiful picture, he knew that there must be a media interview, and it would definitely be published in the newspapers.

Then he thought of the contempt of the people for him, of the fact that he was pointed at and scolded as he walked down the street.

No, he can't live in the wrong capacity.

So he went out and addressed the media: "Therefore, I can only work harder to abolish the death penalty......

"When those people told him that 'life imprisonment without parole' was also a violation of human rights and had to be abolished, he didn't even struggle and opposed life imprisonment. I told him that we supported the abolition of the death penalty in order to prevent people from being killed by justice, and that life imprisonment had to be included in the law as an alternative to the death penalty, but he didn't care anymore.

"When those people said that the killing order was just a tool for the government to eradicate dissidents and should be abolished, he jumped out in support of it until Nopige appeared.

"He was very scared, he said that Norpige was different from the murderers he had seen in prison, he said that Norpige was the real devil, and it was impossible for Norpig to give up killing!

"So he wanted to find a strong bodyguard who would absolutely obey orders, and he went to the black market to find an agent, and summoned a demon! I persuaded him, I told him, that demons have evil thoughts, and that they will constantly persuade their masters to sin!

"But he didn't listen to me, I told him too many times, and he called me a traitor. The demon named Ikama played with him in the palm of his hand, and he obeyed the demon's word!

"Because he is the guardian of free speech, the Staff of Light has put him in charge of the magic word system, thinking that he will not abuse this power. But he is no longer the same person he used to be! He will never take a step back in his life, he cannot lose the chairman's throne! The demon told him that as long as all the books were burned and the accountant was killed, the Staff of Light would not know about the loss of the Altaro Demon Faith. Such a stupid and evil plan! That demon didn't care what his career was, he just wanted to see people kill people! He believed that he could change Shijie, but it was Shijie who changed him. He-he's left my skin, give, give—"

Sister Dai let out a scream, "Stop him!" and she fell silent, the words cut off from the other end.

http://www.biquge.info

http://www.biquge.info

The starting point Chinese the http://www.biquge.info of the net

www.biquge.info welcome the majority of book friends to come and read, the latest, fastest, and hottest serialized works are all original at the starting point! Mobile phone users please go to the m.biquge.info to read.