The purpose of this article is to solve some problems that are not necessary for additional extensions. Just, why bother?

1. Is Sarafayido Taiwan?

A: No, it is not. First of all, Taiwan does not have a scepter of light and a shield of holiness. Then, Taiwan's land and population were not so large. The ecology of a large country is completely different from that of a small country, and Sarafayi is set to be a big country. For example, it is impossible to find an incident in Taiwan where 22 people were killed (it is too small, the prisoner was caught before killing so many people), and it would take a large country of the American level to deal with it.

Again, the range of materials I draw from is not so small. This is the age of the Internet, and with the common language, I can't just take the material from my own area, but just pick up some parts from other places that people in the area don't pay attention to (so I don't know that it happened in my own home).

Even if you want to say that the country closest to Taiwan in the story is not Sarafayido. But that country is only named at the moment.

I advise readers to abandon the idea that so-and-so is an echo of real-world so-and-so (or just to read the book as an extra amusement, and not to take it seriously). Everything I bring back is mixed together, boiled and brewed before being used. There are more than five continents on the Earth.

2. You haven't thought about many of your arguments! This will poison the reader's mind!

A: The people who say this are abolitionist supporters, and the reason why they say this is simple: what I write has nothing to do with what I have in my head: those who guide the abolition movement want them to believe that all those who oppose abolition have not thought about it (just as all non-Christians don't know how good Jehovah is).

Amnesty International, the international leader of the abolitionist movement, offers this point of view in its "Death Penalty Q&A". The same Q&A also allows abolitionist proponents to undermine democracy to achieve the goal of abolition (saying that the death penalty can be abolished by a small number of people without seeking social consensus). And tell those who read this question and answer that they should ignore the objections and abolish the death penalty.

It also mentions that even if a million people are killed (the Rwanda massacre), the death penalty cannot be imposed, and that is right.

If a reader, like me, had read articles on the guiding principles of the abolitionist movement (like Christian apologetics), he would have been to laugh at the criticisms of these directives.

3. The protagonist is the author's projection!

A: I can say with certainty that it is not.

There is indeed a character in this work that the author writes in his own image (left-handed writers are not counted first), not Xike, not Shuilonu, not Xiaojiao. It belongs to the supporting role.

4. Your criticism of religion is an infringement of religious freedom!

A: When the government forbade her to continue accusing children of witchcraft, which led to the killing and abandonment of children, Helen Ukpabio also said that the government violated her freedom of religion.

Freedom of religion is only freedom of religion, not a shield from criticism.

That should be it for now.