Well, I finally returned to a more stable rhythm and could last every two days, so I touched the fish again and wrote a small theater for everyone to enjoy. Pen × fun × Pavilion www. ｂｉｑｕｇｅ。 ｉｎｆｏ

As you may have noticed, this book seems to have an appealing ...... Let's use the word "interesting" (in English) -- the ability of the reader. While thanks to the two moderators of the book (and always the starting point of the convulsions, although often by mistake), there are basically reviews that don't taste right, and they all evaporate in time.

But unfortunately, some of the remarks came into my field of vision to a greater or lesser extent. Because of occupational diseases, I always like to analyze and classify, and after today's work is completed, on a whim, I will explain it to you:

The animal world – ahhh

Human society, of which, the ecology of the comment area.

Classification of big critics and subspecies (with personal complaints).

Okay, applause.

So first of all, we want to introduce to you, is the most common type of big critic -

I'll name it: Tailor-made.

Classic remarks:

"The plot here is written too long, the background introduction should not be placed at the beginning or at the end, the name of the protagonist is too long for others to remember, there are too few heroines, it is better to have more, the plot is not compact enough, the description of magic is too little, it is better to start revising it like this, otherwise the reader will not like it, this book will fail to write like this, and it is very uncomfortable to write like this. ”

Well, at first glance, it doesn't make sense, it seems to be pointing out the author's shortcomings for the good of the author, right?

Okay, so let's switch concepts.

"There are so many words in this book that it's tiring to read, and the author makes the reader very uncomfortable writing like this. Authors should all draw comics so that they look comfortable, and readers won't like it if they don't. ”

Hey, isn't it starting to taste right?

So let's move on to the concept a little bit more.

"Although this book has pictures, the lines still have to be expressed in words, which looks uncomfortable, and it is best for the author to make it out and have dubbing. Otherwise, the book will not be successful, otherwise the readers of the book will not like it, and it will fail. ”

(shrugs) Well, don't you think I'm distorting the subject.

But, in all fairness, do these really make a difference?

Every reader is a different person, and even if they have experienced a similar education, their own knowledge and understanding skills are different, and their views on the same things are not the same.

He likes harems and multi-heroines. You are very disgusted with the harem and disgusted with many heroines.

He likes that the protagonist is a magician, and you like that the protagonist is a swordsman.

He likes the farming essay with delicate scenery descriptions, and you like the refreshing upgrade essay with one stroke.

Between the two, is there a right or wrong, and is it doomed to fail because a certain point is not to his or your taste?

No.

There are so many categories in online novels because everyone is difficult to reconcile. If you don't like this book, you can read other books.

"If it's not to my taste, it's wrong. Yours here and here, change here, change here, change where yours, and change there. ”

This uncle, do you want me to help you make this book, and then carefully tann the cowhide cover, put the brass book corner, and then package it and send it to you in person?

Don't be tempted to represent so many lovely dear readers with colorful personalities?

The description of the scenery that you think is very verbose, people think it is very delicate, very picturesque, and very comfortable.

You want me to change it, okay.

You want me to change it to your liking, okay.

You have to give money, don't you?

Change it to your liking, then you have to make up for the loss of those readers who don't like it, don't you?

If you want to tailor it, then you give money.

"If I don't change it, I'll give up the book"

Then you give up, and I wish you found the book you like.

The world doesn't revolve around you, my dear. You don't like the book, and there are others who do. I don't get recognition from you for my efforts, but also for others.

(That's why I call this genre the tailor-made big critic who asks questions that are clearly to their own liking, and then forcibly rises to the level of the reader's preference, or even to the level of writing itself, attacking me for not being qualified to write a book.) Oh, of course, there are a lot of people who do this kind of analysis who are also authors themselves, and for sure, I am not qualified to write a book, because I have so many mistakes that they have listed, for example, I use so many commas in this paragraph, and even use them, and I use them, so of course, I have made such fatal mistakes, and I am far inferior to them in terms of writing, who are completely infallible and can easily write books that can become world-famous, super authors.

Provided that they really wrote the book (shrugging))

Well, the first one is a bit long because it's too common, so let's introduce the second one.

A big real-world critic.

In this case, I would like to quote two book reviews that have indeed existed in my book review area, and you will experience it for yourself.

"How can the first murder in the real world be such a reaction, the author scribbled it. ”

(I'm sorry, but I haven't killed anyone, so I can only guess and write.) Could you please share your life experience, and tell me about your nearest police station and the local police number-)

"The author's description of this dragon is wrong, referring to the skeleton of birds, and the dragon in the real world is not like this at all"

（....... ）

（...... ）

(I didn't expect my book to have readers from another world, it's an honor)

"In the history of Europe—"

(But what I'm writing is fantasy)

"In the real world—"

(But I'm writing an alternate novel)

Well~~

emmmm

Please experience for yourself.

So let's introduce the third type, which is almost as common as the first, and often overlaps between the two.

This one, I call it.

Button-type big critics.

This is also one of the most common types in today's online society, and I believe you can see many of them in various places.

Normally, we have an opinion because we see something, and then we start reasoning, arguing, and finally confirming whether our opinion is correct or not - this is the thinking of a logical person.

The unique feature of the big critics is that they do not prove their opinions only after reasoning.

Rather, an opinion is first generated, and then reasoning around that idea is only to prove its correctness.

So here's a hat that many readers of this book know about it, and its dialectical process, so please experience it for yourself.

"This book is very light. (Presenting an argument)

"Where is the day lighter?" (the opponent asks the reason for the argument and why he thinks the day is light)

"The words 'boy' and 'girl' used in the novel" (note that this is his initial point of view, which means that he thinks my book is light because of this)

"Isn't this Chinese, you can actually see that the day is light, what do you do with those literary texts that have the vocabulary of teenagers and girls?" (strong dry goods retort)

"It's not that Riqing got so much nonsense, only Riqing will have so many nonsense lines" (??? roy question mark, didn't you think it was Riqing at first because of the words "teenagers and girls")

"There are a lot of historical novels and a lot of lines, and Shakespeare's works also have a lot of lines, and operas are still expressed in sung lines" (second dry rebuttal)

"You look at this rhetorical device, where is it used in Chinese, it is obvious whether it is a Japanese light translation, or a wrong Japanese light translation. ”（...... ）

"How do you translate this paragraph into English?"

"Anyway, it's wrong, it's Nikkyo. (Broken jar broken)

Well~~

It's a little confusing for you, and it's easy to be picked up by the reader with the rhythm.

Again, in the form of a conceptual transformation.

Generally speaking, how do we judge whether a horse is a horse or not?

If you're a professional, you'll probably start with a variety of muscles, physique, skull shape, ears, mane, and so on. But we ordinary people have to judge, of course, it depends on the appearance, right.

It looks like it's a horse, and we think it is, and then it turns out that it's actually a mule, and we say, "Ah, that's it," and we change our perspective and learn about it to make sure we don't make the same mistake next time, right?

Then the dialogue above, borrowing an idiom story, and then modifying it slightly, becomes like this.

"It's a horse. (pointing to a toad)

"Well, why do you think it's a horse? ”

"Because it has bright eyes. ”

"Because it has strong legs. ”

"Because it has this, because it has that. ”

Behaviors like this, which constantly divert the subject in an attempt to prove one's argument, are characteristic of the button-down type. They are not trying to prove their correctness through dialectics because they have seen something, but they have already come up with opinions and prove their correctness through dialectic.

You ask him why he thinks so, he brings up one point, and then you refute it, and he brings up another point.

It's not that he thinks it's the case because he sees it. Rather, having come to such a conclusion, he deliberately looks for these points to prove himself.

This behavior is called "confirmation bias" in psychology.

It manifests itself in "ignoring all evidence against one's own words, and seeing only those that can corroborate one's own words." ”

Of the 100 roses, one is blue and the other 99 are red. They can then conclude that "roses are blue".

And then the above three types, after jumping out to do things on their own, but being banned.

I will also go to other places to promote it.

The author is not flattering, the author has a bad character, and the author has a bad temper.

Well, what can I say.

I hope that you will learn to think, learn to discern what is really a conclusion reached through logical thinking, and not be fooled by these moral kidnappings mixed with personal subjective opinions, and have your own opinions.

Whether the book is good or not, read it yourself. Others say that it is not necessarily suitable for you, and it is just their own experience that others say that it is not good.

Rory wrote a lot of words, and in the end he didn't know what he was writing.

I hope you will have a lot of fun watching this small theater.

I guess I'm just not in a good mood and just want to write something, and I'm not so busy.

Good night.