At the end of April, I was in a state of mental distress, and I thank you all for your unwavering support.

The following readers have been rewarded: Autumn Wind 々 Listen to the Rain, Yushan Branch, Starting Point Reading iOS, Book Friend 20191009104616637, Huiguang, Starting Point Reading iOS, liliky, Sagittariusq, Book Friend 160407204707866, Zangfeng Dragonfly, Nether Lonely Fish, Book Friend 20200403130411475, Ye Yuye, Book Friend 20171125223612688, Lazy ToT, Bian Feng Luoyu, Zihang T, Li Xiao Ba, Tai Huang, It's a little difficult to call it, Mu Mu 51QAQ, let go of the black frame, Wen Tengteng, Book Friend 160726204202424, Tian Xin, Mayou Gongzi Yan Ruyu, It's Aki Fei, Xiao Pei who was forced to jump off the building by life, God's gift against the sky, Li Xiaoba, Wan Jun_, starting point reading iOS, bluedrea7, Mirror Sage.

------------------------------------------------------------

I calculated that the total amount of the tip was 212 yuan. In view of the interruption at the end of last month, it is intended to compensate for the two changes. In addition to the May Day leave, this month is more planned (0/4)

Also, babble a little off-topic.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Someone asked me about the so-called Break Festival.

It's a coincidence, I went back to the old lady's party today and gave the old lady a birthday. I didn't plan to update it, and I ran into this again. So the day before yesterday, I said that if I came back late that day, I would suspend it for a day. Well, I bought the leave slip in the background of the starting point.

Who knows, today the family invariably chose to gather at noon. So, I decided to buy lemon tea to make sure that my peers didn't need to drink. Dodge a glass of wine and fly home in the afternoon to code words.

Since it's all such a coincidence, today's update will be as usual. After all, some time ago, there were often interruptions, and readers may have been very irritable, and they need to work hard to save their character these days.

However, for the Breaking Festival, I would like to pay due respect to my colleagues who dare to participate in this event.

It is not the goal, but a means to negotiate with China Literature and the subsequent legislation to arouse public opinion. It can also be regarded as a morale boost for his own family, attracting the attention of the entire industry and even the society.

I learned that many colleagues from other websites supported China Literature because of the turmoil, and some authors even participated in the "Break Change" section, either by breaking the change or by leaving a message under the article.

Today's interruption activities of the authors of China Literature did not make other writers of the station feel cold, and made the writers of the station feel that they were provoked to be used as gunmen.

It can also be regarded as uniting everyone to prepare for the revision of the Copyright Law in the future.

That's right, breaking off is not the goal, legislation is the foundation! Now that the "Copyright Law" is open to the public for public consultation, this is the top priority of the authors!

Regardless of the outcome, at least the Copyright Law will allow everyone to have a law to follow and protect themselves with the help of legal weapons.

Of course, I've also heard that some "readers" and "authors" run under other normal update authors to carry out moral kidnapping.

IMHO, such people are either stupid or bad.

5.5 Interrupt the update activity, and the author will be vaccinated in advance: it is not allowed to make trouble under the author who is normally updated, and do not split the author group. Interruptions are only voluntary, and authors who are updating normally cannot be harassed.

The purpose of the authors has been clear from the beginning, to promote the revision of the Copyright Law, to actively respond to the call of the state, to contribute to the improvement of the law, and to fulfill the rights and obligations of citizens.

Any author, any creator, any creator who is willing to promote the improvement of the Copyright Law is our companion, not our enemy.

Therefore, I am very skeptical, the group of people who go to carry out moral kidnapping, are they people or ghosts under the skin?

Have you gone to the moral kidnapping of other authors, did the National People's Congress go today? Did the Intellectual Property Office go? Did you brush up on Weibo's major official blogs? Do you encourage authors to go together, help uninformed authors popularize the necessity of the "Copyright Law", and pull relatives and friends to respond positively?

If you have the kung fu of infighting, it is better to popularize science with the people around you, and try your best to invite creators from all walks of life to improve the "Copyright Law" together.

The Copyright Law not only covers literary works, but also all written works and audiovisual works. Even if it is a joke written by himself, a photo taken by himself, or a video of only a few tens of seconds, the rights belong to the creator.

Screenwriters, photographers, cartoonists, designers, engineers, video masters, etc., are all within the scope of protection of the Copyright Law. The promotion of the Copyright Law is related to the vital interests of each and every one of us, is an important step in the improvement of China's law, and is an important part of the construction of civilization.

Having a law to follow and governing the country according to law is also the greatest expectation of us ordinary people.

......

Finally, talk about the gossip you heard on the Internet.

There seems to be a problem in the author's background today?The update time is wrong.,Caused yesterday's update to appear today?And a group of pit works come back to life.,And the same content is updated in unison?

Well, these works, which should have been updated yesterday, appear today. In terms of attendance, is it counted according to one day, or is it counted according to two days? If it happens that some authors have a change because of something today, and they happen to encounter this kind of "background error" situation. So can you kindly help them make up for their attendance, and calculate it according to the normal update of the two days? After all, this background mistake has nothing to do with the author.

In addition, when readers see that many books are updated at the same time, and so many cookie-cutter articles appear, will readers mistakenly think that they are plagiarizing each other, destroying the "Reading Style Review" and damaging the reputation of the original authors?

Of course, if it's just rumors on the Internet. There is no problem in the background, so let me "talk to myself".

It's just that for the "crash" in the background, here only for individuals, I hope this kind of thing doesn't happen again.

The backstage is a private space for authors to update, and sometimes some unpublished manuscripts and outlines will be placed. I really don't want anyone else to get involved for "some shady reason" other than a trusted editor.

Please don't break each other's bottom line!

Latest URL:.