I simply used LoL to explain to the end, there are many people who play this game, and it is easy to understand.

Why is it the hardest time when the two sides play against each other, and why does the winning side lose the most at this time?

Think about LoL team battles, there are 5 people gathered under the same equipment, do you have to be especially careful when fighting? Is it easy to swap? often 2 die on one side, and 3 on the other side!

But if one side of the C position is not properly moved, and the other side does not pay any price, is it often 1 for 5 and O for 5 in the end?

What happened to the formation that completely collapsed? One waited for the resurrection, one fought BuFF, one collected troops in the lower lane, and two were chased and killed by 5 people in the middle lane. I still have the courage to kill, I only know how to run, and I don't even dare to let go of my skills!(This is too common in ancient wars, as long as the formation collapses completely, it is faster than anyone else.) Everyone knows that saying: I don't need to outrun the enemy, I just need to outrun you! LoL everyone is not afraid of death, nothing more than waiting for resurrection, ancient wars run slowly but die! Once defeated, who still has the heart to resist, nonsense. No matter how elite the troops are, don't think that the special forces are so bad, they can bear an extra 5%~1o% casualty ratio, and then run when it's time to escape!) In ancient times, when escaping, they would trample on each other because of crowding, and there was a unit collision volume in LoL, and when your hero ran away, he was stuck by a small soldier, do you want to strangle the small soldier? Put it on the battlefield, you push me, and then squeeze and squeeze and fall to the ground and be trampled to death! Every time the war is lost, there are many people who die like this.

In the end, the victor can clean up the battlefield, the injured can recover, and the wounded soldiers of the losing side are basically made up!

And in ancient wars, it was precisely every time that the dead were not injured. Therefore, the books are called casualties, injuries and deaths.

Then even if the number of people who died in the battle was about the same, the gap was too big when the battlefield was cleaned.

You can understand that the winner can go back to the city to add blood, but the loser cannot! Because even empty blood in the game does not affect mobility, and everyone knows it in reality.

Sandan book friends specifically asked, how can special forces withstand 30% of battle losses, why can they achieve 1 to 2O.

The first must be the command, the same army and different people command are completely two concepts, the Yan army commanded by Le Yi was able to almost destroy the Qi country, but it was replaced by the cavalry command, and the Qi country with only two cities left (there are more than 7o cities in the Qi country) actually restored the country, and the Yan army was directly beaten back all the way...... Except for the commander, the Yan army has not changed anything! And the strength of the Qi State is less than one-tenth left, 1oo% of the strength can't beat Le Yi, and 1o% of the strength can beat the cavalry. That's why there is a saying that one general is incompetent and exhausts the three armies. Modern people don't command cold ratio wars, this is the absolute problem, and the command ability of the protagonist in this book can only be hehe.

The second is the transmission of orders, there is no walkie-talkie, and modern special forces are not suitable! Orders can only be conveyed orally, and the efficiency is several times worse than that of the Sui army! (Of course, this problem can be solved in a few months of adaptation)

The third is the battle formation. It's still a set of LoL, the same heroes, the same equipment. The difference between different people is just too big to be true. So a king with the same equipment can casually beat 5 elementary school students (the same equipment corresponds to special forces, and there is also discipline and training, but unfortunately the experience of cold weapon warfare is that kings compare with primary school students) So with the same equipment and heroes, you can have empty blood and counter-kill full blood, really don't be too surprised.

There are many other factors that I will not mention. The last 2o times is the imaginary finger, not that I have calculated that it is 2o times, one is not more and one is not less, but the gap can be up to 2o times. Anyway, those who know ancient habits know what a virtual finger is.

Then, you said that the special forces can withstand at least 30% casualties, and I think this is definitely the highest estimate.

This is different from playing computer games, there are not so many dead soldiers! The average bearing capacity of the ancient army was 10%, 20% was elite troops, and 30% was the level of the general's personal guards. Do you estimate that thirty percent is still not satisfied?

In fact, you don't agree with me on this issue, the key is that our judgment of organizational ability varies greatly.

You think that the special forces are well-organized and disciplined. It has an advantage over the Sui army.

But in fact, in this regard, the special forces are at a complete disadvantage. The first point is that you ignore that the Sui army has been trained for a long time and its discipline is not weaker than that of the special forces. (I'll give you an example, in ancient wars, when the generals didn't speak, and the soldiers dared to rush up to kill the enemy, even if they were meritorious, they would be found guilty in Wu Qi's army, and they would be beheaded immediately!) Zhou Yu's military discipline requirements included 7 prohibitions and 54 beheadings! It was much stricter than that of the special forces!, I guess the reason why you think that the poor discipline of the ancient army was still influenced by the Ming and Qing dynasties, especially the influence of TV dramas.) Indeed, there is no discipline in the Qing army, because there is no difference between the discipline that cannot be enforced and the discipline that cannot be enforced is really no different from not!)

The second point is organization. Even if a person is good at mathematics, you can't expect him to be good in physics, chemistry, and English. In the same way, special forces have strong organizational ability in thermal weapon combat, but when they release cold weapon warfare, they become weak in organizational ability.

And it's not a little weaker than the Sui army, not to mention the forbidden army. (In fact, it is called Xiaoguo Army, and the forbidden army is the name of the Northern Song Dynasty)

If you don't understand, imagine a soccer coach coaching a basketball team, even if it's the world's No. 1 soccer coach in terms of organizational ability!

The third point is malleability. You can't accept that the special forces are so much weaker than the Sui army, it hurts your emotions, right? But it's not fixed. In other words, the reason why the special forces could not fight was not because they were too bad, but because they were not familiar with the big war of cold weapons! If the special forces were to be allowed to fight in small units on battlefields such as jungles, deserts, and urban buildings, even if they were compared to cold weapons, the special forces would not be inferior, let alone compare hot weapons and marksmanship together. From the point of view of malleability, as long as the special forces spend a few years learning the tactics of cold weapon warfare, then they will be able to unleash the advantages and characteristics of modern times, isn't it? At that time, as long as the commander-in-chief was strong, it was normal for the battle to lose 1 to 1.

In addition, let me explain to you the combat effectiveness of the army in the era of cold weapons in ancient China. The infantry was the strongest in the Warring States period, and then the Qin army (the Qin army's heavy crossbows were too powerful). The Han and Tang dynasties were second (influenced by Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty's exclusive respect for Confucianism, and the combat effectiveness declined slightly), and the Northern Song Dynasty began to weaken (Zhao Kuangyin's good deeds, emphasizing literature and light martial arts, strong cadres and weak branches, separating generals, anyway, how to cut combat effectiveness. After the middle of the Ming Dynasty, it was a scum that did not even have 5 in combat effectiveness (military science declined, the status of second-grade military generals was not as high as that of seven-rank civil officials, and the morale of the soldiers in the guard was negative), and in the middle of the Qing Dynasty, it was not even as good as the scum (mosquito prison, full of sweat, foolish people, bureaucracy, etc.). If you don't understand, you can think about it anyway). And then this state went all the way to the Republic of China. (Although the weapons and equipment are always updated, the organizational ability, discipline, and morale are all negative.) So even if many people boast about the Hunan army, the combat effectiveness is only 5, and it is not as good as being able to beat the scum just now. Take a look at Zeng Guofan's tactics: march 3o miles a day, form a hard village, and fight in a daze. (Wear a single coat, at most a layer of cotton armor, basically no weight) to send troops to silver. The troops were maintained by clan ties and had no discipline to speak of. Reward and punishment look at the relationship, and the second depends on the mood of the Lord. Recruited recruits can only be used for a few years, and then they quickly decay and are unable to fight again. No matter how you look at it, it's all 5 scum.

Compared with Wei Wu's cousin, when the battle situation is urgent, it takes ten days for a person to support 3oo miles away without much load, and then set up camp first and rest for a day before he can fight. One with a weight of 7o pounds, rushed to the battlefield within two days and immediately put into battle. One does not understand the art of war, for fear of being attacked. A proficient in the art of war, all kinds of scouts, sentinels are complete, and the rapid march is not afraid of ambushes, it is really incomparable. (Any Wei Wushu put the late Qing Dynasty is a martial champion) in the late Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China, Yuan Shikai's six towns in Beiyang and the strong point of the Northern Expeditionary Army.

The classification of my discussion here is based on organizational ability, discipline, command level, morale, and military willpower. Equipment is a secondary factor. (Because in the same era, it is difficult to crush others with equipment, especially in China, which is not too much)

Then there is that the combat effectiveness of the army, especially the combat effectiveness of the cold weapon era, becomes unimportant in quantity after the number of people reaches tens of thousands, but the important quality. These are the factors I mentioned above. Because you have too many people, not to mention logistical problems, it is a problem to organize, and if one is not done well, it is not a help, but a scourge! At the same time, when you are in a match, because of the space, there are only a few thousand people who can fight. Then if a bad front army is crushed, and the defeated army counterattacks the other arrays of friendly forces, it will be a complete rout! Then it will be a game of sheep hunting. That's why so many outrage on the strong. A 50,000-strong soldier can defeat an ordinary army 1o times larger, but it is difficult for 5,000 elite soldiers to defeat an ordinary army 1o times larger. (With the ancient supply capacity, a medium-sized city could supply tens of thousands of people at most.) So even if you have hundreds of thousands of troops, it is difficult to gather together, and you must divide into several routes. That's why there are various breaks. What I have to say here is on organizational ability, on supply ability. During the Warring States period, it was several times stronger than the Two Song Dynasty and ten times stronger than the Ming and Qing Dynasties. During the Warring States Period, every country raised hundreds of thousands of troops!) And the art of war and organization in the Qin and Han dynasties were really powerful, and how to reorganize the defeated army was really orderly. In battles of hundreds of thousands, few defeated troops rushed straight to their own positions. When Han Xin dared to claim to be a soldier, the more the merrier (the more the merrier). And no matter the miscellaneous soldiers or the elite soldiers. The most terrifying thing is that the arrangement of the formation is extremely reasonable, there are miscellaneous soldiers and elite soldiers, and the total number of hundreds of thousands is not a little chaotic. Even Xiang Yu couldn't catch the mistakes and omissions of Han Xin's formation. Everyone probably heard of the siege of Xiaxia, and then Xiang Yu was finished. Do you know how he was surrounded? That is, he was defeated by Han Shin. Xiang Yu broke through multiple arrays of Han Xin's army in a row, but Han Xin was able to arrange the miscellaneous soldiers, and after breaking for a while, Xiang Yu was consumed to death. Look at Genghis Khan's several battles to destroy the Jin Kingdom. The Yuan army has only tens of thousands of people, the Jin ** team is hundreds of thousands, and the Jin army warriors are not few. But it just can't be organized, and it can't be used to gain numerical advantage. Let's talk about the Yellow Turban Army uprising in the late Eastern Han Dynasty. A few thousand Eastern Han Dynasty and northern and southern armies plus tens of thousands of local county soldiers were able to defeat 200,000 or 300,000 Yellow Turban troops, or was this the case in all battlefields, because the Yellow Turbans had poor organizational ability!

War really isn't a numbers game. Command and dispatch are too important. In order to command and dispatch, there must be discipline and training. So it's still Han Xinmeng, it's just that he can use the recruits who have been in the army for a month as elites, and the most BT is that just these tens of thousands of recruits took the initiative to attack and broke the Zhao army by 2o thousand. You say how fierce he is! And in the Ming and Qing dynasties, there was no longer a deep art of war, which is really sad.

According to what I said above, everyone can also understand why the Qing army just can't beat the foreigners, and the Republic of China is the reason why people are bullied. Military affairs really don't just have good weapons.

Look at how this dynasty fought out, the weapons are rotten to the home, but by gradually restoring to the original ancient combat effectiveness level (referring to the software, su zhì aspect, not weapons) is able to push flat! Taizu obviously understands the art of war, and has the level of ancient generals, but unfortunately it is not the true legend of the soldiers, and it is still inferior to the ancient famous generals. (Therefore, in North Korea, when the weapons are much worse, it has to rely on more than 3 times the superiority of troops, and casualties several times higher than others to defeat the US imperialists.) But it is several grades stronger than Chang Kaishen and Li Hongzhang, and it is so strong that it can't be compared. ）

Then Sandan, you ask how the ancient army can't defeat the Hu people with such strong combat effectiveness, right? Have you ever heard of a saying, called a Han when five hu. It means that in the two Han Dynasty periods, in battles of more than a few thousand people, the combat effectiveness of a Han army was greater than that of five Hu people. When Huo Qubing swept through Mobei, the number of troops was tens of thousands, which was much less than the number of the Huns. Li Ling sent out 5,000 infantry troops, surrounded by 80,000 cavalry in the hinterland of the Xiongnu, and was stunned to shoot more than 10,000 Xiongnu soldiers with bows and crossbows, and then the 5o thousand bows and arrows he carried were used up, and there were no reinforcements, so he was defeated. According to the latest statements and research, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was able to defeat the Xiongnu with cavalry, and the saddle and stirrup were definitely there, and the Xiongnu should have been equipped. Therefore, there is no problem that the Xiongnu soldiers were weaker than the Jin soldiers (Wanyan Aguta) and Jianzhou Jurchen (**Hachi) in later generations.

The problem of Wuhu is actually the problem of the Jin Dynasty. Originally, the number of Han people was greatly reduced after the Three Kingdoms melee, and then you can see what kind of bird it is militarily when you look at the atmosphere of the two Jin Dynasty, and the clan gate valve is also one of the big problems. On the whole, the combat effectiveness of the army is similar to that of the Southern Song Dynasty. Coupled with the most direct event, the Eight Kings Rebellion, it can be said that it was completely the people of the Sima family who led the wolf into the house in order to compete for the throne, which gave others a chance.

Later, as I said above, one generation is not as good as the next. During the Southern Song Dynasty, the Hu people dared to say that "the Jurchens are not satisfied with 10,000, and they are invincible...... In fact, their combat effectiveness is not necessarily stronger than that of the Huns. In such a comparison, you can see how weak the combat effectiveness from the Han Dynasty to the Southern Song Dynasty is. (Zhao Kuangyin, the decisive national sinner didn't have to run) and then the back is completely miserable, and the combat effectiveness is really inferior to the Hu people. (The soldiers temporarily recruited by a certain general can barely be called an army, and the standing army of the Ming and Qing dynasties has a war of 5 scum and a big scum.) I'm too lazy to say it)

Tips: The new domain name "biquge.info" has been launched by Biquge, and the original domain name is about to be discontinued. Please tell each other, thank you!