Who else?

I don't know, I still think that you Shen Jiarui is the author of "Roger's Mystery Case".

Some people in the circle were full of slander, but they had to admit that there was nothing wrong with this thing's previous bragging.

It is worthy of being the number one Chu blowing.

Of course, not all reviews are good, "The Mystery of Roger", as Grandma's most controversial work, is not to mention polarized evaluations, and it is indeed a voice that I don't like -

"The narrative technique is too laid-back, sacrificing the excitement of the case for the shock effect of the ending, and it feels like the end of the book. ”

"It's really clever to fool the reader, or a lot of people feel happy to be fooled, but I don't like this kind of reasoning. ”

"I don't like this kind of writing either, but I also admit that this is indeed a new type of reasoning and creative method, and I can only pray that my favorite writers don't follow suit. ”

"Reasoning can't be evaluated entirely on the basis of incomprehension...... In the evil way of writing, I still like to decorate the cocoon and reasoning heartily, rather than playing this kind of word game with the writer. ”

"The ending is really shocking, but is it only I think it's lethargic to watch in the early and middle periods?"

"It's really great, but I can't accept this kind of storytelling, and there's a subtle emotion of [it's wonderful, but I'm not being tricked] is churning, and it feels a little bad. ”

“......”

There is a price to be paid for tricking readers!

Because not everyone can accept this kind of play.

Moreover, there are different types of reasoning, and narrative reasoning is precisely the "poison point" of some reasoning fans.

When Grandma launched "Roger's Mystery Case", she was also questioned by many people, thinking that this article was unfair to readers, and the emergence of new things was to face controversy.

At this time.

Those who feel poisoned are not only some readers, but also writers!

Yes, after reading "The Mystery of Roger", some mystery writers feel that they have been tricked, and after reading it, they directly scolded Chu Madness.

Most of the foul mouths are just two sentences on their lips and it's over.

But there are writers who are born with the desire to vent, such as Leng Guang, a famous reasoning writer in Qi Province.

The cold light is sprayed directly on the tribe:

"I've been recommending "The Mystery of Roger" to me since last night, I read it with anticipation, but after reading it, I was so disappointed, I just want to say, it's a foul!"

It may be too much to say that the spray is more euphemistic, but Leng Guang is indeed very dissatisfied.

Leng Guang, a reasoning writer, is known for his straightforwardness, and he has also published a "Five Principles of Reasoning".

This code is very popular in circles.

Code 1: Detectives cannot solve crimes in supernatural ways.

Article 2 of the Code: Poisons that have not yet been invented, or devices that require esoteric scientific explanations, must not be used when committing crimes.

Article 3 of the Code: Detectives shall not solve crimes based on clues that have not been shown to the reader.

Article 4 of the Code: A detective shall not become a criminal.

Article 5 of the Code: Detectives must not judge cases based on so-called intuition

The first few are not controversial, and they are basically default in the circle, because those ones will really make the work uninteresting.

But the fact that detectives must not become criminals is ignored by some people.

In the mystery world, there are some heretical works that will use detectives as criminals.

Therefore, Leng Guang proposed the "Five Principles of Reasoning", but the fifth one was removed from the circle and became the "Four Principles of Reasoning".

This once made the cold light angry many insiders:

How can you take the liberty of removing the last part of my code of reasoning?

Although "The Mystery of Roger" does not use the detective as the criminal, the "I" from the first-person perspective is the criminal, but it is similar to the detective himself being the murderer.

So this is completely unacceptable with cold light!

However, Leng Guang's criticism did not cause much repercussions, because Leng Guang is a well-known troll in the reasoning world, and everyone knows it.

You don't hate cold light too much.

Although this product loves to spray, it also has a bit of true temperament in it.

In fact, there are many mystery writers, including Earth, who hate the narrative reasoning and have publicly complained about it, such as Quinn, who is only a little less famous than Grandma (Quinn is a pen name shared by two people).

Of course, Quinn didn't dare to complain about Grandma, but he didn't like this way of writing.

But there are two sides to everything.

For example, the famous Keigo Higashino.

He wrote a work called "Malice" which is a typical narrative trick, paying tribute to grandma across the ages, which shows that Keigo Higashino approves of this creative technique.

Coincidentally.

In the same era, there were also reasoning people who recognized "Roger's Mystery Case", this person is the monumental character of the reasoning writer in Chu Province, Carter!

Carter's fame is much greater than that of cold light.

He commented on "The Mystery of Roger" on the tribe, and there were many praises between his words:

"The trick of using words, this is a brilliant idea, when I read the penultimate chapter, I guessed the murderer, but this did not offset the shock I felt after reading the ending, this is really a genius idea! Chu Mad has created a new type of reasoning! I have a little itchy hands and want to create it in this way, unfortunately I haven't read Chu Mad before, but now I really want to say to Chu Mad , welcome to join the reasoning circle, look forward to your creation of better works in the future!"

The bigwig's speech was very influential.

Some of Carter's readers, even if they don't like "The Mystery of Roger", when they see their idol say this, the balance in their hearts gradually tilts towards Chu Madness:

"If you think about it, there's nothing wrong with what Mr. Carter said, this is a new type of reasoning. ”

"I've seen a lot of people say that this style is disgusting, look at the overall situation of the Carter boss, and look at new things from multiple angles!"

"Carter can be said to have a very big picture, because this genre will trigger countless follow-up works to imitate, which is actually a good thing for the future development of reasoning. ”

"I didn't expect Mr. Carter to like this book too, hehe, I have the same taste as idols. ”

“......”

Leng Guang left a message in the comment area angrily: "I don't dare to agree. ”

Carter replied with a "^_^".

By the way, after Leng Guang published the five laws of reasoning, the fifth law was deleted by Carter.

At that time, Carter boasted about the five laws published by Leng Guang, saying that you are awesome with little light, and then turned his head and removed the fifth one, making it the four laws widely circulated in the reasoning world......

Leng Guang almost cried at that time.

He used to like Carter very much, but this incident directly turned the cold light powder black.

Today, I saw Carter praising "The Mystery of Roger", and the cold light myocardial infarction was fast.

And with the emergence of some controversy, the official Weibo of Yinlan Library also dispatched, directly adding an important note to this reasoning storm:

"Chu Mad with the masterpiece "Roger Mystery Case", opened up a precedent for narrative reasoning, the so-called narrative trickery is narrative trickery, this is the highlight moment of reasoning, there may be more innovative works in the future, but no one can cover up the brilliance of Chu Mad this work!"

Of course, the author of his own family is desperate!

Yinlan Library is also in a hurry to set the tone and make an established fact:

Chu Mad is in the field of reasoning, with narrative tricks, to open a mountain!

——————————

PS: Ask for a monthly pass.