In fact, Leng Guang's reading speed is not fast, and he has also delayed a lot of effort in buying books.

The effort he delayed was enough for the first readers of "Murder on the Orient Express" to write a lot of book reviews, and even detonate some topics.

In fact.

The real response starts with the comments given by the first readers, and a reasoning forum becomes the first platform to explode on the Internet!

The Reasoning Forum is a gathering place for Reasoning fans.

The number of hardcore reasoning enthusiasts is not low!

That's the expectation of readers who haven't been disappointed by the content of "Murder on the Orient Express" even after the Reasoning Society and Carter have been confirmed, and it is also the almost satisfied moans and moans of mystery lovers after the ultimate satisfaction.

Whew!

Countless posts have sprung up like mushrooms after a rain!

Perhaps no post can represent everyone's mood.

Everyone has different feelings, but everyone is the same in the face of this shock!

"I thought I was watching a traditional reasoning, Chu Mad was writing a narrative, and I was deceived twice in a row, this time I was thinking, no matter how traditional Chu Ma's plot is, I believe that this must be a gorgeous narrative, and as a result, I knelt down directly when I saw the end...... Chu Mad has really started to write traditional reasoning!"

This comment has a high number of likes!

Just as Lin Yuan planned.

His works can be narrative or traditional, between fiction and reality, so that readers can't guess the answer without seeing the end!

For the following posts, the likes and replies are also not low.

"After reading this, I began to believe that "Dong Dong Suspension Bridge Falling" is really Chu Mad ridiculing and alerting to the narrative, and then suddenly felt some sympathy for Mr. Leng Guang, you have nothing to do ......with him."

"This question is out of the box!"

"When I saw Poirot uncover the truth in one breath, it is no exaggeration to say that when I learned that the murderer killed the victim with a knife, my eyeballs almost exploded, my scalp was really numb, and my goosebumps were all up!"

"Carter's order didn't lie to me!

"Before reading it, I thought the reasoning score was slightly higher, and after reading it, I was thinking, is this really a low score?

"Polo Polo Polo! I love this pineapple to death!"

"Hahaha, the name Polo appeared, maybe it was just that Chu Mad wanted to eat pineapple at that time. ”

"I'm sorry, Chu Mad is a god!"

"I'm sorry, because of the narrative and prejudice against Chu madness, after reading this new work, I am happy and convinced, the ending is very healing, I have always hoped that in this filthy world, in the corner where the law does not shine or does not want to shine, there will be an invisible hand raising the sword of judgment, such as these thirteen so-called murderers, when I see Poirot's decision and the last few lines, I feel extremely warm in my heart, although I can't do anything, I am an insignificant guy, I am still willing to use my insignificant five-star evaluation, to express my respect for this behavior and this understanding。 ”

"The victim is the perpetrator, thirteen victims...... It's shocking, and with the final turn, Poirot is handsome! The war song is already ringing in my head! It's a pity that BGM always feels that he is not worthy of Poirot. ”

"2333, Chu Mad has Xianyu, let Xianyu write songs. ”

"Poirot was the first detective in the history of mystery to let a prisoner go, at least this is the first time I've seen it done...... Maybe this will be controversial, but I want to say to Chu Mad that well done!"

“......”

In the post, there are repeated mentions of Polo.

Poirot's decision made everyone discuss it repeatedly.

Someone cut out the text, and when Poirot gave him two options, he said:

Everything is either right or wrong, and you ......

He was silent for a long time before he said something like this in confusion: "I can't make a judgment. 】

He left the choice to others.

And when everyone chooses the first conclusion, the murderer is not guilty, Poirot takes off his hat, bows, announces his withdrawal from the case, and slowly turns away in the snow.

What is good and what is evil?

This is the first time Poirot can't tell the difference, but it has fascinated countless readers!

Everyone seemed to see the lonely back in the snow, and as they walked, they thought about it......

In fact, readers who have read "The Mystery of Roger" know very well how proud and principled Poirot is.

Everyone is accustomed to Poirot's wisdom and divine judgment!

It's incredible to be able to say "I can't judge".

It's like he finally walked out of the case.

Because it is incredible, readers can empathize with Poirot's torment and choice!

At this moment, Poirot has become a recognized detective in the hearts of countless people!

You must know that "the world's famous detective" is the setting given to Poirot by the author.

The author's pen can be set at will, what is the most handsome man in the world, the most beautiful woman in the world, and so on.

A third-rate writer who sets his own self-will.

Top writers, as soon as the story and setting come out, the readers collectively climax, as if there is really that person.

This is called pen power.

So it is not easy for readers to admit that "Poirot is a world-famous detective", and Chu Madness did it easily-

Two are enough.

used "Roger's Mystery Case" to lay the foundation and foreshadowing.

used "Murder on the Orient Express" to open up word-of-mouth and cognition.

Poirot's story may continue in the future, but at this moment, Poirot, a detective who spared the murderer, has ushered in a big hit in the minds of readers!

Of course.

Guessing lovers are also taken care of, as this comment says:

"I'll never guess the routine of the old thief Chu!The most hateful thing is that the old thief Chu swore that he gave an extremely complicated setting, and even listed the simple diagram of the carriage and the timetable of the characters' actions, etc., and after I racked my brains to draw a piece of paper, I suddenly threw out his newly invented impossible crime mode!!"

Yes.

There are many readers who read Murder on the Orient Express trying to find out the truth one step ahead of the detective, which is a big hobby of mystery lovers reading this type of book.

But when everyone saw the end, they were shocked at the same time, but they were all dumbfounded.

Did you foul yourself?

Chu Mad has actually completed a new mode of reasoning!

There were thirteen murderers!

Of course, it is necessary to "unexpectedly", all the passengers in the carriage collectively gang up to commit crimes, help each other cover, and provide alibi, which directly leads to the fact that all testimony may be false.

Who would have thought of this!?

Isn't there only one person in the mindset of normal people?

Occasionally, there are only two or three people who commit crimes in partnership, right?

But in this one, all the conventional ways of reasoning are wrong, and the ending is simply a full member!

At the same time, all the members!

This is the same as watching the narrative for the first time, and you can't guess the murderer anyway, Chu Mad's "Murder on the Orient Express", this is a new mode of reasoning!

It's almost impossible to guess!

So after reading it, it's hard not to be confused!

Not to mention, until the answer was revealed, everyone instinctively thought that Chu Mad was writing a narrative.

The media gimmicks are all played.

The literary battle between Chu madness and cold light, the duel between narrative and tradition.

As a result, as soon as Chu Mad's new book came out, everyone saw the head and realized, ah, this product is sincerely teasing us, he is the same as Leng Guang wrote this time, which belongs to the category of traditional reasoning!

Even, even the pattern of murder in the secret room is not much different!

"I feel that Chu Mad is really the writer who can play tricks on readers the most, but I am quite happy to be tricked. ”

"Chu Mad created a narrative, but Chu Mad never said that he would only narrate, he was just wilted, knowing that everyone has habitual thinking, he just didn't explain the type of writing this time, but because he didn't explain it, so when I found out that this is a traditional reasoning, and at the same time almost subverted the traditional reasoning mode, I was dumbfounded!"

"Worthy of an old thief. ”

"The old thief is playing with our feelings!

"The one who was played the most was obviously Leng Guang, pulling Chu Mad to fight against him, and as a result, Chu Mad defeated Leng Guang with the traditional reasoning that Leng Guang was best at. ”

"This is equivalent to Chu Mad defeating Leng Guang with Leng Guang's best martial arts, which is a bit embarrassing. ”

"I feel sorry for the cold light, although this product loves to spray, but people don't come with their mouths open, the spray is basically justified, this time it is crazy to hit Chu, it is really bad luck to hit the ghost. ”

Chu Mad also slapped the anti-narrative reader in the face this wave, before "Dong Dong Suspension Bridge Falling" came out, didn't many people complain that Chu Mad would be a deceitful, and he also voted for the second time, wanting to pull Chu Mad off the horse, but now Chu Mad will tell everyone clearly: Brother's traditional reasoning is even better than narrative trickery. ”

“......”

This time it's not about brain supplementation and over-interpretation.

Lin Yuan really had this kind of thought.

He didn't want to give everyone the impression that he was only a storyteller.

Therefore, this time it must use traditional reasoning, and it must be a work that is explosive enough.

Now, this work has really exploded!

Traditional reasoning can also bring forth the new and write a murder mode of full cooperation!

It's a trick within a ruse!

directly swollen the faces of those reasoning fans who were disdainful of Chu Mad before.

It's really like some readers commented, who would have thought that Chu Mad's traditional reasoning would be even better than the narrative!

Those who have voted for Chu Mad before, one is counted as one, and they are collectively punished in front of "Murder on the Orient Express".

And the aftermath of this explosion not only shocked readers, but also shook countless authors in the reasoning circle......

You must know that reasoning writers are the most sensitive to reasoning.

Readers are just admiring the subtlety of this story, but mystery writers clearly understand how difficult it is to create such a story!

"Chu Mad is too demonic!"

On this day, after reading "Murder on the Orient Express", someone in a group of reasoning writers sighed with emotion.

In the group, it's all +1.