The last time I saw an article, deeply aroused my agreement, under such an article, I found out that the theater model turned out to be like this, before, I haven't read this article, I don't know that the theater model is like this, it seems that in normal times, we still have to get in touch with some new theories, under these new theories, we will also understand some of the truths, and some new concepts, the original text says this, that is, when watching a movie in the theater, if there is a short person behind who can't see, he will stand up and watch the movie, and the person in the back, because he stood up, so he also stood upIn fact, the stool is for people to sit on, but at this time it is for people to stand on it, although many people stand up, if you don't stand up at this time, you may not see anything, this is such a point of view, is it the fault of the person who stood up first?

Or is it the fault of the people who maintain order in the theater? No one can say for sure, but the person who stands up at the beginning, in a short period of time, may see very clearly, and may feel that there is a good effect, although he will get tired when he stands up, but what about after that?

When a lot of people stand up like this, what is the difference between everyone standing up and not standing up?

If everyone stands up, the effect is not particularly different from the effect of everyone sitting, and there will be a different effect, and in this way, it is not even as good as the effect of not standing up before.

After everyone stands up, they are very tired, everyone is very tired, but the effect will not be obvious, but in real life, there are many theater models, especially school education, there are many theater models, crazy homework, tide of make-up classes, embarrassing teachers, domineering famous schools, such some theater models, which make people very tired, but what about later?

Maybe it's the same effect as before, but it just makes people feel very tired, remember that the country's regulations are to be 6 years old when entering primary school, which is very beneficial to the teaching of students, but what about later?

When everyone knows, we still require all primary school students to be at least 6 years old in order to read the first grade, and some schools finally require 7 years old to be in the first grade, so after a few years of development, there is a school that allows students to be 10 years old before they can read the first grade, so it's a bit too much, not to mention other problems, just read such a problem, at the beginning of the school, the effect may be obvious, those 10-year-old children and those 6-year-old children compete, of course it will be much better, but why don't you think about some future issues, when students graduate from college, how old are they, how do they find a job, how to stabilize their families, these many problems are not considered, just for the current results, just for the temporary source of students, is this really good?

However, after such a theater model, we will also find a lot of problems, under the interpretation of the theater model, we will become decadent, especially some teachers for teaching performance, there will be some opportunistic things happening, although this happens, for example, some political teachers, will let students memorize, even the lecture time has been shortened, it was a very beautiful classroom, but it has become a dry back, children are only in the recitation, there is no freshness at all, a long time will increase the child's disgust with school, but they often do not consider such a situation, always feel that good grades are the best evidenceIs education really like this?

Where did all those lively classes go? They have gradually lost their interest and passion in the classroom, and have become simple recitation, so if it continues, I think it is not good for the development of students, just for the sake of temporary teaching performance, they often do this, for example, when we were in high school, there was a teacher, her teaching mode is the sea of questions, if it is the third year of high school, it is still very good to do more exercises, but the subject she teaches is not the third year of high school, but the second year of high school, there are still some differences between the third year of high school and the second year of high school, and the third year of high school is for the college entrance examination, and some training is still very good, but what about the second year of high school？

There are a lot of knowledge points, or when the foundation is laid, but such a teacher, she doesn't teach much knowledge every time, but lets us students do test questions, like a mock exam like the third year of high school, so that every time the exam is down, although the final score is very good, this teacher is still rated as an excellent teacher, but what about us students?

It was a very beautiful class, but in the end it all became a memorization, practice, writing, writing, writing, and writing, so I also found that there were a few troublemakers in the class, so I didn't like to take English classes, every time I went to class, I always read extracurricular books, and I spent a class like this, and then the results can be imagined, but the hateful thing is that if it goes on like this, several other teachers don't have the heart to teach well, which disrupts the teaching mode they originally identified, and it is also like this teacher who makes students memorize, and then desperately do exercises, and so on, when everyone is the same, there is no big difference in grades, there will not be such a big difference between good and bad grades, and their hearts will be more balanced.

So in real life, there are also many cases where the theater model is like this, like a lot of times, the examples I gave above, in such examples, the theater model will become more and more intense, and everything will develop in a bad direction, but will it go on like this?

What are the consequences of such a discovery, but because their theater model will cause temporary results, they will also insist on doing this without considering the consequences, and some leaders will not care about their actions in the long run, whether the disadvantages outweigh the advantages or the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, so that no one will think about what the consequences will be, so they will continue like this with peace of mind, and the cycle of the theater model will continue to exist like this, and no one will pay attention to what the final result is, and then it will be？

Of course, it's getting worse and worse.