The first time I heard that this information can be sold for money, it is really strange, and the profession of journalist is also a strange industry, intelligence can be sold in a bright way, and there are so many needs, as a writer, is to sort out the information given by reporters, try to express it as briefly as possible, and then submit it to the newspaper layout designer, I am not responsible for judging whether this information is useful or not.

I also don't judge whether the information submitted to me by the reporter is true, it is the reporter on the scene who is responsible for the authenticity, this is their responsibility, and if I exaggerate, untrue description, the situation described is different from the information, and the words do not reach the meaning, this is my responsibility.

Although I have said this, I feel that these reporters are crazy, how can this information be true, just like the report about an old woman who got up in the morning to go to the chicken coop to get eggs, and then turned around and thought that the egg was born by herself, such a ridiculous thing, the reporter narrated that there may be confusion in people's memory, this nonsense, this memory is not chaotic, since the reporter is responsible for the authenticity of the scene, I can only describe it truthfully, by the way, this may be fake, just do your duty, I can't care about the rest, there are more such news, the newspapers are published, and it seems that this kind of information sells better。

Look at the letters sent by those readers, and say that he sometimes does this. Say, I don't believe this thing will happen, why haven't I encountered this kind of thing, this should be fake, real information, fake information seems to be able to sell for money, it's really messy.

If this rooster lays eggs, this kind of news, I think it is reasonable, but whether this reporter really saw this kind of thing with his own eyes, it is not clear, sorting out this material, I will mark it, according to the data, this news is still possible.

As long as someone reads it, someone reads it, it means that someone buys it, so that there is money to be made, and the sales volume is large, that is, the influence is great, and the information can be transmitted and radiated out on a large scale, so that the added value of the newspaper is great, and the income of advertising and the like can also rise.

These are just some of the information I know, for practitioners, these basic information of the industry still need to know, so that they can also know a direction for future promotion, know their own work content, and the possible future development direction.

The second time I saw all kinds of information, it was original information, it had not been cut and edited, and I also had to suffer a lot of junk information, because of professional discipline, this information was not allowed to be disclosed, and the information I came into contact with was not very important, and important information may be directly submitted to senior personnel by senior reporters.

This unimportant information, bizarre and weird, is still quite good as a pastime, although I have become numb from the novelty at the beginning, and I don't know if those who buy newspapers have long been numb, so what information do they want from newspapers?

Why do these things attract their attention so much, is it the spirit of onlookers? Think about yourself, maybe it is the monotonous circle of life around you, your own small circle of life, just want to see what is happening in such a big world.

Although it is all irrelevant information, and there is no useful information, it is still followed by them, and it is not clear that one day this information disappears, or they have no interest in this information, what will happen? It should be a return to the old life, the previous way of life, and it has no effect.

In the past, I didn't receive so much information, read books, go to teahouses to listen to other people's bragging, see and hear some local happenings, that's all, and the rest of the time I also worked to make money. I believe that when the information that has been transmitted from far away disappears, or when people no longer read it, life will return to the past.

After the news, is there anything different in this life? Has there been any change? At least people have seen more things, more things to emulate, know some things that can be used to improve their lives, what can be done, and also want to travel outside to see, or go out to find a better job life.

Anything else has changed? The transparency of information increases, the ignorance may be reduced, and the low-level fooling is also reduced, as for being fooled by the high-level, there is no way to do it, there is a lot of information in itself, and there are really real reports, and there is no one to see anything, it is all realistic description sentences, and no one is next to the analysis, it is not possible to see anything, if there is not a lot of relevant information on hand, a lot of information can not see what these are, what will be the effect, what will be the effect after the release is made public, what is the effect。

People who want to review must be thinking about such a situation, what impact it will have, what effect it will have, it will not just say, everything will be put out publicly, nothing will be cared for, no matter what impact it has, what effect it has, as long as it can be sold and make money, if this is the kind of thinking, then the newspaper will not have any manipulative propaganda power.

There may be moderation and there may be the power to manipulate propaganda, this is just power, being mastered by good people will make the world a better place, being mastered by evil people, that being fooled, or being manipulated emotionally, just like that. If it is not reviewed and sent out, it will also be more chaotic, fake news, and some news with a bad impact, which transmits negative energy.

In fact, I am also very curious, how do they review it, why can they judge that this information will have a bad impact? Do they have this kind of experience? Have they seen the bad impact of this kind of information delivery? Or do they just think that the guess may be bad, so they don't put it.

This is also possible, this kind of review without standards, judging by personal experience, there are also many problems, just like I guess this is fake news, should not be delivered, in fact, when they review, they think that there is no impact, so they put it, as long as it does not have any bad impact, or some fake news has a positive impact, it will be delivered, this is not good, since it is fake, then it cannot be delivered, set a standard.

And some real news, real news, if the impact is not good, whether it should not be put on, just like it will affect the image of the government, if it is really done, a lot of information will not be able to be understood by relevant personnel, so that a song and dance, thriving phenomenon.

From the very beginning, the standard was set, fake news is not allowed, real news can be delivered, because this is information, the organization is prescribed like this, and the professional discipline I received is also like this, I don't know why this is done above, maybe it is like what was said at the beginning of professional discipline, information is intelligence, and intelligence must be true.

Who needs real information? Everyone needs it, everyone who reads it, they don't need false information, it will be wrong, so a column is opened in the newspaper, which is to put false information, or some uncertain information, purely to see and laugh, to entertain, and it is possible to expand the role of thinking.

I have seen that page, there are stories and so on, often sometimes when there is really a lot of information, this page is not placed, free adjustment, because of the cost, the newspaper text description must be accurate and easy to understand, and the number of words is required to be small.

When can you write in a large space, the language of the description is simple and easy to understand, there can be a large number of pictures and the like, I heard that such a system is already being built, it can spread quickly, there is no need for paper or the like, anyway, I don't understand it, I just know that there is such a system, it seems that it will take a long time to build, and in the war years, it is still a question whether such a system can be launched.

Exposed to so much information, I also summed up some rules of life, honest people are bullied, do not know how to resist, always send anger to the family, bad temper at home, easy to hurt the family, especially when they do not recognize their own situation, this will often happen, this is also a tragedy, the tolerant family knows that he is angry outside, and also bears their harm to themselves, because there are many family members who are also honest people, and they are the kind of honest people who have cognition.

From this, we can see that human nature cannot be suppressed, and it will always be released, just like a moving substance, and it will find a gap to release it when it is deformed to a certain extent. When it comes to deformation, some people can't hold back their inner feelings, so they want to express it, and before someone has expressed it, first describe the language in addition to the real scene description, everything else is expressing his feelings, and from the language description, you can see what the person feels when he expresses it, which is the feeling in the interpretation language, and has little to do with the meaning of the words.

An object has a certain velocity, according to the principle of constant relative velocity and constant relative distance, when there is no other collision and extrusion, the relative distance may be a fixed value, which is a state of being, from another description, this is a deformation recovery state, that is, if someone makes this relative distance smaller, the relative velocity will also change, and at the same time the object must bear the deformation, that is, bear the deformation pressure from a large circle to a small circle, if it can withstand it, it can become a small circle, otherwise it will be broken。

If the relative distance increases, does the deformation force decrease? It seems to be so, but it seems to be wrong, the relative distance increases, and the relative velocity increases. The relative distance becomes smaller, and the relative velocity becomes smaller. But for the relative frame of reference A, which is slow, if you want the relative distance to be larger, you have to give the object B more velocity, and if you want the relative distance to be smaller, you have to slow down the object B.

There is also a scenario where when the relative frame A is fast, you want to slow down object B if you want the relative distance to be larger, and when you want the relative distance to be smaller, you need to give object B a greater velocity. This will lead to interesting phenomena, and there will be many interesting discoveries in analyzing the trajectory of objects using this theory.

Is the relative velocity unchanged and the relative distance unchanged? Is it a rule that a moving object necessarily needs to obey? Because the relationship between the rotation speed and the trajectory of the linear velocity must be obeyed, and the way to change this rule is to change the various velocities of matter and the angle between them.

That is not to admit that matter exists independently, any matter with velocity is an independent entity, because they have velocity, exhibiting different trajectories, and the study of these trajectories leads to a consistent conclusion that the relative velocity is constant, the relative distance is constant, and the application of changing the relative velocity and changing the relative distance can also be obtained.

Things seem to be connected, plus the superposition of rotation speed and linear velocity to produce circular motion, as well as various superposition states to form various types of matter, and there is linear velocity has mass, only the rotation speed may sometimes be due to the problem of measurement means, the mass cannot be measured, as if it is a static cosmic background.

Is there a rotating substance, or is there a linear velocity, or both necessarily need to occur at the same time? Because an independent matter exists because of the existence of rotation, and if it is only a linear velocity, this cannot be called a substance.

The miraculous thing, this first has a rotating substance, or there is a linear velocity, is it an imitation of the first chicken, or the first egg, this statement has formed the above logical idea, language, no matter how much I praise you, I can't overstate it.

There is this connection, or one day someone will figure out the order of chickens and eggs, and then we will discuss whether there is a rotating substance first, or whether there is a linear velocity first, in fact, this is far from over, because the problem of chickens and eggs is solved, and we still have to find out how chickens or eggs came about, and when will this be the end?

In fact, it is possible for two linear moving fields to collide to get a rotating substance, just like it is possible that a certain animal has been suppressed for too long, and one day it is mad and finds an animal that is not the same kind, you know, it may have produced chickens, and then there are eggs, and the evolution of mutation may not exist, but two different chemical reactions may exist, just like bacterial mutation is not a spontaneous mutation, but a reaction to a certain drug, maybe this animal eats something or reacts with the environment to produce an organ that lays eggs, these can happen, I am definitely a genius among geniuses, ^_^。

Next time, I will find out what this field is, the universe is actually generated by the collision of two fields, this must find out what the field is, otherwise it is impossible to repay the wish, the wish is a kind of beginning and end of the trajectory, that is, to start thinking about this, it is necessary to find the answer to the end, and you can't deceive yourself, you haven't found the answer, you have found the answer.

The independence of matter does not mean that the universe is not continuous, because there are still fields, and there are many existences that we cannot touch now, and things are not clear, if the field is the ripples of plane space, what will happen if we think about this assumption?