At the end of the year, in the midst of busy overtime, I was pulled to be a substitute for production, and I sent the last one to inform readers that if there is no accident next year, we will continue to write.

If the exchange rate is calculated by the total amount of gold in circulation between countries, then in fact, the two countries are equivalent in terms of the price of goods, but for the cost of population, a country has a large population, then according to the supply and demand relationship of the market, labor wages are also low, so as to have a competitive advantage, is the competitive advantage of labor-intensive products, which is to describe the competitive advantage of trade products between the two countries.

For countries with large populations, the total amount of gold in circulation is evenly distributed to individuals is relatively small, and the consumption level is also low, for the same commodity, the consumption power is low, and the standard of living will not be high, so it is necessary for the country to increase the total amount of gold in circulation, and it is useless to print money, and it is impossible to improve this consumption situation.

How did the gold come from, dug it up by itself, and it was settled from other countries. This is very strange, isn't digging gold and settling foreign exchange from other countries also considered printing money? No, digging gold and settling foreign exchange with other countries can only be used as gold reserves, and cannot be circulated, otherwise something will happen, this is determined by the total amount of commodities in a country, if the currency is well coordinated with gold, the society will be relatively stable, otherwise there will be problems in the total amount of various commodities.

Development is a process, can not be mutated, through printing money or plundering gold, digging gold can not change this fact, but development is also a process of increasing the total amount, if there is no gold reserves, the total amount of commodities will not increase.

There is no problem with issuing currency, there is no problem with the amount of issuance, the key is the problem of distribution, if a large amount of money is issued, that is to say, the rich will be very rich, and the poor will be very poor, because it is determined by distribution, so there will be a problem with over-issuance of currency, which is to make a long-term problem become a problem that occurs in a short period of time, and this unfair distribution system can run for a hundred years under this total amount of money, and as a result, you have doubled the currency, and it may only run for 50 years The society will end, and there will be no money to survive at the bottom, and there will inevitably be an uprising war。

Therefore, if the distribution problem cannot be solved, the more the social problem develops, the more unstable it becomes, the good regulation and control, that is, the good operation of gold and currency, and the good operation of trade from other countries, maybe it is just to extend the existence of a little time, and eventually there will be problems, at this time, if you want to be stable, you can only come forward to fight the local tyrants, release the money of the rich to the poor, let them live, or change to another more extreme means, slaves appeared, the state allowed the slave system, so that the poor became slaves in order to live, but only extended the existence of time, and eventually the country will collapse, if the rich do not care about the poor, the poor can recognize and know this, will not wait for these situations to happen, but will rise up and fight before they happen.

The change of the distribution system to make the distribution of social wealth more reasonable is only a means of continuing to exist, and it may continue to exist for a longer time, but if science and technology, the army develops well, and it continues to exist for a long time, it is also a means for a country to eventually unify the whole world, which is the beginning of a strong country.

It's just that after unification, there will also be this problem, so all the bets are placed on science and technology, obtaining material from nature, science and technology is indeed a very important means, this universe is very large, if science and technology really develop to a certain extent, there is no problem in supporting a group of people, as for restricting population development, it is also a means, but it is difficult to say whether this restriction is good or bad, and it is possible that many scientific and technological talents cannot be produced.

When narrating, you will always be unable to restrain your anger feelings, that is, you will be angry about this kind of thing from the perspective of the past, so as to bring your own emotions into it, narrating some accusations that seem to be righteous, and it is not pretending to be angry, if it is pretending to be angry, the language will be somewhat restrained, and it will not be so-for-tat.

Summarize what kind of person you are from these things that make you really angry, which will obviously see your temperament, the camp you belong to, anger can reflect a person's true temperament, and look at what this person will be really angry about, you can see what kind of person he really is.

In fact, people who can restrain their emotions, it's really hard to see what kind of person this is, it's a bit messy, and I sighed again, if a person is always right, it's really scary, and it's also scary, and it's also a kind of survival wisdom to be able to make small mistakes often, so that people can see it.

These survival wisdoms, perhaps survival smarts, can make this person survive better, and because there are so many survival smarts, the relationship between people in this society has become very complicated, so that people who see it feel tired.

There is a conflict between man and nature, and this conflict has a buffer of time, that is to say, after man destroys nature, there is a buffer existence for the outbreak of conflict between man and nature, and the natural consciousness resists relatively slowly, just like a person who is too huge, from the emergence of the conflict to the action response is a little slow.

When there is a conflict between people, it is instantaneous, and sometimes some people also buffer this conflict and explode later. From this point of view, nature also seems to be conscious, but this kind of consciousness feedback takes a long time.

Putting aside the small concepts of nation, race, and human beings, and narrating the fate of the entire human race, positive actions are all efforts for the continuation of the destiny of mankind, and all efforts are made to ensure that no one can get rid of this fate, as long as it is not an act of destruction, perhaps an act of destruction sometimes becomes an effort for the continuation of the existence of mankind.

Many people's perspective may not be to serve people or existing individuals, but in fact to serve the continuation of the fate of human beings as a whole, and individuals have become a kind of victim, and it is impossible to say whether they are only enjoying the sacrifice or those who are working hard are the victims. From the point of view of feelings, personal feelings, it is certainly good to make yourself miserable, it is to sacrifice yourself, to make yourself happy is to serve yourself, from the perspective of personal life, sacrifice is death, and everything that makes you die is wrong.

In this tide of fate, what an individual can do is to master the balance of this boat, so that the boat keeps getting bigger, or has been mastering the balance, no matter how big the ship, if it does not master the balance, it will be drowned by the tide of fate, and no one is an exception.

I forgot to mention that my profession is a reporter, this is a part-time profession, that is, after the news comes out, I find a job to earn some extra money, there is not much technical content, that is, when the newspaper is adopted, I can get some money.

Gold can only be used as a reference system for the total amount of national currency, but not as a reference system for the wealth of the people of the country, because of the distribution method, the flow of money and gold is towards the rich, when the rich have more demand for gold, it means that they have more money, and at the same time the poor must have less demand for gold, because they have less money, to buy other items, they have to sell all the gold they have, the country can not see the wealth of the people by looking at the total amount of gold issued.

Therefore, no matter how to change the distribution mode is imminent, the more later, the more difficult it is to change, the strength of the country does not lie in the strength of the rich, but the strength of the whole nation, on the consumption capacity, the people are stronger than the rich, and without consumption, there will be no development, the total amount of social wealth will not rise, as the manager of the country, will not hope that such a situation will occur, so they encourage the rich to invest in creating jobs, in fact, the national consumption capacity is still limited, even if investment is encouraged, the national consumption capacity can not be improved, because this is determined by the distribution system, investment is to be returned, and the wealth created by the society still flows to the richThe natural resources are rapidly depleted because of increased investment, a large amount of investment has only created waste products, useless consumer goods, the main national consumption capacity is also limited, and the money obtained can only consume survival goods, so that the social useless consumer goods have been in excess of investment, so that the enthusiasm for investment has actually slowly disappeared, and the total amount of social wealth can not be improved.

The only way to change the mode of distribution is to re-change the mode of distribution, to wash the total wealth of the society, to change the mode of distribution, there is a violent means to fight the local tyrants, and the other is to construct another economic means of the distribution mode, so that the old rich will either not keep the original wealth and do not join this distribution economy, or they will join this distribution economy to invest, and rob this small profit consumption points service economy.

Maybe they will use power or violence to hinder this new way of distribution, and eventually it will evolve into violence, but it is obvious that they will lose the wealth they had before in the violence, and they think that they will accept this new way of distribution, if they are no longer rational, then things are irreparable, and eventually war will break out, this is certain, predicted, and confirmed by history.

Historical insurrectionary wars are low-level violent wars that cannot survive, and when they foresee that they can no longer survive, they cannot survive the war of resistance on a small scale and cannot defeat the whole country, and when they cannot survive on a large scale to resist the war, they can defeat the whole country.

The resistance to foreign invasion was originally a matter of the state, and the national resistance was not effective, and the cost of the war was transferred to the people at the bottom, so that the people at the bottom could not survive anymore and had to rise up to fight, but in the name of fighting, in addition to resisting foreign invasion, there was also a declaration of war on the corrupt country, and those religious names and the like were all for the sake of courage, fighting in the name of justice, in fact, removing these names, all people fought, because they could not survive without fighting.

As for becoming strong and invading other countries, this is the decision of the country's management, in fact, the pain is also borne by the people at the bottom, the taxes and their relatives and soldiers, but it may be because they are strong, life is still gone, the sacrifice is not very big, not scoped, so it is not their business, and because the struggle is ineffective, they finally invaded, what if they don't support it, and they can't see the country's strategy, saying that it is to protect them, saying that it is to fight terrorism, saying that it is for a better life, the reasons are all credible, then only believe, time will tell, can only be understood in this way, and if it is a victory, it should be celebrated, grief is left to those who are related to the deceased relatives, maybe they can earn a pension, and there is nothing to say, fear and pain are left to the one who was killed by a bullet, but when he dies, there is actually nothing left.

If you can't change the facts, if you can't find a way to manage the whole world better, then the people who see it resonate and do what they should do.