Just take a break
"The invasion of the elves has stopped the war between good and evil, and you and I have a chance to meet here. "The righteous quickly made an appointment with the evil speed, and met in a no-man's land. Justice wants to know the answer to something.
"You don't want me to be obedient, even though you and I look the same, it's impossible. "Evil is coming to the appointment because it's too boring, and the elven invasion has caused all activities to stop.
"I haven't thought about it at all, since I can't adapt to evil, then you definitely can't adapt to justice. Once a person is infected by the elves, the body will be controlled by the elves, this is the test box, you test it. "Righteous quickly threw a box to evil.
"Welfare is still justice, we are just passively carrying out administrative orders, isolating, and waiting for the symptoms to appear before being tested. "Evil Speed tested himself, and it turned out that reality was not infected by the elves.
"Everyone tests with test boxes, it's a huge project, there aren't so many test boxes, and there aren't so many people monitoring the test results, justice is also administrative directive segregation. "Honesty is a righteous quality.
"You ask me out, don't just send me a test kit. "Evil thinks a lot about everything, and most of it thinks about conspiracy.
"I used to have something to do, but now I can't remember anything, so I'll just talk casually. After the Elven invasion is over, we can't be like this. Righteous quickly tried to think about it, and indeed forgot something.
"What have we forgotten? is the information of our background?the secret of the elves?or the secret of this world?" Evil Speed always felt that he didn't know any information, and even if he heard it, he only knew the words, far away, without personally participating in it, without seeing it personally, it was just a bunch of information defined by text communication.
"Neither. You disguise yourself as me, I disguise yourself as you, and go to each other's camp to survive, how about it?" Righteous quickly remembered the reason why he was about to be evil, and suddenly had such an idea, and then wanted to do it strongly.
"What's the benefit?" Evil Speed didn't feel the proposal, but since the other party had a need, maybe he could get what he wanted.
"For example, the benefits of righteousness that you believe in. "Justice has begun to get into the role.
An incompatible world that serves the people and serves itself, where the rules do not protect both sides fairly, are extreme social constructs. Allowing the legitimacy of the activities of both sides, this is a relatively normal society, and there is no violent competition under the protection of the rules, and time will give the answer to who will survive.
Both the righteous world and the evil world are obviously extreme social structures, and it is hard to believe that the righteous speed can survive the evil world, and the evil speed can survive the righteous world. It was the righteous speed who came up with this idea, what exactly did he want to do? Was it just an idea and then wanted to do it?
Under the action of time, the body has formed many circulatory systems, most of which are for the body to continue to exist, but there are several circulatory systems that are destroying the body, which can only be said to be imperfect when they are naturally formed, and those circulatory systems that destroy the body have yet to evolve into part of the body's services.
After pressing the elves to invade, the serum that defeats the elves to form immunity can effectively fight the elves. If this is true, then all other kinds of elves can also be effectively eliminated with serum, so there is no long-term carrier of elves that cannot be cured.
It is so difficult to control the progress of chemical reactions? It is simple to control the progress of chemical reactions, and if you know the principle, you can basically control them. However, if it is to manipulate the group chemical reaction, it is more difficult, let one molecule have a chemical reaction, and prevent other molecules from having a chemical reaction, if it cannot effectively induce cluster separation, it is basically difficult.
If words are just a phenomenon triggered by a sensation triggered by our memory storage after intensive training, then words are not our consciousness, words are not our consciousness, it is the feeling point that is our consciousness, or the feeling point is not our consciousness, but only a sensing response to the outside world.
Then our civilization is not words, it is a factual phenomenon, our consciousness is also a factual phenomenon, words are just a tool that we use to try to describe factual phenomena, this tool is not particularly easy to use, symbols and numbers are better to use, actual images and so on will be better to use.
How do we describe factual phenomena in such uneasy terms? This is, of course, because this is an easy-to-use, universally used communication tool. We describe, we describe factual phenomena more clearly in words, and others can understand them, and that becomes very important.
So can we really use this text to describe the factual phenomena clearly? Are we sure to describe them clearly? The most important thing is that the person who is watching can understand exactly what I am describing? Why do we describe these factual phenomena?
Facts and phenomena are in reality, so can they not see them? Facts have proved that they should not be able to see them, but many of us ourselves cannot see them. But why do we describe the factual phenomena we see? This is a question, why?
We record it, but we can't remember it? No, the fact is an inspiration and then it disappears, and we don't see it next time. Inspiration is so hard to repeat, they just disappear and then they can't remember it again, inspiration is the reaction of our senses to the fact of fact.
This shows that the feeling of seeing the world is the only one in many cases, and that time and all other states have changed, and that the truth may not change, but there will be no more inspiration, or that there will be no more inspiration when we see the truth.
The strange thing, why we have so many inspirations and then record them in this book, is it because we are thinking? Feelings change violently, so that the frequency of inspiration increases, and these are just different feelings about the truth.
Thinking is the process by which we collide with the information we get from the truth of the fact with various feelings, and the information that is unique and excites us is inspiration. We also get a lot of information, and this information is described by us, which is these literal descriptions.
It is clear that we are excited, and the information that is called inspiration is scarce, and everything else is as ordinary as the textual description. But the inspiration information we describe is not reflected in one word, one sentence, sometimes it is the whole article, and the people who read it only get this inspiration information that makes them excited and understand. And then they get it, they know what we're describing.
We are not describing words, but a message of inspiration, which is the core, the message we want to deliver. What we convey is the information that the person who sees it understands, we are not transmitting words, we are transmitting knowledge, or passing on the actual facts and phenomena that we feel and see.
This factual phenomenon is transmitted to the person who sees this description, and this person includes ourselves. And most of this information is passed on to ourselves, and when we see what we describe, whenever we look at it, we will immediately understand it, which means that there is a system in these written descriptions that is appropriate to our feelings, is this our sensory structure?
There is a sensory structure in it, and there is also a structural arrangement of textual reinforcement training. We know it's in the book, but we also find the fact that we don't have the ability to distill these structures. It's a huge puzzle that we haven't overcome yet.
We describe our own feelings, describe the laws of the truth of the external reality, but we do not have a pictorial real description of the real reality of the outside world, and others cannot see or feel what the real picture around us is at the present moment.
Can you really describe what exists around us, what kind of changes, still lifes, dynamics? It's not difficult, why don't we describe it? It's the relationship between the momentary moment and the time spent describing, we don't want to spend a lot of time describing the scene of the current moment, we feel that this has no meaning, and we feel that there is nothing to describe.
If we describe the scene around us realistically, and describe our instantaneous feelings, wouldn't that be more conducive to resurrecting us? But how can instantaneous sensations simultaneously depict the real scenes around us? This is almost impossible, and instantaneous sensations are instantaneous moments, and it takes time to even type a word.
Doesn't describe the scene around us, but just records our feelings, so that it can resurrect us? This answer is something that only we know, and only after we practice it. It is questionable whether the eternal life of the total consciousness or the immortality of the body will be the immortality of the body, the transfer of memories, and the structure of the senses.
It's useless to doubt, practice makes it clear. How do you get the sensory limit scale and the sensory response scale? The sensory limit scale can make it full, and it can also give the resurrected humanoid the maximum potential, so it's not a problem. Dissatisfaction with the sensory limit moment may be one of the reasons for the existence of different people, and perhaps it is also important.
How to obtain a person's sensory response scale, that is, the response intensity of a person's sensor to various levels of stimuli in the outside world, this should be measurable, as long as a standard scale is measured, make a humanoid, transplant the memory data, and then transplant the sensory response scale, a person's consciousness will be transplanted, and there is no technical difficulty in creating humanoids.
I have to think about the things that have to be done, how to achieve physical immortality after being able to achieve conscious immortality, if we can achieve physical immortality, we will not practice conscious immortality, and now there is still time to think about this question, if in the end there is still no way, will we just practice conscious immortality, will it be just a matter of writing a program?