It's just that I rethought about the data calculation that I had denied before, and thought of the effect of doubling the energy and the effect of doubling the energy, so is the effect of 1 plus 1 2, but is not, sometimes there is a greater effect than 2, sometimes it is a smaller effect than 2, and sometimes it is the effect of 2.

Thinking in this way, considering the use of strict mathematical logic, the data correction number X must be added, that is to say, the current formula is 1+1=2+X, and the number X is also an experimental number, a phenomenon number, or a loss number, or a gain number, that is to say, if this fusion X is brought in the number operation process, it is correct, this is the correction number of mathematical logic, and it is also regarded as a phenomenon number.

For the division of 1, just like a quarter, this correction number also needs to be added, regardless of whether 1 can be divided infinitely or not, such a correction number is required, otherwise the formula will not be valid empirically or phenomenally, or if this correction is not used, mathematics is just an imperfect pure theory with zero correction number.

If you add a correction number, that is, you can use this correction number to generate a new thing 1, that is, 1+1=1 will be true, because the correction number exists, and the loss, or gain, and this is a phenomenon number, there is no definite number, and the experimental phenomenon is used to determine the approximate data, there is a fusion effect, that is, no matter how it is changed, as long as the correction number X is added to the final data.

However, because this correction number is the dimension number of time, that is, it is possible to be a certain number at one moment and become another number in the next moment, which makes this correction number very uncertain, whether it is really the case, is it an impermanence, or can it be determined by continuous phenomenal experimental observation? Or because time cannot be divided to the limit, and the specific value of this correction with time change cannot be determined, only at a certain time, can we determine what the specific number of corrections is?

If mathematics eventually becomes like this, this will make some people fall into madness, because the correction number has become an indefinite number, and some things are clear, since this is the case, sometimes don't dwell on this correction number, this may be the existence of the disordered factor of the universe, after all, no one wants a completely orderly universe, complete order means that the fate is destined, the possibility of control exists, as long as there is such a correction number, or the disordered factor of the universe exists, the universe has become very beautiful.

In fact, the existence of this disorder factor, that is, the existence of the correction number, gave me a great curiosity to find out what kind of existence this is, so that the rigorous logic of mathematics is no longer valid, that fate is uncontrollable, and that time is not continuous, at least in her body.

What exactly is this? It can also be said that when we observe, the number of corrections in the results of the phenomenon displayed in front of us is also the data obtained through our constant observations, and this data may be uncertain due to observations, that is, the non-replicable data, observed in the same way at different times, whether the data is not the same.

This has led to various speculations, and the number of corrections can only be said to be that we are in the universe, and we have an effect on the object of observation, and if we jump out of this cosmic observation, or use theory to deduce, this data may always be certain, as long as we add comprehensive consideration.

Then this correction number is just a phenomenon that appears because of our observation in the universe, or just a phenomenon caused by the limited definition of human beings, and there is nothing, after jumping out of this cycle, acknowledging the incorrectness of mathematics, and thus unifying the whole theory, perhaps this fog does not exist.

In order to correspond mathematics to phenomena, this correction number must be added, and mathematics after adding the correction number will feel the uncertainty of the correction data in the phenomenon, which is really a fun thing, which is found by human beings themselves, and wants to use mathematics to describe the inevitable result of the phenomenon.

In fact, there is one thing that is still confused so far. Why is the unknown known to me? Is it just that the information is received by me and known by my special processing? The strange thing is how did this information come to me? How can I get new knowledge in the book after processing?

Information comes to me randomly, because of the frequent flow of information, basically a lot of information will flow in front of me and be seen by me. And I can't think of all the new knowledge right now, and if I can do that, I'm too good.

I can only rely on this information every day to gain new knowledge, and on top of the new knowledge, I will get more new knowledge, and that's why. And why does this information come to me to get strange new knowledge, this information will definitely flow in front of others, and of course others will also get other strange new knowledge of their own, but no matter how you say it, you are more special.

Planets have their own rotation speed, if you want to break away from the planet on the planet, you must increase the speed to the extent that it exceeds the rotation speed of the planet, consider the concentric circles, the point on the straight line radiating from the center of the circle, turn the same angle, we don't need to describe the time here, the circle with a small inner diameter has a small distance to rotate, so that you can know that the inner diameter is small, the speed of rotation is small, so that the rotation speed is proportional to the distance to the center of the circle, that is, s=kv.

It is also very important to change the direction of the rotation speed, in order to fly, it must be perpendicular to the rotation direction of the planet, and to change the rotation speed of this object, perhaps you can consider changing the rotation device to an adjustable angle, so that you can control the direction. According to calculations, in order to fly, the rotation device used is a three-dimensional circle, which must be able to control the contraction, as long as the semicircle on the side of the planet's rotation direction exists, and the semicircle can be contracted by folding a fan.

A more detailed calculation formula may be needed here, in fact, the objects on the planet must have a rotation speed that is the same as the rotation direction of the planet, and to make the object lift upward, which is the so-called flying, it must be in the direction of vertical upward rotation, and in order not to produce vertical downward rotation, because a circle rotates, half of it is upward, and the other half of the direction is downward, so that if it is not processed, the whole system will still cancel it out, and the other half of the downward circle must be contracted, so that it can produce continuous upward speed。

However, is this kind of rotation that requires electricity to control more effective than chemical energy? Is there an advantage? This needs to be considered, after lifting, the heat generated by the rotation is converted into the energy of the jet, maybe it is also a kind of thrust, it is really not needed, it can be converted into electrical energy, so that the loss is only the material energy of friction, and the consumption may only be the material of friction, or the loss of heat energy caused by low conversion efficiency.

To be honest, if this frictional matter becomes electrons, atoms, or whatever, then the whole device will be smaller, and it will probably spin at a higher speed, much better than the coarse big matter, and it will be possible to build a flying saucer, or some other flying machine.

In fact, in the early stage, you can make a toy model, if it is feasible, maybe it is just some technical details from the toy model to the large model, so that for the toy, the value is reflected, and the value of the toy may exist in this way.