After all, there are some places where there is no magic array shielding, at this time, the powerful weapons of the high magic civilization will be brought into play, basically the same way of playing, precise strikes, more range of attacks magic array, so the victory or defeat is a matter of a moment, everyone releases the magic in one, two, three, and then waits for the result, if the two sides still have troops to continue to release magic, then continue to release, until all the high magic weapons are scrapped, depending on luck, if one side still has high magic weapons, the other side is gone, basically you can judge who will really win。

It's not that it's not about people, it's still relatively rare to have completely unmanned high-magic weapons, especially the judgment of the target for aim, which is carried out by people, and people will inevitably make mistakes, so that there is a probability of victory, and there are relatively few scenes that end up together. In battles with similar strengths, the outcome of a war depends on the mistakes made by people, and people make mistakes, and this kind of mistakes are often the key to winning or losing.

In fact, this kind of battle without the shield of the magic array, without the monitoring of the global unmanned puppet birds, and without blocking the enemy's sight, is very rare after all, if it appears, it should also be a problem of lack of equipment, a problem of logistics, a problem of money, and a problem of national strength.

The Global Golem Bird gives both the enemy a global view of the number, angle, and timing of powerful magic missile launches. These data are transmitted to the command ship, and these devastating magic missiles will be intercepted as much as possible, the more the probability of success in defense, the less loss on their side, the magic missiles on both sides will always be in a state of launch, at this time, if the reserve is a little more, then maybe it will win, for the amount of reserves, no one can estimate the accuracy, look at the draft of the ship, measure the size of the ship, calculate the estimate, and understand the performance parameters of this warship, which is very important for battlefield judgment, if it is not clear, it is blindly fighting, waiting for the judgment of victory。

Therefore, before the battle, both sides have studied the parameters of each other's warship weapons very thoroughly, and there is this layer of research, when the battle occurs, how much weapon data will be recorded by the opponent, so that the command ship can design tactics through these data, evade defense, let the opponent lose as much as possible, and make the loss of weapons on their side more likely to be less.

It all depends on the commander's personal style, for the magic array shielding, as well as confrontation monitoring, these are not used, it also depends on the situation of the battle, if you use it at the beginning, it means that the commander lacks command and combat ability for high magic civilization, he prefers to use cold weapons to fight, he is confident in his cold weapon combat, and uses his own advantages to fight against the enemy's disadvantages, then he must first unload the enemy's advantages.

At the time of the battle, the ability data of the commanders of both sides was also collected before, and the armament made a basic judgment through the unmanned puppet flying bird, who has all the data of the other party, then have confidence, otherwise there is no bottom in the heart when the first game is played, and when the hole cards come out later, it is not judged, and it is just a mistake in collecting intelligence before the war.

In front of the information that has been analyzed and marked as how to exploit its weaknesses, can the commander on the spot make preset tactics based on these data? I am afraid that preset arrangements have been made before the start of the campaign, and of course the enemy also has such preset arrangements, but these preset arrangements are made on the basis of the data collected earlier, and I am afraid that many of the on-site arrangements may have to be adjusted, and what if the intelligence data is wrong? This battle will become difficult, collect information on the spot, and respond quickly, which is also a test of the ability of a commander on the spot.

The attacking side of the battle has often completed the intelligence collection, while the passive defender may still be waiting for the intelligence information, at this time, it is said that it has lost the opportunity, and even if it goes up to fight, it will often fail, unless the other party has not collected any intelligence on its side, and just wants to attack.

Is it a more rational way of fighting, or is it a passionate way of fighting? Who relies more on luck? These do not need to be analyzed, but we must be clear about what method we want to use on our side, of course, it is the best way, and it will certainly be a more rational way of fighting, and we will definitely collect intelligence, and we will collect a lot of intelligence from the enemy in peacetime, not only on the enemy's, but also on our own side and on the friendly side.

Is this act of gathering intelligence for the purpose of preparing for an attack? Isn't it okay to prepare for a defensive offensive? This must be done both offensively and defensively, and how intelligence is ultimately used depends on how the actual world develops; it seems that there is no need to say much about this matter of collecting intelligence, and everyone knows that it is important, and how to collect it is also a matter of life and death infiltration by the two sides, and it must also be a matter of life and death infiltration, and ordinary people cannot look directly at the means inside.

On this basis, the Xinhe Battle that happened later, at that time, the equipment and support made according to the intelligence, basically if the troops were equal, it depended on the on-site performance, and it was also a matter for the personnel involved in the campaign, and mistakes would definitely exist, and one mistake with bad luck would be equivalent to destruction.

When land support is not possible, the Battle of New River will be fought in a very different way. Why do you want to carry out such a battle, is this kind of battle interesting? It's not very good to fight on the road, imagine the consequences of the waterway being controlled by the enemy, you can provide a powerful combat force in the air, you can carry out the delivery of logistics materials and personnel, and you can block the transportation and delivery of materials and personnel on your own side.

Isn't there still air and land transport? Indeed, there is, but the enemy also has the air, the cost of air transport, the waste of resources is very serious, the quantity of transport is limited, the land and the two sides are already fighting, if the land is also lost, it is a failure in itself, the waterway is controlled by others, and the air is slowly controlled, presumably the moment when the waterway is controlled by people, that is, when the air superiority is lost, then how to fight in the end, to fight a war of attrition on land, to consume the enemy with a large land and a large amount of resources.

Isn't it possible to successfully confront the war with the loss of waterways and airspace by virtue of land alone? This is also the case in history, and if you think about it, a war of attrition and a war that consumes materials and personnel, the ratio of battle losses is very high, and in the end it is won, but is it really won or fake in this invased battle? This is not clear, the enemy has suffered very few losses, and has plundered a lot of resources from the war.

However, when it comes to keeping one's own territory, the lost people can be born, the lost resources can be produced and dug up in the future, their leadership is still there, and the race has not been exterminated, so it makes sense to calculate it in such detail.

Then next time you will continue to be invaded by others like this, give up control of the water and air, the land attrition battle will always be won, your own leadership has always been there, the race has not been destroyed, you think of yourself as a winner, you are great, you have preserved the continuation of the race, as long as your race does not die, you will win the struggle, this leader's thinking is also very correct.

Ordinary warships, I won't describe them here, wooden, iron, alloy, there are some new magical space fog warships in the Xinhe Battle, that is, all attacks will penetrate the ship itself, as long as it doesn't hit people, it won't cause damage to the warship, and when it comes to this kind of magic warship, it can only go up to hand-to-hand combat.

There is also a kind of warship that devours both magic attacks and physical attacks, and it seems that in the end, the development of magic civilization still pulls people into hand-to-hand combat with cold weapons, and the defense ability is too strong, the neutralization of magical civilization weapons, and the lossless construction of magic tools, all of which push people to the face of hand-to-hand combat.

I couldn't figure it out, but I developed in a circle, and finally returned to the beginning. At the beginning of development, we must see the advantages of the tool, and then there is always the opponent who will resolve the advantage of the tool, others do not want the advantage to threaten themselves, so it is a kind of balance to move forward, in this continuous balance of development and interpretation, it is always necessary to balance and stability before it can exist, this is the will of nature, but also a rule of natural existence, the rule of rebalancing, detailed description, is always the rule that tends to be stable to continue to exist.

It is also a rule of time, the rule of the existence of time, time is expressed through the state of existence of an unchanging substance, otherwise there would be no concept of time, balance and stability can make a substance transient and unchanging, and time appears.

There is still a question here, this is just to say that the absolute eternity of time exists, and the changing existence of time does not also exist, the concept of time can not only be said to exist in absolute time, relative to time, and the amount of time that changes at the moment also exists, the dimension of time is probably not so simple, time itself embodies the eternity of absolute static, the one-dimensional nature of relative existence, and the intermittent connection of change, and the latter two are reflected in relation to the eternity of absolute stillness of time.

Is the spatio-temporal property of matter really a space-time property? Is it a spatial property, and it is only a spatial property of matter, but there is no temporal property? This is indeed a fact, and when matter removes the temporal characteristic, in fact, it is only showing the characteristics of space.

From the perspective of the process of the formation of space matter, the so-called spatial performance is the tearing void that the relative stillness of matter inevitably converges together according to the rule of constant relative velocity and constant relative distance, forming the spatial flow bubble of matter and material magnetic field.

Why can this unique space matter and the magnetic field space flow bubble of the material around it exist stably? What kind of scene is this birth like in the process of relatively static aggregation and tearing apart nothingness?

If this space matter cannot actually be defined by the big concept of matter, then it is actually just a convergence point of the vortex in and out of the bubble of magnetic field space flow, and the space is distorted, showing the flow characteristics of matter and magnetic field, and the space is distorted under the rule of relative rest.

It's just that in the void, there must be another side to the torn space, and what is the torn gap? It may be a kind of flow characteristic, which is nothingness, and the tearing out flow characteristics express the magnetic field space flow bubble, and the space material characteristics presented by the flow bubble aggregation vortex.

In fact, the world is a process of transformation and deduction of rest and motion, through a rule that must be observed that the relative velocity is constant and the relative distance is constant. If rest and motion are deduced by other rules, then what kind of rules can deduce rest into motion?

Stillness is like nothingness, there is no need to abide by any rules, any rules can be on her, but some rules can deduce the world, and some will never deduce the world, this is the fairness of existence.

The function of finding out the rules that can deduce the world in stillness is probably also to see whether the world is mixed with the deduction of other rules in addition to the deduction of one rule. Human beings just want to use these rules to help human beings survive and continue to deduce, and what else does human beings want besides eternal life? I am afraid that eternal life is the greatest desire of human beings, and after it is realized, according to the characteristics that human beings want, they will definitely have eternal happiness and enjoyment, no longer fear, these can be thought of, because human wants are very clear.

As for the two-dimensional world constructed by using the same relative speed and constant relative distance for the one-dimensional world, the use of the same relative speed and the same relative distance will evolve into a torn sine wave for the two-dimensional world, and the use of the same relative speed and relative distance for the two-dimensional world will also form a three-dimensional world because of extrusion, as for the use of this rule for the three-dimensional world, it is the state of motion of the superimposed state, just because it is assumed that the one-dimensional existence, this is itself problematic, there should be no space, nothing exists, so it is normal, the existence itself must be relative, otherwise it is very strange.