It's still too careless, and I don't know how carefulness and carelessness are cultivated, careless people should be anxious people, impatient people, don't look carefully, don't think carefully, want to train careless people into careful people, there must be someone who can suppress him and slowly grind his temperament.

We are also careless people, we can only cultivate our own carefulness, how to cultivate, but also slowly in practice, first learn to be really modest, cowardly, and then when others propose to look carefully and think carefully, really take a closer look and think carefully.

In the actual process, we will always forget this matter, and we will always carry on so carelessly, we deeply realize that this thing has happened, don't you say that you are careful? Indeed, it is really a truth, a question of a word, do and see, we have done too much, maybe we have experienced too much of these, we have experienced too much of the process of things, we will forget, when doing it, this feeling of being careful will not appear at all, there is no vigilance at all when doing it, even if you keep telling yourself, be careful, in the end you will find that there is still something missing, which is attributed to our carelessness, is this the case?

From another point of view, we are really not gods, we can think about everything comprehensively, without missing details, there must really be someone who can do the details, presumably this person will not miss details in his life, presumably this kind of person does not exist, at least there is no such person around us.

But in comparison, there are really some people who are more careful than others, to admit this, there must be a standard, after comparison, there is a standard, the highest standard is an imaginary legend, the legend of God exists, it is impossible for people to do a maximum standard, but people can really have a comparative standard existence, the legend of God, the heart yearns for it, it is a very positive attitude, so that it can be continuously improved.

The Battle of Shahe was a sea-to-land battle, and it seems that some people were careless, and there were no warships here, so the battle here was sea-to-land, but why did they still fight like this? The warships could not run to land, so the battle was completely useless, and they only eliminated some land personnel. For warships, supply is always a difficult problem, to occupy an enemy port, that is a base, and the most convenient, the nearest base, in the face of discovering a rare opportunity, the Battle of Shahe took place, can the sea attack land really win? The sea is not well supplied, and no warship commander will attack the land, unless the land defense is very poor, and the intelligence gives the warship commander this information, so that he decides to do this, and those who support him to do so are probably also those land fighters behind him, and they can be here.

The landing is generally carried out in the sand, and it is best to cover it at night, when the tide is high, or when the tide is low, it depends on the number of people on the landing, as well as the size of the entrance.

The artillery on land should be divided into two waves, suppressing the guns of the warship, suppressing the assault boats, and on the land, in addition to the artillery, there are also magicians who rise into the air, and the magicians who rise to the ground are also divided into two waves, and the magicians who take off the warships will suppress the assault boats.

Originally, if there were warships and assault boats on land, this situation would not have occurred, but the enemy would have fallen into the phenomenon of insufficient support, and the Battle of Shahe would not have happened so easily, and the enemy's warship commander would have his own judgment, saying that the warship commander would make such an attack decision under the situation of great disparity in strength.

Theoretically, it is always a battle with the same strength on both sides, equipment, personnel, the ability of the commander, and the ability of the fighters are all said to be equal, but in fact it is difficult for this to happen, so some of the battles we actually see are always very dramatic, and the people who watch later always can't experience the situation at that time, always think that the strength of the two sides is equal, and always think that there are more people than the other side, why don't they win? There are many factors in it, and everyone only guesses what led to the history, but can only guess the causes, what kind of real process was it at that time? How many real processes have made history deduced to such an extent? People in the future cannot see it, and people today cannot have such a perspective to see it comprehensively.

In the Battle of Shahe, there are no magicians who have risen into the air, there are no on land, there are no warships, and the magic cannons on land can only attack the nearby assault boats, not the warships, and it is normal to be suppressed and beaten, plus the landing of the assault boats are all elite warriors, and the land battle is also a failure.

Disarming the prisoners of war, not only to remove their weapons, but also to deal with their commanders, but also to disarm their minds, to give them food, to let them work, to rearrange this defensive area according to their own ideas, to place powerful magic cannons, this is a stronghold for the transportation of friendly personnel and materials in the future, there is such a stronghold, it is much safer and more secure than on the sea, and there is also the ability to invade for a long time.

According to this, there is a superior living environment, so that the local residents come to work, such a good environment, how can the local residents withstand this temptation, there must be some to live, the people who have been oppressed by the local leaders will definitely pass when they have a better living environment, people yearn for a better life, as for the later deceived and exterminated, there is no way, all this happens, is the local residents not smart enough, or the local leaders' mistakes, maybe the invaders are also wrong, the local residents are just a fish waiting to be slaughtered。

The people who survive in such a gap of fear meet the commanders of the same local residents who are willing to think about them and draw a big pie of the future, and they begin a vigorous revolutionary process of serving the people, but this is also a deception in the end, and who is wrong? Why do leaders like to deceive others? It is normal for local residents to be deceived, and there is no reason not to go under the temptation of a better life.

It may be the fault of the local residents themselves, who do not have the ability to be one, who do not have the courage and ability to always place their hopes on others, hoping that others will bring them common prosperity, and they are deceived again. If they have the ability, can be self-reliant, believe in themselves, and work hard for a better world in their hearts, then who can deceive them, because they themselves are the leaders, and they are the achievers of their ideals.

However, it is said that these common prosperity words are put forward by the leader, in fact, no one believes it, everyone does their own, but after the life is not good, ridicule the leader, who calls the leader foolish, but some have become a tool of attack, a word has become a tool of attack, the words of the leader must come true to be considered a good leader, it seems to be defined like this, speaking is not responsible, basically has lost the character of the leader, and it is normal to be counted.

Therefore, it is true that leaders talk less and do more things. The plan always deviates in the end, but if there is no plan, the leader is more criticized by others, because everyone is not clear about what route the leader will take, and the route is not clear, then the people below are afraid and do not know what to do is right, so the leader always expresses the direction he wants.

It's just that the direction of the leader is what he wants, or for the interests of the whole country, or for the people in the country, and maybe there are other forces, and the leader represents what others want, not what he wants, then he must be tired.

What will it feel like to be on the battlefield, it means that the unique personal feeling when the person is really there, this feeling should be different, it will not be a relaxed feeling, nervous tension, tiredness, fear, the aftermath of the catastrophe, these words can make people feel the real battlefield? No, never, that kind of real feeling, but it really needs to be experienced on the spot.

Since you can't experience it, you can't experience it no matter how you think about it, so you can truly experience the feeling that you can experience, and then continue to write the world that can be imagined in the novel.

Do you believe that there are things you can't think of? You have to believe that there are too many things that a person can't think of, maybe we think of what you can't think of, and we can't think of what you see from your perspective, so you can't think of everything we can think of, and you can't think that we are very powerful, in fact, because you are based on what you can think of and then see us think of what you didn't think of, and then feel that you didn't think of it, then we thought of it, we are amazing, but sometimes we don't think of what you think.

Just like in the Battle of Shahe, if the commander of the warship did not think that the people on land would lay mines, the losses would be very large, and if he thought of it, he would go to investigate first, and then make a decision to fight, so if he thought of it, he would arrange to do it.

Do you really think about it, will you arrange to do it? Arrange for others to do it, then you must be willing, arrange yourself to do it yourself, you will always resist, arrange others to do it, and send someone to see if that person has done a good job, at first it is definitely not like this, at first I trusted this person, and then I found out that this person is unreliable, always did not do a good job, then send someone to check, but why not replace this person?

It's good to think about it, but when there are too many replacements, you find that these people always can't do well? It's so difficult to do a good job, this is a problem that people will really encounter, then there is really no way, so I arrange an inspection, and the result of the inspection is also unreliable, and this unreliability is definitely a feeling formed after doing things many times, because they don't satisfy themselves.

Since you want to be satisfied, why don't you do it yourself, but you find that you have done it, and you are even more dissatisfied, but you forgive yourself, you are not a professional, so in what aspect is you professional, and can you really be satisfied with what you have done professionally? If there are still outsiders who can check it, will outsiders feel that they are also doing poorly in the professional aspect?

There are too many people who don't know, but they always think that they know themselves, so why did they form this kind of civilization? It should also be because civilization does not know how to know, and civilization has not reached this level of knowledge at all, that is, it has not reached this level, and then it has always thought that it is knowing.