If you don't come into contact with those civilizational cognitions, but only your own experience, then what can you know? This is very interesting, if you strip those civilized cognitions from yourself, just your own experience, what kind of cognition will you give yourself? And how do you recognize this cognition, this experience is no longer possible, this feeling is no longer clear, then you can only watch those who have this experience, look at their behavior, guess their cognition.

If you don't have those civilized cognitions, but you just comprehend them from your own experience, then it should be a very pure cognition, a very simple cognition, is the surrounding environment so complicated? Even if there is such a complexity, can you recognize more complex situations with such a simple cognition? I'm afraid that as others say, the other party sold you, and you still help them count the money.

Civilization has made us more complicated, but it has also made it easier for us to survive in this society, is this really the case? Yes. Look at what kind of civilization cognition, that kind of false fantasy beautified civilization cognition will make us die faster.

The reality is staggered and woven by these civilization cognitions to form the current social situation, people are just the executive unit of civilization cognition, deduced in this huge civilization cognitive network, the people who jump out are just adding a silk thread to this civilization cognitive network, these civilization silk threads also have birth and death, the so-called birth is only in the existing civilization cognitive silk thread combined collision with other information output, the so-called death, but also from one strand to multiple strands, or merged into other civilization cognitive silk thread.

Putting aside these threads of civilizational cognition, is the physical structure of the world also like this? The time of material existence is intertwined into the current space-time, and continues to interweave the subsequent space-time. This involves the existence of matter, how is matter born, why does it exist? In this way, the relative velocity remains the same, the relative distance does not change, this is the essence of the existence of space-time, the relationship between time and space is this rule, there is this rule, space is torn from nothingness into existence and non-existence, matter is born, and time is born with matter in this tearing.

But why do rules exist, and why are these rules so powerful, that they can tear space apart from nothingness, form matter, form time, form motion, this is the rule that both rest and motion follow, and under this rule, stillness and motion transform each other, so why is there stillness and motion? Is it really a problem, and we were born to solve this problem? What we want is eternal life. If you grasp this rule and use it freely, why do those who have this ability have the key to eternal life?

In nothingness, apart from this rule, which has the power to tear apart nothingness, is there any other rule, and there is such a power to tear apart nothingness? Why does this rule exist? If it does not exist, then nothing exists, there is no time and space, there is no present, it is nothingness.

The real world exists, and that can only be said to be the rule. Nothingness and this rule, nothingness is an unimaginable existence, this rule is concrete, it can also be said that there are specific rules in this concept, and space-time is born, and the rules are actually essentially nothing, and there are many rules born in nothingness, all of which can exist in nothingness, but they really show their own rules, only this rule, she expresses her existence with the existence of space-time, and she is also the existence of nothingness.

Her appearance also made more of the rules of nothingness expressed, although we can't see their real figures, but they are in our minds. You, you, what message do you want to send to us, is it just your existence, or do you show us love, what kind of love is it?

What are we?

You have your own consciousness, but it is nothing, and this is the only rule that she expresses her consciousness, through us creatures that she has created. Are we banished by you, or do you want us to come to you and be with you forever, so how can we live forever?

Can there only be rules of nothingness in nothingness? Our bodies cannot exist in nothingness forever, and our consciousness cannot exist in nothingness forever? What can we do to become the rules of nothingness, in fact, we not only want to become the rules of nothingness, we also want to become the same as you, the rules of nothingness with power, we can tear apart the nothingness at any time, and give birth to the world we want, what should we do? Become one with you, we are originally integrated with you, we want to give birth to an independent us.

Originally, I also thought about using this relative speed and relative distance to set one-dimensional space, two-dimensional space and the like, to see what would happen, but I just thought that this is the same as nothingness, there is no existence, even if this rule is powerful, it can't produce anything, if you admit that space is also a kind of material existence, then you can still think like this, space itself is very nothing.

Nothingness itself cannot be said to be nothingness, there may be substances in the state of mutual rest and extrusion, so that the relatively large particles of matter can be torn apart by this rule, and the real emptiness in the void can be formed, these real emptiness is the concept of space, and those matter are considered a concept of time.

Matter that is at rest with each other is itself a kind of world of nothingness, a concept that can be said to exist or not exist, and there is no so-called time, so how did we discuss how these matter-of-life substances come about, is it necessary to do so?

How did they come about? If you had to give an answer, it would be at the end of the so-called time, and it would be at the beginning of the so-called time. Is the beginning and end of time just a human concept, is human beings a little arrogant in using their own concepts to set the reality of the world, and is the rule also just a human concept? Using the reality of the world to verify the concept is a scientific attitude, not the other way around.

In the world of mutual rest, because of the effect of rules, the flow dynamics also appear, and there is no static, and the so-called stillness is also a concept. The appearance of a random central convergence point, in this process, a lot of material deduction will occur, the emergence of space.

What's the use of these? Just like when anything was first born, we couldn't see what these were for, whether it could really be realized, this is what human beings wanted, they wanted to teleport matter instantly, they wanted cars to fly, they wanted to develop the universe, they wanted eternal life, and so on, the ancients also wanted this, and some of them became reality, although the cost is very high, the versatility is not strong enough, many people can't afford to use it, they can't use it, but after all, it still appears.

There are always many unquestionable existences, just like why space exists, why matter exists, why rules exist, these entangled, always feel that things suddenly appear together, and they can't find the source, that feeling is very helpless.

If this is such a sequential process, then why does matter exist? Can we infer why matter exists according to the properties of matter itself? What are the properties of matter itself? But the properties of matter appear because matter exists, so what kind of problems will arise when using the properties of matter to infer the existence of matter, and will there be mistakes? Is it possible to infer the rules of matter from the properties of matter? Does this lead to a problem that we have now, why does it exist? Why does this have these properties?

It's like asking why matter moves, what about matter at rest, what rules cause matter to move relatively, not absolutely stationary, and so on. If you ask these questions correctly, you will be able to find the answers, and if you ask them correctly, you will fall into myths and traps of human logic, which is inherently imperfect and full of traps.

All these rules are based on the existence of matter, because the existence of matter, space, time, motion, rules and other properties all exist, but why does matter exist? This question is right, but there is still no convincing answer.

Matter does not come from space, it is only with matter that there is space, so there is no answer to what spatial dimension is discussed. Although all the evolutionary properties of matter can be deduced with constant relative velocity and constant relative distance, it still cannot solve the question of why matter exists, because it should be the existence of matter that has the basis for the existence of this rule, otherwise it is a rule of nothingness.

Can the rules of nothingness give birth to matter from nothingness? This concept is very magical, just like what I described above, the rule of nothingness tears out the matter from nothingness, but the problem arises again, the matter in the nothingness itself is nothingness, is nothingness not nothingness, and there is real emptiness, so that matter and real emptiness are a pair of existences that can be annihilated by each other, but there is this rule of nothingness, and the impossibility of annihilation can only be born, then there must be a rule that can make annihilation happen, will this rule deduce a mechanism to make annihilation happen and return to nothingness?

Even so, but matter and true emptiness, such an expression, does it really say that there is nothing in nothingness? It is only in true emptiness that nothing exists, but the nothingness that is evenly filled by matter, what kind of concept is that, and it is also a kind of real emptiness in comparison, and if we talk about relative emptiness, if we express it in this way, the concept of the relative existence of matter can be used.

I'm afraid that in relative air, this rule of nothingness can also tear out relative matter, then it will be endless, this sounds like a trap, jump out first, and then talk about it, think about other possibilities, that is, why it exists, this question is really difficult for us, existence is really reality, at least we know that we exist, relatively exist.

Relative to the existence of time, after all, before we were born, we did not exist, after our death, we do not exist, we exist relative to time, what does this concept illustrate, illustrates the relative existence, the scale of relative existence, that is, the existence of matter is relative to the existence of time, this concept is very magical, the vacuum is a kind of time, the eternal existence time, matter is the time of relative vacuum existence, this rule of nothingness is probably a kind of rule that tears the nothingness of the relative existence of space-time, and the rule of annihilation is also realized through this rule of nothingness, is this the essence of the existence of the world？

So if there are other rules of nothingness that can have the power to tear apart the void and give birth to the world of time and space, then what will be those rules of nothingness? And what will the world from which these different rules of nothingness be born? It's amazing, we all want to know, please tell us, since we have the same level of realm as this rule of nothingness, we should be able to recognize more, on top of these rules of nothingness, in the nothingness, is there anything else?

If there really are higher rules of nothingness, can they really give birth to worlds of other dimensions?