How can we write about a bad person? According to the development of the actual situation, from one angle, from the perspective of a bad person, it is impossible to describe the bad of this person, as if they are describing a kind of cause and effect, and all the bad people are bad for a reason, and when we see this reason, all of a sudden the feeling that this person is a bad person is dissolved, and I just feel that he is doing things according to the logic of the development of things.

From the perspective of others, we can judge that he is selfish and harms the interests and lives of others, so he is condemned by others as a bad person. That is, it is a subjective standard for judging right and wrong. From someone else's point of view, from a certain person's point of view, this person's behavior is bad, and there is right and wrong.

It's very interesting that, by that standard, this contradiction is always there. Tolerance, understanding, etiquette, conventions, rules, all these are born to alleviate this contradiction. However, it is not possible to effectively solve this real and practical problem.

It seems that it is really unsolvable, maybe both sides have these cognitions and may understand it a little, but in the real reality, this contradiction will definitely happen. Is it really impossible for us to resolve these things that arise in reality in ourselves and succeed in our cognition?

We get angry, we resolve our anger, but can we really solve this contradiction between the two sides? Maybe it just shows our weakness to the other side, and can we really monitor our feelings all the time? I'm afraid no, that's what happens in reality. It's not something that can be solved by theory, it's human beings, and some are destined to be helpless.

In the magic civilization, Shi Yan has also read a lot of books on future world wars, those imaginary war fantasies, many of them are based on the logic of historical experience, rather than reasoning based on the logic of the current magic civilization, it may be easier to write according to history, and deduce the future on the basis of the present, this is the ability to predict, but not all people can do it, can see the current world clearly, watch history and understand people's behavior and thoughts, based on these two sides, and then assist some illusions that may develop in the magic civilization, it is possible to predict future wars。

In order to develop their own team, the memory cell organization keeps secreting something that drives us to find some memory materials, the existence of these memory materials that people can not forget, and once again opens up the team of memory cell tissue, they have grown themselves, and in the future they are still seeking to strengthen themselves, if there is no memory, and do not secrete the protein that wants to remember the material, then many people who take the initiative to see the world and experience the world want to feel lost, and there will be no action, no look or loss, or there is another better way to replace and neutralize this memory secretion, and the memory cell tissue structure will still grow and develop。

Just like the eyes, the cellular building systems that maintain the functioning of this tissue structure are trying to maintain their own existence, and the sensations in the person, and some of the secretions, the cell building systems are separated and cleared. People are often sensory mixed beings, distinguishing, it may be easier to recognize the human construct, so as to study the possibility of immortality, so that if a person wants to be immortal completely, then these cellular building systems must exist, otherwise the sense will be lost, for the person who has lost these feelings, it seems that it is still "me", as long as it is alive, there is only one sense exists, that is still "me".

Why is this unique "me" based on the construction of unique cells so unique, unlike some intelligent robots that show unity alone? I am afraid that this is given by the sense of memory, because the spatial existence is different, because the time experience is different, and the existence of these two makes "me" the only being anyway, that is to say, "me" is actually the feeling of memory, the feeling in memory, and this cell construct places the only "me" The other sensations are just the real-time nature of the performance, which enriches the feeling of "me" in the memory and allows "me" to have more experience.

Therefore, the "I" shows the coherence of time and the current space, it is such an being, the span of time is the experience of "me", and the instantaneous feeling of the current "me" is the current spatiality, and the two interfere with each other to form the feeling of the current "me".

Therefore, the current "me" is a very complex construction of existence, and there is not only one "me" in the span of time, but there are also many civilizational cognitions, and there are many other people's experiences, there are many civilizational cognition time threads, as well as the time threads of "me", which are concussions under the impact of the whole structure of the external space in an instant, resulting in the existence of a new "me".

From here, we thought of the way of existence of this world, maybe it is really the coherence of time and space, and then construct a new instantaneous existence, and it will continue, the black bullet ejection generates its own time line, collides with each other, and constantly deduces the existence of the next time and space, the movement rules of collision, the rules of operation alone, and the rules of relative velocity and relative distance.

It's just a more interesting construction of the universe space-time, and it still doesn't solve the problem of why sunspots exist, as if their existence comes from the future, and the circular interference of space-time is deduced, but even so. There is always a beginning, so we fall into a cognitive trap, why is there a beginning, there is no beginning, there is no end, and there is no existence, so what is our existence now?

If there are two cosmic worlds, positive and negative, how can positive and negative matter be generated and disappear? If the relative speed of this world remains the same, the relative distance remains the same, and the rest will be condensed, resulting in the existence and absence of space and the absence of two states, then the matter may be clear, this is the place where the sunspot is born, and it is also the place where the sunspot disappears, the sunspot is space, the trajectory of space deduces time, and the place where the sunspot disappears is the place where space fills.

When people are very tired, the brain does not process the external information, so it always seems that the person is unresponsive, and when he concentrates on processing a certain thing, he does not process some information from the outside world, and the other is to respond to all the information that happens.

"I" takes the self seen by the eyes as the appearance, if this is the appearance, it is the existence of "me", then clone another "me", will he think that this appearance is the real "me", this is a referential word, a vague referential word seen by the eye.

Is the death of the present "me" and the survival of the cloned "me" the immortality of the "me"? and then experience the new time to experience civilization and recognize your own unique feelings. But what do we think of as "me"? In terms of the appearance we see, in our own real experience, so the uniqueness of "me" is the uniqueness of "me" experience.

What's the use, this is war, it's very simple, think of how to fight, how to fight, this is the commander, there is no want, and it will not happen in the war, so if the people of the present want to be wars of the people of the future, if they want to be comprehensive, they must understand what the future will have, and if the people of the present want to know what the future war will be, then they must know who is the commander in the future war, what they can think of, how they want to fight, in fact, the former can also think about it, and the latter, is a complete unknown.

Thinking temporarily, this is not advisable for any commander, that will leave something behind, always ignore something, temporary thinking that is the ability to adapt on the spot, and it is also trained in peacetime. And in normal times, you have to think about everything every day, and think about everything comprehensively, which is a necessary homework for a commander.

This kind of experience of the commanders who survived the battlefield is also very vague for those commanders themselves, they don't know the reason for this at all, and they think that they are really talented or something, they vaguely believe in these talents, and they don't believe that these can be achieved through training, if you talk about talent, there really is, the same training method, some people are powerful, this difference can really be described by talent.

Shi Yan has no real experience on the battlefield of war, and his cognition is also seen from other books, and there are people he has come into contact with who tell him to listen, and he recognizes it, so he temporarily regards these cognitions as correct, whether it is really correct, and Shi Yan himself needs to practice and prove it. This kind of teacher performance is still normal, many people do not practice it themselves, they regard these as correct, yes, the person who wrote knowledge in the past is sacred, and the incorrect one never writes, and now the book has lost the flavor of that time, and it can only be confirmed by the practice of the person who reads it, and the book still needs to be read, because if you don't read it, there is no dabble in this area, let alone what practice has proven.

Speaking of writing books, we think that what we write is correct, when we write, we also think that what we write is correct, our cognition is still limited, when we write, we feel that what we write is correct, why is this? Because we think it's right, we express it, we don't take what we think is wrong as a correct statement, we feel that these are correct, so we express it, and if we look back later and recognize that it's wrong, it also means that when we write, there are limitations, and we feel the limitations of cognition. So we can't comment that we're expressing the wrong point of view, we can only say that we felt that our cognition was limited at that time, and in the same way, those who wrote books, if not intentionally, were when they wrote it, and at that time they felt that cognition was limited.

Deliberately, it's the kind of thing that I thought was false at the time, or I wrote it, like magic or something, and we think that magic is fake now, and people fight with powerful magic, and if magic is an analogy of science tools to assist in this kind, this can also be written.

In this book, a lot of God's feelings are what we feel and perceive at that time to be true, and it is true, so we think that these are existing, and we express them, if this is our real feeling expression, we feel that these are not writing stories, they are not false, all the time, we are expressing our feelings that our perception is correct at that time, and at that time our feelings think that these are correct, this is really not writing a story, fiction or something, and the story we write is also what we want to write like this, this is this kind of feeling expression, not to say, this story, this framework, this fiction, we don't want to write itAnd then it was written, actually, it was what we wanted to write like this, and it was written like this, and we always expressed it according to our own feelings, and we could only express it according to our own feelings, and there really was something we didn't want to write, and we had to write? No, no. At least we are like this, we want to write like this, we write like this, we can't stop ourselves, unless we revise it, it is also based on our feelings when we modify it, and after this deletion, it feels very weird, because we lose the expression of the real feeling at that time, but just describe what it feels like now, and what it feels like now, it should be expressed, and it should not be superimposed on the feeling at that time.