When I think I can integrate all the elements of knowledge into the novel, the reality always says that it is impossible, after all, knowing is understanding, after all, a novel is a novel, writing a novel is just a preference of my own, and knowing is my own thinking, when writing a novel, thinking about some things in the novel, these thinking and understanding are not the main thing for me.

What do you want? It is very clear that what you want to solve is how to break through the rules of death, compared to other cognitions, this is your main direction, in the process of breaking through, all cognitions are for this service, thinking about the real motivation?

If I say that I am seeking wisdom, many people will think that I am abnormal, that there is always a purpose for the pursuit of wisdom, that there is always a purpose for human activities, so what is the purpose? For the sake of eternal life or reproduction as a living being, this will inevitably become the ultimate goal of human beings compared to eternal life.

To achieve this goal, there must be a way, that is, to pursue wisdom, to gain knowledge, otherwise this will always exist in fantasy, it cannot become reality, if you do it, you will get closer, if it is just a fantasy, it will always be just a fantasy.

Too much energy is distracted on some seemingly useless understandings, whether this is the case, or must be like this, and the overall understanding is clear, so that we can simultaneously promote the breaking of the rules of death, think from various ways, and find ways to achieve it.

Human beings, the basis of dependence is emotion, it is impossible to really have no feeling at all, feeling is a kind of emotion, there is no feeling at all, that is, there is no longer the motivation to process external information, and it becomes a kind of receiving and storing machinery.

The feeling of oneself at a certain moment is the cognition of the information from the outside world that one receives, and this cognition is a feeling, and this feeling must be continuous and become a real cognition, and there must be a process of extracting memories, or a process of thinking, to derive what this is, and such a feeling appears.

And after this cognitive feeling appears, if you don't think, don't want to, then what is this, such a physical cognition, very simple cognitive feeling thinking, thinking is a cognitive feeling that continues to ask what this is, thinking is similar, but when we think, or think, we will not ask what the situation of the word appears, but will ask some cognition that has feelings, just like encountering a beast, will ask, what is this.

And why don't we ask questions about the words that appear to be expressed? What questions can we ask about these words? These words are what we have known, we have already recognized, and what questions can we ask in our memory? People who have already recognized and trusted all of them exist in their memory, and they will not feel anything about the appearance of such objects, they will only call them out, and when they see such things, they will emerge and perceive what they are, and they will not ask questions about what it is?

What you get will not be cherished, you will be numb when you see too much, this kind of thing may be related to this cognitive feeling of people, after asking a question to obtain a cognitive feeling, it will be trusted and stored, and it may become a call in the future, instead of asking a question, what is this?

What should people do to ask questions about any cognitive sensations, then they have to lose the memory area, or be alert, call the cognitive vigilance of the memory area, ask why, ask questions like this before using cognition, that is not exhausting people, the appearance of words, the appearance of this fine cognitive feeling, all the objects that have been recognized, question the authoritative cognition, distrust, completely distrust their own memory, civilized cognition.

The consequences will be more obvious, that is, more tired, in fact, there is no such tiredness, just distrust and doubt of social cognition, some of them have doubts, not all, perhaps, in fact, it feels better to doubt all social cognition, so that they can produce their own unique perspective.

This should be quite a magical and novel idea, it is impossible for you to do this in reality, maybe you can do it ideologically, you still have to apply these cognitions in reality, apply these cognitions, that is, you have trusted this cognition, since you have used it, it is trust, and because of trust, there will be no doubts, so that when you do things in reality, there will be the so-called neglect of details, ignoring details is because there is no feeling for these details, there is no doubt, and there will be no problem with trusting this, just like trusting someone to be able to do this well, in fact, after the problem occurs, it is someone who has not done a good job, so is doubt usefulIn fact, it doesn't have any effect, if you doubt everything, you will be tired to death, just like the doubt about all the cognitions of this society in your own mind now, then you have to be tired, you need to write so much, all to distinguish.

It's just that this kind of tiredness, I feel that it's okay, because I have come out with results, and the results I think are completely different from this social cognition, and I know very well that this is what I like, not that it's different, rebellion is what I like, but I feel that my cognition is right, that kind of joy.

In fact, I trust my own cognition, but is my cognition really correct? This needs to be verified, and we need to compare the cognition of the real society, the explanation of the phenomenon, and the existence of the phenomenon, so as to verify whether our cognition is correct.

This is a very effective way, and it has been summarized by me again, in fact, I can not summarize, not cognitive, or just cognitive, and do not write it, and it can't change anything when I write it, which seems to be a pessimistic idea, and the positive point is that it must be written, and it is possible to change something when I write it.

It's just that this is for my own feelings, not for reality, and this feeling is that I feel that the reality is very safe, and I am very free to write like this, or not to write, and nothing will happen, and if something happens in reality, I write it myself, and I have entered a dangerous state and been threatened by my life, and I don't think much about it, and if I think about it, what will happen?

Is that a normal smart person defined as such, selfish, and completely thinking about himself, this is a normal person, and then being smart, he will always put himself in a favorable, safe place. There are indeed a lot of people who can do this.

In such a comparison, I found that I am not a normal smart person at all, it is completely the opposite kind of abnormal and stupid person, maybe a person like myself is really not suitable for the current society, it is a person who is to be eliminated by society, and it will inevitably be eliminated, and it is written out just to let others understand that abnormal people, what type of stupid people are, what kind of thinking is, just a very strange phenomenon, why do I still have so much cognition, can write so much nonsense, in fact, if I can really get cognition like this, then I should be more abnormal, more stupid, I found myself in this state, is this considered narcissism？

In this case, writing a novel is just writing a novel, entertaining yourself, and thinking about some cognition at the same time, but here you still need to continue to write, write about those magical feelings, belong to your own cognitive feelings, pursue wisdom, and think about breaking the rules of death.