Once again, I feel that after my cognition exceeds a certain level, I can't lower my cognition, that is, I can't write it, and I can't write about the mistakes I recognize, and if I don't recognize the mistakes, there is no pressure to express it like this.

I don't know if this is the case with others, but I didn't write it absurdly, but there is nothing wrong with those absurd scenes, all the people who watch it will realize that this is illusory, not realistic, but for cognition, it's not like this, if I have cognitive bias and I don't feel it, the person who sees it may not be able to feel it even more, at least many people won't have such a feeling, it's terrible, this cognitive error, if it's described, how the person who looks at it, let them think about it, it's not realistic in many cases, because they may not think, they will only follow the cognition of the person who wrote。

Whether it is good to write like this, whether it is true or a false perception, this becomes terrible, and I hesitate, although I have emphasized a lot when I write, that is, I am afraid that others will follow my thinking, so that there will be some disasters, and many facts in history express this kind of disasters.

This is probably the biggest difficulty for people who write cognition, write a novel or something, look at the entertainment, the reader is happy, there will be nothing, if the reader falls into it, it is also a disaster for the reader, most people will not form a consensus, and the cognition is different, it will cause a group consensus to appear, and if this consensus is wrong, then a disaster will occur.

Or always emphasize, thinking, this is some thinking material, if it is regarded as a consensus, of course, personal cognition, you must confirm yourself, you must think by yourself, you can receive, you can also accept it suspiciously, and then to confirm, alas, I don't want to be designed by heaven and earth, to design the rules of this world, I can't be designed, and to prevent people who are affected by this book from being designed, in fact, the world is like this, I can tell it like this when I am sober, and others may not, and the people who see it here are cautious themselves.

A lot of facts, unavoidable and unavoidable, mistakes happen, it's an adventure, it's a kind of adventure for humanity, if you don't take risks, you will stagnate and stagnation, and stagnation will most likely lead to the demise of humanity, there is no way, take risks and move forward cautiously.

When I write it, there are still a lot of ideas that jump out of the framework of the story conception, and the way to solve this problem is to write here, and there is really no way to integrate it, and if you don't record it, it will disappear and you can no longer recall it, and many times this is the case.

Conceive the main line of the story, and then express it in another way of reflexing, this way is not bad, try to write and see if you feel good, the next time you think of another way to express, it becomes another way of describing, time seems to be really not enough, the world of home and the world of a single person are indeed really completely different, maybe let go of some, leave some room for joy for future generations, find an excuse for yourself, think or continue, as for the real time, there is no way, after all, I am a mortal, and I also live in the world, and experience everything in this world。

Is it really like everyone else? People like you know will eventually go into this world, why? You know very clearly, you want it in your heart, and now you have it, it's all calm, and you don't know what will happen in the future? And whether you are more mature after experiencing this, you will confirm these to yourself in the future, look at your future calmly, and now you are thinking very calmly, it has really reached that level, and when you are facing it, you must have some fluctuations, record it here, and you can know it by comparison in the future.

Why lower my own cognition to narrate those personal descriptions, I shouldn't do this, in order to show artistry, or conform to the specific cognition of the set character, and this narrative, I'm not telling a story, I'm looking for thinking, I'm really going astray, maybe use the character of that setting, but the thought is still more cognition, so although it doesn't conform to the thinking of the character in reality, but I really don't need to think about it so much, because this is a novel, even if it destroys the authenticity, so what, just try to describe, to think, and my purpose itself doesn't care about the novel。

Can people rebel against that kind of rule? It's like sleep, it's like life and death, it's like human nature, it's like some so-called physical and chemical rules, I'm afraid it's difficult, it's a kind of world operating rules, and in order to get rid of these, we must first find an optimal alternative.

Sometimes, at the beginning of the stage, the idea of emotion is very good, and the thinking is also very good, but when you do it, you do it badly, and the emotions you gain at this time are bad, in the face of these, you must naturally prepare your heart first, but it is inevitable to lose after all, maybe at this time, the original good emotions are hurt, and you retreat, and you don't want to touch such a thing again, this kind of experience must exist in reality, and it erodes and corrupts yourself little by little, can it be avoided?

It's that I went off the rails, fell into a trap that I didn't notice, and then I didn't realize it, there have been many times like this, and the direction of the deviation is different every time, but every time I fall into it, I can't detect it, and I can detect it later, because my thinking is not fixed.

In the past, I really didn't expect time to become so short, and I always felt like I had so much time to go home every day, and I had to find something to do and plan for that time, and the contrast was obvious, and the weekend time was basically completely lost.

The reality I am facing, I also let myself think about this kind of thing, in the end, which is the point, and then I also understood that if I am regarded as a normal point, I should not focus on writing this, it should be like this in the eyes of others, and I am also confused?

Clearly know that if you don't shift your focus, some inevitable things will happen in reality, and you will still be held hostage by reality? Do you really want to get away from reality? Do you really want to spend time in the world of ideology? This is also okay, then you have to give up reality completely, and reality does not give up on yourself, so what should you do?

Is the place of my emotional nostalgia still reality? Is it in the ideographic world that I am avoiding reality? It is to give up reality, in the past, I kept moving closer to the ideographic world, and I do have such a tendency, if I completely enter the ideographic world, that is to say, the superficial world does not have what I care about, maybe the existence of my family, so that the lonely self is not completely caught in the ideographic world.

If I understand it this way, the so-called complete ideographic world is really a world completely different from reality, a self-constructed, emotionally dependent place, and all the material constructions in it do have the shadow of the appearance world, but emotions do not exist in the appearance world, these emotions are buried by themselves and will not be reflected in reality.

However, I found that the emotions constructed by the ideographic world in turn occupied the emotions of my body, but the ideographic world occupied my own subject, and I seemed to be a mechanical existence in the epigraphic world more often, and my emotions and thoughts had been submerged in the ideographic world.

But this time, I let my emotions be embodied in the world of appearances, this is my own home, for my own home, the home I have formed, do emotions overflow in the world of appearances?