Shang Luoyu immediately summarized after saying the conditions: "To sum up, we believe that the crime of bigamy stipulated in China's law is obviously not formulated for Chen as a special subject, and there is no clear provision on whether Chen's behavior of getting married after sex reassignment surgery constitutes the crime of bigamy, which is a legal gap, so according to the principle of criminal law, Chen's behavior cannot constitute a crime."

200 years ago, the father of modern criminal law, Feuerbach, expressed in the form of aphorisms in the form of popular legal terms, has never deviated from the basic content of not being able to be innocent, nor has it ever given up the essential spirit of preventing private law from arbitrarily and ensuring basic human rights. ”

No matter who it is, everyone is quiet now, the positive side Nie Yifeng stated his views with three reasons and a famous quote, and the opposing side Shang Luoyu also countered with three reasons and celebrity aphorisms, closely following the positive side's speech is reasonable and powerful.

This is not something that ordinary people can do, it can be seen from the speech that the opposing side has a small victory, and everyone is looking at Wen Zhixia, expecting her to win back a city in the free debate session.

Wen Zhixia also lived up to expectations, and as soon as he came on the field, he was full of firepower: "We need to remind the opposing defense friend how Chen left when he left, and the other party's defense friend secretly changed the concept here to equate sex reassignment surgery with the death of the identity of the spouse."

The Marriage Law stipulates that there must be three forms of dissolution of marriage: one is natural death, the second is divorce, and the third is declared death. If one of the spouses is declared missing, the marriage can only be terminated by a judgment of divorce. May I ask the opponent what does this conform to?"

It can be said that although Wen Zhixia said a word of local language when she spoke, and did not use French to describe Chen's absence, she stubbornly held what Nie Yifeng said and continued to ask questions, once again clarifying their views, and on the whole, it was still flawed.

Huang Yixi didn't catch the inappropriateness of her words, this kind of trick is okay to quarrel at the end of Tiantou Village, but it is difficult to get into the hall of elegance, and it will only make herself inferior, but she is not ambiguous, "...... After Chen's sex reassignment surgery, he has changed from a man to a woman, are they spouses before the sex change, and are they still spouses after the sex change? If they are spouses, when will our country recognize same-sex marriage?

I have to say that Huang Yixi closely follows the actual operation process, some legal clauses are not detailed clauses that are not operable in practice, and they are facts.

Seeing that most of the audience nodded in agreement, Shen Chang was anxious when he heard it: "Our country does not recognize same-sex marriage, but I can't leave gently, and it will be over without taking a cloud with me, you must know that Chen's inaction has many sequelae, who will raise his children, and who will be filial to his parents, how can it be said that the spousal relationship is dead without the law as stipulated by law?"

As soon as he said this, Nie Yifeng and Tang Zhan sighed in their hearts, and immediately lamented, it's over, Shen Chang was led away by the nose, and the questions he asked were already another question of legal relationship, from A to B does not mean that A can be pushed to B.

Huang Yixi's debating style is like this, and she was taken to the ditch by her if she didn't pay attention.

summarized the people she had with after the fact, and argued with Huang Yixi, she would rather answer the bull's head than follow her words, otherwise she will definitely go all the way to the end and never turn back.

Now they can only hope that Kang Mingyang also made a mistake, otherwise, the nine cows would not be able to pull it back.

But is Kang Mingyang the one who gives the opportunity? Unlikely, although his debating style is not as sharp as Huang Yixi's, and his sword is off the peak, but after so many debate matches, he has not many places to excel, but there are also very few who are out of line.

Is Kang Mingyang the one who gave this opportunity? Obviously not, if he hadn't seized this opportunity, Shang Luoyu and Huang Yixi would definitely give him a mixed doubles for husband and wife.

With the couple's eyes of "If you kid can't seize the opportunity, you will die", Kang Mingyang replied with an expression of "I am confident, you should be calm for a while":

"Don't forget, the positive side is discussing whether Chen is guilty of bigamy, which belongs to the criminal law, and the third argument of the positive side is now asking how to divide his property and who will raise the child, which is obviously a civil relationship, and the scope of our discussion is not related, the positive side of the debate friend is thousands of miles away, because the debate time is so precious, I will not answer, if the other side of the debate friend is interested, we can continue to discuss the civil part after the game. ”

Wen Zhixia secretly scolded the waste in his heart, and immediately stood up to remedy: "We believe that civil relations are the premise of criminal relations, and if they do not dissolve their marriage through legal relations, then how can their property be divided, and who will raise their children? If Chen does not constitute the crime of bigamy, then the other party's defense friend, Chen's wife, after Chen X is sexually changed, is this marriage relationship valid or invalid for her? If it is invalid, is it okay for the other party's defense friend to confirm it?"

As soon as Wen Zhixia's words came out, people immediately applauded, her remedy was too timely and effective, and the effect came out immediately.

That's right, Chen is not dead, he is still alive, and the marriage relationship between him and his wife still exists for his wife, who dares to declare it invalid without any basis and without any formalities?

Huang Yixi was not fooled, and immediately stood up: "The reason why the positive side recognized bigamy is that it is determined that the marriage relationship registered by Chen as a woman exists and is valid, but there is only one subject, Chen cannot exist as a man and a woman at the same time, and my country's marriage law also does not recognize same-sex marriage, on the one hand, it does not agree with same-sex marriage, and on the other hand, it recognizes the existence of same-sex marriage relationship, and requires same-sex people to dissolve illegal marriage relations in a legal way, isn't this a logical mistake?"

As soon as Huang Yixi's words fell, the audience in the audience was quiet again, yes, China's constitution stipulates the principle of monogamy, and only the rights and obligations stipulated by the constitution and the law are obliged to be obeyed by the actors, and China's marriage law only stipulates how to divorce a man and a woman, and how to divorce two women, is there a corresponding legal provision? Is there a corresponding department to manage it?