Lu Qingfeng's barabala, who was like a cannonball, told the basis and reasons for his defense, Shang Luoyu and Huang Yixi Kang Mingyang looked at each other after listening to Lu Qingfeng's point of view, and they were secretly convinced.

No wonder he is the first foreign spokesman of the municipal government, and the rebuttal is perfect in all aspects.

Although they sit on opposite sides, they can't help but appreciate each other.

Lu Qingfeng is less than forty this year, he is very tall, he should be about 1.75 meters, there is a small black mole at the corner of his mouth, the corners of his mouth are resolute, and he has no expression when he doesn't speak.

She is the spokesperson of the state government of the state of Whitewater, which is similar to the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the region. In the eyes of ordinary people, she is a powerful female cadre, but according to Li Min, although she looks powerful on the outside, she is actually very soft on the inside, and in the short time together, she feels that she is very good at taking care of people.

Li Min once summarized the characteristics of several powerful female lawyers she knew, Lu Qingfeng, Zhang Mei and Xue Lubo are both powerful women, but Xue Lubo's strength lies in interests, vulgarity, Zhang Mei's strength lies in calculation, ruthlessness, Lu Qingfeng's strength lies in ability, which is admirable.

Although Huang Yixi didn't know her, after listening to her defense, he had something to say, and refuted it according to the facts and reasons of the complaint, and each of them was justified and well-founded.

After this round of pleadings, not to mention Sunset and other judges, even Kang Mingyang was almost persuaded by Lu Qingfeng, obviously feeling that he was reasonable, but he felt that Lu Qingfeng's reasoning was really correct.

Is this prosecution going to fail?

Lawyer Yu Wangyang saw Kang Mingyang's eyes flickering and silent when he saw Kang Mingyang, who had been in the society all the year round, of course he could see that his opponent was a little shaken, and gradually relaxed.

Lu Qingfeng was a little nervous, she always paid attention to Huang Yixi's expression.

In her feeling, her combination of punches did not make Huang Yixi mess up, but made her feel relieved.

According to the investigation, Lu Qingfeng also knows very well that Huang Yixi is not an experienced old lawyer, and the same is true for Shang Luoyu.

The lawyer profession is very practical, and it is not possible to become a lawyer by going back to the law.

Sunset looks at both sides playfully, but his mind is actually very complicated.

On the one hand, he believes that the honor of the government needs to be maintained.

On the other hand, he admires lawyers who have the courage to challenge authority for the sake of the law and his own persistence.

Frankly speaking, as a judge with pursuits and ideals, he believes that for a period of time, the judicial environment in China is regressive, and there are too few lawyers with backbone, spirit and spirit, and many people have been lawyers for several years and forget why they are lawyers.

And Huang Yixi brought him a hint of surprise.

Sunset's eyes lit up with excitement, and this round was a draw.

Both parties submitted all the facts and reasons in the Complaint and Reply in support of their evidence.

After pre-trial cross-examination, the two defendants had no objection to the three nature of the evidence submitted by the plaintiff.

The documents provided by the defendant were all documents of the government of Baishui Prefecture, and Huang Yixi stood up and began to cross-examine them one by one.

"We have objections to the authenticity and relevance of Exhibit 1 and the Contact Form for the Preliminary Work of the Development of the Fixed Asset Investment Project of Donghai Community, as far as we know, the preliminary work contact sheet was originally a blank copy and was supplemented later. ”

Baishui Prefecture is very small, and the workers in the Donghai community have relatives in Partridge Village, so it is impossible for them to come forward to testify, but the information they provide is enough for Huang Yixi and others to know the real situation.

As soon as she heard that she was going to apply for handwriting identification, Lu Qingfeng's eyes blinked involuntarily, and when the Donghai community provided this contact form, she also specially asked about the authenticity of the contact form, and the other party also made a verbal guarantee.

Regarding the second evidence provided by the defendant, that is, on January 12, 2018, Huang Yixi had no objection to the authenticity of the Reply of the Baishui Municipal Urban and Rural Planning Bureau on Approving the Land Use Scope of the Dilapidated Housing Renovation and Renovation Project of Plots B1-B7 in the Donghai Central Area (Bai Shui Gui Han [2018] No. 44), but had objections to its legality and relevance.

First, the document is not accompanied by a city planning map, and the evidence is incomplete.

Second, the Municipal Urban and Rural Planning Bureau is a subordinate department of the municipal government, one of the defendants in this case, and the letter issued by it cannot be used to prove the legality of the municipal government's expropriation.

On January 25, 2018, the Baishui Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources had no objection to the authenticity of evidence 3 in the "Reply Opinions on Confirming that the Land for the Dilapidated Housing Renovation and Reconstruction Project on Plots B1-B7 in the Central Area of the East China Sea Conforms to the Overall Land Use Plan" (Baishui Land Zihan [2018] No. 50), and had objections to its legality and relevance.

Second, the overall land use plan of Baishui City approved by the State Council or the Minyue Provincial Government shall be provided for review to prove that the above-mentioned land plots are in line with the overall land use plan.

As for Evidence 4, on April 18, 2018, the General Office of the Baishui Prefecture Municipal People's Government issued the Notice on Issuing the 2018 Urban Dilapidated Housing Renovation Housing Relocation Task (Baishui Fu Ting Zi [2018] No. 133), which stated that the Donghai Community Management Committee could not obtain the authority to expropriate houses based on an internal government notice. This evidence cannot be used to prove the legality of the defendant's expropriation and has nothing to do with this case.

On June 12, 2018, the Fengjiang District Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau had no objection to the authenticity of Evidence 5 in the Notice of Housing Expropriation, the Announcement of the Housing Expropriation Compensation Plan (Draft for Comments) and the Housing Expropriation Compensation Plan (Draft for Comments), but had objections to its legality and relevance.

First, the expropriation notice is not a housing expropriation procedure stipulated in the Regulations on the Expropriation and Compensation of Houses on State-owned Land, and cannot be used to prove the legality of the expropriation procedure, and the parties cannot remedy their rights against this expropriation notice;

Second, the time of the advance notice of expropriation is before the decision of expropriation is made, and there is no legal basis for the advance notice of expropriation;

Third, the main body of the expropriation notice is the Donghai Community Housing and Urban Construction Bureau, which has no right to issue the expropriation notice, and the compensation plan and announcement date (2018.6.12) are before the housing expropriation announcement (2018.7.18), that is, the compensation plan has been publicized without the expropriation announcement, and the procedure is illegal.

Evidence 6 to 13 are all relevant documents of the selected housing expropriation appraisal agency, and have nothing to do with the legality of the housing expropriation decision at issue in this case, and will not be cross-examined

Regarding Exhibit 14, on July 13, 2018, the Fengjiang District Expropriation Office issued the "Reply to the Opinions of the Expropriated Households on the Expropriation and Compensation Plan for the Urban Dilapidated Housing Renovation Project on Plots B1-B7"

Article 7 of the reply clearly states that there is collective land within the scope of the expropriation, but the two defendants expropriated the collective land in accordance with the Regulations on the Expropriation and Compensation of Houses on State-owned Land, which is obviously illegal.