Zhou Fangyuan was furious, of course, he could only play a role in the group.

However, Yuanfang Group is now a well-known enterprise group in China, with dozens of large and medium-sized enterprises under its jurisdiction, and the power that can be generated by such a behemoth is huge.

First of all, on Weibo, all the videos and information about Lin Yueya, all the retweets and @, all disappeared overnight. There is a very powerful calculation formula in the background of Weibo, which can accurately capture all relevant information, and Zhou Fangyuan rarely asks Weibo officials to take the initiative to do anything, unless it rises to the national level, or has a bad impact on the society, it will negotiate with relevant departments and cooperate with relevant departments to control the direction of public opinion. But this time, he was really angry, both angry at the arrogance of those keyboard warriors and angry at his own hindsight.

So for the first time, he demanded that Weibo forcibly delete all relevant discussions and posts without giving any explanation.

Secondly, Weibo, Alipay, Yuanfang Mobile Phone, Yuanfang Network Manager, Yuanfang Games and other companies privately joined forces to investigate the relevant information of all the people involved in the matter. Of course, illegal things must not be done, such as quietly looking for someone to follow, or human flesh and someone's information, etc., these can't be done, but the above-mentioned people, as long as they have used any product of the Yuanfang Group, he will more or less leave his own information, according to this information, all the information about this person collected from the subordinate companies within the group is gathered, and finally put it on Zhou Fangyuan's desk.

Especially that Deng Jie, through investigation, his father is engaged in the catering industry, in his hometown, there are three or four medium-sized restaurants, as well as several chain express hotels.

Express hotel, to be honest, Zhou Fangyuan has no good way, let's not talk about it. But those restaurants, according to the information from Yuanfang Food, it is determined that these restaurants and Yuanfang Group have a cooperative relationship. Of course, it is only a very rudimentary kind of procurement relationship, that is, to purchase some semi-finished products from Yuanfang Food, and to purchase fresh seasonal vegetables from the farms under the local Yuanfang Group. Because it is a group mass production, the price is relatively cheap, and the quality and price can be guaranteed while ensuring profits, and it is loved by all walks of life.

Of course, the hotel is no exception, seasonal vegetables are very important, semi-finished products are also very important, if you measure the cost, in fact, direct bulk procurement and their own production of the hotel is almost the same, and there is such a procurement relationship.

"It's out of stock. ”

Zhou Fangyuan gave the order.

According to the contract, Yuanfang Group will definitely compensate the other party for part of the funds, but it doesn't matter, the compensation will be compensated, anyway, the Yuanfang Group will definitely not provide any more products. Not only that, but they also reduced material costs for other partners in the same region. Of course, the requirement is that they also reduce the price of related dishes, in fact, it is to support and encourage other hotels, close together, and wage a price war against Deng Jie's hotel. There are only a few medium-sized hotels, where can they withstand such a dimensionality reduction blow. The distant group has a big business, and if you lose money to play with you, can you afford to play?

Not much, the average price drop of 20 yuan per dish, and the price of all mainstream dishes are reduced by 20, how much money can you have in a month? I'm afraid it's not enough to earn more than a day of distant games.

Just imagine, almost all the medium-level hotels in the city have reduced their prices, Deng Jie and his family will not drop? When the time comes, the local hotels that have united will publicize it to the outside world and make some rumors. It didn't take long for the storage to make several of Deng Jie's hotels stinky on the street. Of course, if the other party grits his teeth and insists on insisting, that's fine, anyway, Zhou Fangyuan's purpose is to punish, even if he spends money, just be happy. And this is only the first wave of blows, is Weibo eating?

Since they can find a big V water army to oppress Lin Yueya, then Zhou Fangyuan can use the same means to give them eye medicine and send some content that catches the wind and shadows, which is specious.

Of course, Zhou Fangyuan will not get started in person, and no one will know that he is behind the ghost, and no one will even know the role of the Weibo official in this.

Aren't you very fond of cyberviolence? Okay, so I'll give you a taste of what cyberviolence is.

On the school side, there will also be people who will contact the school leaders.

Similar to Lin Yueya's behavior of moral kidnapping of classmates in their class, the school doesn't care, Deng Jie deceived his classmates, and used videos and pictures to threaten female classmates, what does the school say? If you don't say it, then see you on Weibo. If you don't want to be exposed, you have to have an explanation!

To be honest, online violence is terrifying, once a trend is formed, it is not difficult for online violence to make a big living person socially die in minutes.

And the moral kidnapping, which often appears with online violence, is disgusting.

The phrase "I am for your good" is often heard in daily life, accompanied by the major choices in our lives, and is a sentence that everyone around us likes to say, but there is a kind of "good for you" is to put expectations on you in the name of love in the cloak of kindness, which is actually a kind of moral kidnapping; Although the starting point may be a kind reminder, even if we don't have rich experience and wisdom now, and we will take some wrong paths, we always have to go through the experience, even if we will regret it in the end, we also have the experience and the courage to try next time.

Everyone has the right to choose, you can express your position, it's my business to listen or not, I also have the right to choose to try and decide what I want in life. After all, you are not me, you can't help me make a choice, and there is not so much empathy in this world. At the same time, while you give me advice, you also have to think about what I like, I will refer to your opinion, but you can't dictate my decisions.

"This dress looks better, I'm good for you" Parents will choose what they like when they take you to buy clothes, and doubt your vision, even though you repeatedly emphasize that you don't like it, they will still buy what they have chosen. You give up your favorite major, they say "I'm for your good" and let you choose a good job major, but you don't refute; just out of social work, you give up the idea of going on your own, they say "I'm for your good" and let you choose a stable job to stay in your hometown; when you reach the age of marriage, they say "I'm for your good" and arrange a blind date for you, and you can make do with it.

As a result, your life is arranged, just like an actor living in a script, and in the end, looking back on your life, leaving nothing, living in the will of others, never fighting for anything, bravely following the choice of the heart, is this kind of life really meaningful? Of course, the initial starting point of parents must indeed be for the good of their children. In the eyes of parents, they have at least ten or twenty years more life experience than their children, and they hope to use their past experience to help their children avoid detours. The consequences may be good or bad, but we can't hold a grudge against our parents for that.

It can only be said that this type of moral kidnapping is sometimes really helpless and makes people laugh and cry.

But there is another type of moral kidnapping, that is, the real moral kidnapping, which is the real shrimp pig heart.

For example, a top international exhibition of personal belongings held in Shanghai welcomed more than 4,000 wealthy people at that time. These tycoons are quite generous. The generosity of the wealthy at the top luxury shows stands in stark contrast to their usual stinginess towards philanthropy. As a result, the public has accused the rich of plutocrats preferring to squander rather than donate and take more responsibility for society.

But in fact, the rich also have a saying, first of all, do charity, the current regulatory system itself is not perfect. In addition to their own consciousness, the most fearful thing for the rich is that charitable donations are not managed well and transparently, and even misappropriated and embezzled. In reality, this kind of thing happens from time to time. China's charity trust mechanism is not perfect, the rich do not lack love but lack trust in the donation supervision system, they do not believe that some charities can manage their donations well.

In fact, the intervention of the media is an infringement of the personality rights of the person being helped.

In the early days of mass journalism, there was a trend of voyeurism in newspapers, and even on the wedding night of President Cleveland in 1886, a large number of reporters stayed outside the president's room to listen to the newlyweds' privacy. Four years later, Warren, a lawyer in the United States, was untruthfully portrayed by the newspapers because of his private party, and lawyer Brandeis published an article entitled "The Right to Privacy", which became the original source of contemporary privacy law, and they proposed that everyone should have the right to live a peaceful life without being disturbed by the media. The "moral kidnapping" of the media has made the decisions of the victims of help largely influenced by public image considerations, disturbing their right to live a peaceful life and make free choices.

Of course, public figures should exercise a certain duty of tolerance, but does tolerance mean completely giving up their right to privacy?!

Finally, and most importantly, "moral kidnapping" is actually a violation of the right of the person being asked to dispose of property freely.

From the perspective of property rights, the celebrity rich obviously have the right to dispose of their property freely, as long as their income is legal, then they have the right to dispose of it freely. Even if they are enthusiastic about public welfare, different people will have different choices, whether it is poverty alleviation, or donation to out-of-school children, or donation to environmental protection causes, etc., if they have scruples and are forced to donate to some things that have not been considered, this is obviously an infringement of the right to free disposal of property.

Donations, as a personal right to dispose of property, are themselves selective. The practice of "moral kidnapping" almost leaves the victim with no choice, and if he does not make a profit, it will bring about the loss of his personal public image. If the media crosses the line and becomes a "watcher", "snooper" or "judge" in the private sphere, it will inevitably lead to the dislocation of the media's own role. Whether it is in good intentions or simply in pursuit of higher circulation, ratings or clicks, the media should be cautious about "moral kidnapping" and do not harm the personal rights of the person seeking help.

The same is true of Lin Yueya's energy.

As an adult citizen with civil capacity, she has the right to decide her own life, she has the right to make her own choices, and as long as the choices she makes are legal, then no one has the right to interfere.

Deng Jie wants to pursue her?

But she has the right to refuse.

But what did those people in her class do? Holding high the banner of morality, it was as if as long as Lin Yueya disagreed with Deng Jie, it was intolerable and should be criticized.

What a thing!

The essence of moral kidnapping is to use morality as a weight to coerce individuals or people into having to do certain things, and the result is generally that they have little pride in doing it, and if they don't do it, they will feel uneasy for a period of time. This kind of thing happens a lot in our society. For example, semi-coercive donations, apologies that should not have been made, and so on. Moral kidnapping is easy to succeed because in societies that emphasize groups and unified values, public opinion has the function of killing people. As a result, there have been involuntary donations and apologies full of grievances.

For example, Zhou Fangyuan saw a news article before, saying that because the girl was suffering from uremia, she had spent more than 100,000 yuan on treatment alone, which had brought down the family, but if the follow-up treatment was to be in place at one time, at least 20 to 300,000 yuan would be needed, and the family could not bear it. So someone posted the news on the Internet, and then someone suggested that it would be better to go to those who won the lottery to donate a little. Coincidentally, someone from this sick girl's fellow villager won the jackpot. So many people spontaneously went to the lottery station, holding hands and lining up for a long time, calling on the winners to donate money.

What are you doing!

Isn't this moral kidnapping?

Although the person who won the lottery, yes, the prize money is equivalent to a strong wind, pure luck. But the money is reasonable and legal, and it is also recognized by the country that has paid taxes, so why should it be donated?

In humanitarianism, helping, many people are willing to do it, but if you force me to do it, it will not taste right. Helping is a favor, not helping is a duty, how can there be such a "threat" that others must help? This is not called donation, this is called robbery!

Zhou Fangyuan didn't look down on this phenomenon the most, and he didn't usually see it when it didn't happen to him, so he pretended not to see it.

But now that it's happening directly to him, he can't bear it.

As a result, in the face of the anger of the distant group, the first to react was the school. Of course, the school is not afraid of Zhou Fangyuan, nor is it afraid of the Yuanfang Group, but the school is face-saving. In addition to Deng Jie, a scumbag like him, he actually used all kinds of dirty means to let a whole class of people threaten a girl and other objects, and if he didn't agree, he directly posted it to engage in online violence at night. If this is to be publicized by Weibo officials, where will the school's face go?

With this in mind, the school was angry in the first place.

For the first time, Deng Jie was given a major demerit, of course, this was only a preliminary punishment. Those who participated in it, and those who shouted the most, were all given warnings. Those who didn't make much noise were all punished or severely educated by the class instructor and the department, and only a very few people escaped this disaster.

Zhou Fangyuan was dissatisfied with the treatment of them, and only Deng Jie had a major demerit that Zhou Fangyuan was dissatisfied with, and he was still putting pressure on the school to expel Deng Jie directly. On the other hand, the siege of Deng Jie's hotel has also been in full swing.