980. Punishment
Lin Yueya can not take these things seriously, but Zhou Fangyuan can't.
He never expected that under his nose and in his own Weibo, his woman would be subjected to online violence!
As a reborn, Zhou Fangyuan couldn't be more familiar with the Internet, especially the various online violence on Weibo. Reborn I, why has he been letting QQ go untreated and letting Xiao Ma Ge develop, but instead he has to catch Weibo in his own hands? Because in the next ten years, it will be the main battlefield of countless people's Internet tearing.
It's just that what he didn't expect was that this time it was actually the people around him who suffered.
On the one hand, Ge Xiaohong (bodyguard) did not provide him with relevant information in time, and on the other hand, it was Zhou Fangyuan's own carelessness. , It stands to reason that he usually looks at Weibo, just open it at will, and he himself will not play control comments casually. However, in the recent days, the front is the World Cup, and he has participated in two programs in a row, plus some work of the group, he hasn't been on Weibo for about half a month, and it turned out to be like this.
To be honest, seeing Lin Yueya being "cared for" in the video, Zhou Fangyuan was really about to vomit.
As for the subsequent fermentation of the video on the Internet, although netizens are generally divided into two factions to pinch each other, there are still many people in the group who scold. People follow the trend in various ways, as if Lin Yueya does not accept Deng Jie's pursuit and does not accept the help of her classmates, she is a heinous villain.
What is this, this is called cyber violence!
This is the case in the Internet era, hot events emerge one after another, causing all kinds of controversies, and online media has become a gathering place for public opinion.
On today's online platforms, there are many trolls and some people with wrong views, who are too angry, and some people blatantly carry out personal attacks, some people use them as tools to tear apart and attract attention, some people are led by the nose and lose their judgment, and in addition to obtaining necessary information, they live like a place to splash dirty water.
And what is really scary is that for some malicious views, a large number of people will like and echo them, forming a powerful force of public opinion. As soon as an incident happens, netizens are anxiously waiting to see the reaction of the friends around the protagonist, and if there is no response, they will be bombarded in turn; This kind of logic is really "scolding people when they don't get along", which becomes a kind of moral kidnapping.
Standing on the commanding heights of morality, judging with one's own point of view, trying to persuade people who are not in harmony with you, often using swear words and insulting words, this kind of behavior is very naïve, like a quarrel with a kindergarten child.
In the era of information explosion, whenever a new news comes out, all the media are the first to report it, and there is a long follow-up development report, most of which are repetitive and redundant;
In fact, the best attitude towards online violence, whether it was people or viewers at the time, was silence.
For sensitive or sad topics, it is not suitable to be hyped up, and it will increase the pain of the person concerned and the family and friends around him. This is an era where everyone can speak out, and it is also an era when everyone will be criticized by the pen, in some specific situations, it is difficult to comment rationally and unbiasedly about right and wrong, do not blindly stand in line, make judgments, and easily deny a type of person; the best response is to be silent, not to evaluate or speak, because no matter what you say, it seems that you are flaunting yourself.
Even if you try to narrate it in calm words, you can't escape this suspicion. Online violence does cause great harm and impact on the physical and mental health of many people, but there is no need to ignore it; just like if you are bitten by a dog on the street, will you bite back, of course not.
For inferior species, if you have fought back in the same way, you will lower your identity and demeanor, and you will also cause perversion and psychosis, what is the difference between you and a dog?
There are two kinds of shame on the Internet, one is called "people are cloudy", and the other is called "bad words" to hurt people. The Internet has given everyone the right to speak up freely, but at the same time, it has also bred countless keyboard warriors who are "good" at attacking and insulting others on the Internet. Good words are warm in three winters, and bad words are hurtful and cold in June.
I don't know how many people still remember a girl named Fei Tutuo_ Mu Xiuxiu, anyway, Zhou Fangyuan remembers. In her previous life, the girl posted a suicide note on Weibo. The reason for writing this last word is that her father's company had problems and he borrowed a lot of loan sharks in the name of himself and his family. The result can be imagined, in the end, everyone betrayed their relatives and left, overwhelmed, and the family of three chose to commit suicide. Fortunately, this suicide was saved in time, and he is ready to return to the capital to live a good life.
The girl also posted a message, in which she said: "I'm sorry for worrying you...... I love the world because there are still you in the world. At this point, it should have been a happy ending, and netizens worked together to save the lives of three people.
Ten days later, however, the family committed suicide again, this time without sending any distress signals to the outside world, and when they found out, only her mother survived.
Looking at the girl's dynamics again, all kinds of abusive comments can be seen everywhere below, and they are all super high comments. When they were saved from suicide for the first time, the keyboard warriors began their actions, questioning, insulting, insulting, attacking, smashing their heads and faces, and even all the private information of the parties was posted on the Internet.
Finally, the young girl and her father were gone forever. Will the group of people who are cyber violent feel guilty? Definitely not, they will not feel that this result is caused by them, and they will wait again for the next person who is worthy of their "shot".
There are many more things like this: Australian 14-year-old child star Amy, Nanxian actress Shirley......
Life is really fragile, and no matter how strong a person is, he can't withstand the verbal violence of the Internet.
Verbal violence refers to insulting and discriminatory language such as abuse, slander, contempt, and ridicule to attack others, resulting in mental and psychological violations and damage to others. On the surface, verbal violence may seem more "gentle" than direct harm, but in fact, the harm caused by verbal violence to others is more profound and long-lasting.
Verbal violence is often inseparable from the group of "keyboard warriors". In fact, Keyboard Warrior does not only exist on the network platform in our country, but also exists on major platforms at home and abroad. They like to raise the bar with others, and they like to insult and ridicule others, intentionally or unintentionally...... And make it your own pleasure. So what is it that produces so many keyboard warriors who are "good at verbal violence"? I think there are two parts: the subjective part and the objective part.
The subjective part is simple, because this group wants to gain recognition on the Internet that is difficult to obtain in reality.
The main characteristic of this type of group is that they are timid and afraid of things in life, and they run away when they encounter problems. But on the Internet, it is "courageous and courageous" and "has a strong sense of justice". I have encountered enough things in life that can distort his moral psychology, and he likes to be competitive and irrationally express extreme views.
Reading comprehension skills, logical thinking skills, and writing skills are relatively poor, and they like to quarrel, and their remarks are vulgar and unbearable. In real life, they are rarely recognized by mainstream values, but the online world provides them with a place to act as "opinion leaders".
Lacks rationality, but is extremely fond of exerting his argumentative nature.
If there is a dispute about a certain issue in a normal person, there will definitely be a debate. The pros and cons are arguing on the basis of reason, reasoning and logic. But these groups don't understand how to reason, and they won't reason with you. They do not think about any consequences, and the purpose of their speeches is to "understand their thoughts" and attack others with endless insults.
He saw the content of an incident and began to argue with everyone who disagreed with him. Because of his life and his experience, he really likes to debate with people. I don't dare in life, but I can speak boldly on the Internet. They often feel that they have a full sense of justice, but in fact their own thoughts and characters are immature.
Is this called a debate? No, it is called a quarrel. Verbal violence itself is a quarrel, the protagonist of the incident is the only object of their attack, and the person involved will endure thousands of abusive attacks. Arguments need to be supported by evidence, but arguments are not.
If the objective reason is concerned, it is mainly because of the irrationality and anonymity of the Internet.
It is true that the Internet has started the real-name system very early, and all Internet users must pass the real-name authentication system before they can post on the Internet. This measure is also to reduce bad information on the Internet and remind all netizens to take responsibility for their actions.
But in fact, even now, there are still many apps that do not require users to use their real names, and even if they make inappropriate remarks, it is still difficult to hold them accountable.
For example, many social and information apps are filled with a large number of abusive attacks. If you carefully track down these users, you can definitely trace them, but there are so many people, how can they be traced? They just put up a keyboard warrior who uses verbal violence as their "opinion leader", and there is no channel to find those supporters who like this message.
The irrational emotional expression of the keyboard warrior has found a place to be fully exploited on the extremely anonymous Internet.
Especially after the self-media became popular, you can see by looking at their headlines, bland remarks can not be clicked after being recommended, but extreme and sensational remarks can always get people's excitement.
If such anonymous, irrational and emotional rhetoric is left unchecked or drifted away, it can quickly spread in the public sphere. Under the broken window effect, it will make the public realm a miasma.
Due to the imperfection of the relevant system, the risk of punishment for verbal violence against others is relatively low. On the anonymous Internet, everyone wears a "vest". The high degree of anonymity in online communication, coupled with the collective nature of online violence, also contributes to the psychology of "not holding the public accountable" and "taking chances" among these people.
Although there are many regulations on the network, the practical operation of these regulations needs to be further improved. Therefore, the risk of those keyboard warriors being punished for verbal violence against others is relatively low.
So what should we do when we encounter online violence?
It is absolutely not advisable to reason with this kind of keyboard warrior, no matter how many arguments you list and how much you spend, it is tantamount to playing the harp to a cow. The other party doesn't want to hear any reason or evidence, the other party just wants to quarrel with you. That posture is like a fight between two people, the other party just wants to fight until you kneel down and kowtow to admit your mistakes, and your attitude must be sincere, and from now on bow down in front of him.
So when you encounter someone attacking and insulting him, don't pay attention to him, because he is a person who has lost his mind. You just have to warn him once and then ignore him.
In fact, whether it is Weibo or other platforms, users who abuse cyber attacks will take effective intervention.
When the situation is serious, it is recommended to take legal action immediately after preserving the evidence.
If things are really out of your control (warnings, platform reporting mechanisms, blocking malicious users, etc., all have no effect), using the weapon of the law to protect yourself is the best way.
Just like the incident that Lin Yueya encountered this time, it was just noisy in the comment area at first, and then a small number of retweets. But a week after the video was uploaded, the situation was a little overwhelming. In reality, a large number of followers appeared, and then someone exposed Lin Yueya's Weibo, and the comment area of Lin Yueya's Weibo fell almost instantly. And then a certain big V jumped out and posted an article called "What makes us treat care as moral kidnapping?".
In this, Zhou Fangyuan can even see the figure of the water army.
He was really going to be laughed at, he didn't expect it, he didn't expect it, but it was just a failure in his pursuit, and he actually made such a big thing.
took out his mobile phone, Zhou Fangyuan made a phone call to his assistant, and at the same time, the address of this Weibo was also sent by him.
"I sent you Weibo, check it for me, who sent it, who is deliberately taking the direction of the wind, which company the water army is, and the situation of that big V, all of them will be checked for me!"
This is not the end, Zhou Fangyuan made another phone call to the captain of the bodyguard.
"You go and contact Ge Xiaohong and ask her to come up with a list, all the information in it, including that Deng Jie's, all of them will be sent to me cleanly! If you need anything to contact the headquarters, if you can't do anything, tell me directly, I just have a request, I want you to check these people, one is counted as one, even if he peed his pants a few times when he was a child, he has to give me a clear message!"