Guiguzi "Three Paragraphs" / He Yongqi
Guiguzi "Three Paragraphs" / He Yongqi
[Interpretation/He Yongqi]
Original text: Judge whether there is something or not, and what is true and false, and follow its desires to see its will.
Slightly rehearse its words and do the opposite, in order to seek the truth, and get its point. Shut it up for its benefit. or open and reveal, or close and close.
Those who open and reveal it will have the same feelings, and those who close it will be different from their sincerity.
It is possible or not, and its plan is clear, so as to be the same and different. Clutch has to guard, first follow its will.
Note: Guiguzi here talks about the usage of the combination! In addition, you can also see what his thinking mode is like.
Judging from the original text, Guiguzi is a person who attaches importance to "reason", and it is precisely because his thinking is based on "reason" that Guiguzi's "Confession" can be used.
Philosophical thinking is based on "reason". Philosophy is also based on "rational" thinking, to explore the unknown, and "reason" is very important.
"Reason" can be said to be the beginning of "order", which makes everything orderly. Without "reason," we will fall into chaos, and order and progress will collapse because of "unreasonableness."
Guiguzi's thoughts are based on "reason", so his thoughts can be made true (can be realized).
Ideas, ideals, and dreams, all of which have a long-term vision, can be realized on the basis of "reason". The gap between ideals and fantasies can be made true in just one word, and if there is reason to find it, it can be made true.
If you have a dream and don't do it, it will become a fantasy and fantasy, and then the ideal and wish will always stay at the stage of "dream". This can be said to be the death of dreams.
Compare "reason" to see the difference between "reasonable" and "unreasonable";
Group A, rational: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; Visually, it is manifested as "clarity", including clarity of thought.
Group B, Unreasonable: 720594831 shows "unreasonable", disordered and messy numbers, giving people a sense of confusion! It makes you unable to react for a while.
If you were asked to make something out of order, it would be very difficult, and it would be impossible to do it.
"Reason" is the foundation of philosophy, it represents order, law, and context, in short, the role of "reason" is "reason".
Where is the gap between dreams and ideals?—— "reason", there is "reason", there are steps and sequences, including different ways to deal with it, so that "reason" is easy to make true.
disordered, not even "wise" in the state. The absence of "reason" means disorder, and there is no way to talk about the context at all. In a state of "no reason," there will be a mess, and there will be no entrance when you go in, and you will not be able to find an exit when you come out, and it will be very chaotic! This is a situation in which the times are going backwards. Discord makes it difficult to start, and it takes a lot of brains to do it. How? Where to start? Is it the right thing to do? Because "disorder" is full of unknowns, and you can never predict the outcome.
There are two kinds of philosophical thinking, both of which are aimed at searching for truth.
The first is "rational" logical thinking, represented by the ancient Greek philosophy of Socrates (using rational thinking to search for truth).
The second type is "perceptual thinking", which is represented by the ancient Chinese philosophy of Lao Tzu (enlightenment, the search for truth through observation and perception). There are other philosophical thoughts, but there are not many, and they are basically classified into two systems: "rational thinking" and "perceptual thinking".
Theology, for example, is also a philosophical thought;
The development of theology as an ideological system is divided into two stages. The first stage is the oldest (perceptual thinking), which is to know "God" through "meditation".
Note: Meditation also belongs to "perceptual thinking", but it is not the same as Lao Tzu's enlightenment. "Enlightenment" is embodied in two aspects: first, it also focuses on "thinking" and second, "enlightenment" focuses on "observation", and thinking and observation are combined. Lao Tzu's ideological system, the order is basically like this: observation...... Enlighten...... Enlightenment...... Enlightenment.
Lao Tzu's ideological system is: observation...... Enlighten...... Enlightenment...... Enlightenment.
Let's talk about ancient Greek philosophy, which is based on Socrates' "rational" logical thinking.
Socrates' rational and logical thinking had two tendencies at the beginning: he (Socrates) originated from "perceptual thinking", and in the middle period, "rational" thinking dominated (rational thought dominated, sensibility secondarily; in layman's terms, reason accounted for 62%, sensibility 48%). In the case of Socrates, this is the embodiment of this kind of thinking, and in the case of the student Plato, the "rational thinking" gradually rises step by step, almost 73% of rational thinking, and 37% of emotional thinking. What about Aristotle? Rational thinking rose further, 81% for rational thinking, 19% for emotional thinking, and then it basically remained in this state.
Socrates' philosophical system of thought comes from theology's "perceptual thinking" ("meditation on God") in the early stage, and Socrates' unique system of thought in the later period, rational and logical thinking.
Note: Whether it is "rational logical thinking" or "emotional thinking", they have only one goal, and that is to "search for truth". When rational and logical thinking dominated, theology also changed from "perceptual thinking" to "rational thinking".
At this time, "perceptual thinking" is only preserved in Lao Tzu.
Therefore, the philosophical system of thought is divided into two camps: one is the "rational and logical thinking" of the ancient Greek philosophy "Socrates" and the ancient Chinese Laozi thought.
However, depending on the ideological system used, the harvest is very different. For example, rational logical thinking is "focused on constructing theories". To construct theories, that is, different theories can be established within the framework of rational and logical thinking, and theories are linked to social production. Of course, it also has shortcomings, not enough humanistic care, cold, and admitting death.
However, "rational and logical thinking" has one advantage: it has clear ideas and traces, and it can find loopholes and fix them. For example, the "tree structure" is a product of rational and logical thinking.
Hehe, the computer system program is the "tree structure" that is adopted, the main item, the subitem, the root directory, all the way out. This is the strong point of rational and logical thinking, and the thinking is clear! In this way, its theories and theories will be easier to realize. This drives social productivity while increasing efficiency.
Another system of philosophical thinking is the thought of Lao Tzu in ancient China. This is "perceptual thinking", the advantage of perceptual thinking lies in "tolerance", humanistic care is the strength of perceptual thinking, aesthetics, art, literature, under perceptual thinking, it is easier to play.
The strength of rational and logical thinking lies in the dedication and delicacy (craftsmanship).
The strength of perceptual thinking lies in abstraction.
Look at Lao Tzu's philosophical thoughts, it is difficult to explain clearly what "Tao" is. There is no way to make a characterization of the Tao.
For example: Tao can be Tao, very Tao. The name is famous, and the name is not very famous. Contemplation is the Tao.
According to Lao Tzu, "Tao" cannot be said.
"Tao Ke Dao" here says: In the Tao, there is also the Tao.
"Extraordinary Dao" is not an ordinary Tao, and you can't characterize it. Suppose you say, "This is the way... Such... In this way, Lao Tzu immediately opposed you, saying: No, if you can explain it clearly, then it is not "Tao". Ha ha!
"The name is famous, but not the name"; here it is to say: "Dao", not the "that" that Lao Tzu refers to, "what is the name of that", ??—— barely called "Dao". Therefore, it is difficult to describe the "Tao" clearly, but "the Tao exists".
The "Tao" controls the growth of all things, and the laws of heaven and earth are all in the "Tao". Yes, it's hard to explain, Lao Tzu said: You can feel the Tao, it's all around you. Well...... "Tao" does exist, but it's hard to explain, note: you can only understand it, not say it.
That is to say, "Tao", you can feel it, but don't say "it".
It's not that you can't say the Tao, it's just that you can't tell clearly, you're talking... Talking, looking back, you don't think "that's the Way" yourself.
The Tao is a real existence, which can only be understood, not spoken, and you have to feel it, you can't tell!
Philosophy is the use of rational logical thinking to explore the truth and the unknown. The answer is that there is "reason," and it is easier to turn ideas into truth with reason. Because "reason" has a law to be found.
In terms of probability, there is a clearer "reason", which is not only easy to do, but also has a high success rate. I can't even find my head without "reason", and I don't know where to start, which makes people confused.
Guiguzi's thought is "re-rational", which is a philosophical thought. Therefore, Guiguzi's doctrine can be used to "use".
Through "use", the desired effect can also be achieved. Because it is more operable, it is also easy to find the cause and fix it. Philosophical thinking is re-rational, and the advantage of re-reasoning is that the context is clearer, which is conducive to examination and repair.
What would happen if the "reason" in Guiguzi's writings was removed? Then it becomes a novel. A masterpiece of fiction like Journey to the West. But it cannot be used to guide life (useless).
If a novel is not built from "reason", then it cannot be used as a guide for life. It's also impossible to help people, it's just entertainment. Fiction can only be counted, it is a kind of entertainment pastime. The key to reading a book is to see what it has learned, which is the value of your reading. Reading novels for fun, laughing and then having nothing left, and wasting your time. In the same way, reading books that can improve your mind will help you even more! You can also use your harvest to help others, for example: answering questions.
What can make human progress and promote social development is "reason", because it has "reason" to be found.
From the point of view of thinking, Guiguzi attaches importance to "reason", so that his doctrine has guidance and practicality.
The results of his thinking can be put to good use, and after they are used, they can also solve the contradictions and problems in reality.
- "Reason" is the key.
To put it simply, it is a sentence: Guiguzi's thought is established on the basis of "reason". Therefore, the results of his thinking can be used to resolve contradictions in society.
Sun Wu absorbed Guiguzi's thoughts, and he used Guiguzi's ideas in warfare, and later Sun Wu wrote "Sun Tzu's Art of War". These theories can be used, and in reality, they have also achieved amazing results.
Guiguzi's way of "shutting down" is just two words - "strategy".
To simplify it is - "offense-defense"
"The Art of War" has a strong guiding effect on operational thinking! In the course of its use, it has repeatedly performed miraculous feats. This is very helpful to the methods of warfare! Most of the military strategists in ancient times secretly practiced strategy. For example, Li Si of the Qin Dynasty, he knew "strategy" very well. He funded the King of Qin when he was powerless, and Li Si paved the way for his future, which is a strategy.
Because Guiguzi's thought is "re-reasoning", its doctrine can be used to solve "problems". It's very practical, it's all in use! It can achieve a tenfold and hundredfold effect.
Horses don't eat night grass and don't get fat, you don't eat two bites, how can you grow fat?—— "Profit" is to "make profits", Guiguzi said: There is "profit", there is a need (space) for "profit".
Sun Tzu's Art of War said: Things... If you don't plan, you won't stand. This is to emphasize that there must be a plan, a plan, and both success and failure.
It can solve the dilemma encountered in reality. It can save you from danger to life! This is the ability to save your life.
Guiguzi's thinking gave rise to the military strategist Sun Wu, and also gave birth to the profession of "strategist". Strictly speaking: today's "diplomats" also belong to "strategists". Their main duty is to act as "lobbyists" - "tongues".
The purpose of the slamming is to "benefit". If it is favorable, it is necessary to break the gap.
I think that Guiguzi's thought is more practical in modern times than "The Art of War". Shopping malls are like battlefields, and Guiguzi's "Closing the Door" is to teach you how to deal with things, situations, and situations.
He said: Things, situations, and situations can be changed, broken, and solved, and the key is that you must "be able to use them".
It is to teach you how to control things, situations, and situations.
Generally speaking: Guiguzi has little influence among the people! He is not as well-known as Lao Tzu, but his thinking is indeed very powerful. Guiguzi's thoughts and writings belong to "sophistry," and it is very difficult for ordinary people to accept such knowledge in terms of morality.
In this way, Guiguzi's writings and thoughts have been ignored by people. Only military strategists and a few people with lofty ambitions will practice Guiguzi (strategy, attack and defense, and military books).
In ancient history, "strategists" became an important role, and in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, there were "strategists". Their views on the current situation have a direct impact on the future direction of the "country"! The status of the strategists is also very prominent.
Civilians disdain to learn from Guiguzi, mainly for moral reasons. They believe that "it is immoral to do so." ”
The identity of a gentleman is admired by the people! The key is that "a gentleman is virtuous."
But what about military strategists and strategists? They are the only ones who cultivate Guigu.
If you look at ancient Chinese history, strategists played a pivotal role in history. Sometimes, they determine the fortunes of the whole country and the well-being of the people! The status of strategists is far more prominent than that of generals.
They often stood by the emperor's side and offered advice! The emperor often asked them questions. The profession of strategist is also the closest to the supreme power. This profession is special.
The status of a strategist in the army is greater than that of a general. Of course, the strategist is directly responsible to the emperor when he is on the battlefield, and if he loses the battle, the strategist is responsible.
Note: There is also a distinction between strategists and high and low scheming, such as Zhuge Liang and Lu Xiao, obviously Zhuge Liang's resourcefulness is greater than Lu Xiao's.
Judge whether there is something or not, and what is true and false, and follow its desires to see its will. Here's what it says: No matter what you're facing, the first thing is to find out.
In the face of a crisis, the first thing to do is not to run away, but to verify it (the source of information). And then make a decision.
It's the same with doing things! Before you do it, you should investigate it and find out the truth and the cause. so as not to expose themselves.
It's the same with doing business, before you do a project, do your research. Look at the project, what the prospects are, and look at how it works. Clarify the basis of operation, and then consider whether to do it or not.
It helps you! It prevents you from being hurt by not knowing.
Insiders look at the doorway, laymen look at the excitement, things are different from things.
If you do the same project, someone else will make money, but you will lose money when you do it? So, before you do it, you have to investigate it. Then decide what to do and what not to do and how to do it.
After the investigation, you will understand the authenticity of the project and the operating principle! In this way, when you "do", you will also have a clue.
Regardless of any matter, situation, or situation, before doing it, first "verify". Remember: In a passive situation, it is also necessary to "verify." After verification, there will be an effective and effective response.
This will prevent you from doing wasted work.
Don't think that the concept of saying "bad things will be investigated, good things will not be investigated" is wrong. Guiguzi said: Whether it is a good thing or a bad thing, both must be verified.
Bad Things: Once the bad things have been investigated, you have a way to deal with them. That way, you won't look like a headless fly. You have to find out the cause of the "incident" and find out the harm that this incident will cause to you. Knowing oneself and knowing one's opponent will not be defeated in a hundred battles! Look at your own ability to bear again. Do it or not, you have to think about it, be cautious, be cautious, and avoid falling into other people's "traps".
On the one hand, you will know how this "advantage" came from. In this way, the "profit" can be maximized. On the other hand, the "good thing" may also be that someone else gives you a set of innings.
After verification, you will have a way to deal with it! This will be good for you.
No matter what you do, before you do it, you should first investigate it first, and then consider whether to do it or not to do it.
Good things: Good things and bad things must be verified! We must not be sloppy. Many people have lost their lives in small things (small things can easily cause people to fall).
Judge whether there is something or not, and what is true and false, and follow its desires to see its will. The second half of the sentence "follow their desires to see their will" tells you how to investigate.
It has two meanings;
First, it is the hunter's method, that is: how do you make the other party enter your game?
Guiguzi's "Close" said: Do what he likes, knock on the side, and fully grasp the "characteristics and information" of this person.
For example, what is his personality?—— what do he like, what do he need? Then, from his point of view, think about what to do.
Finally, do what you like, knock on the side, and maximize the effective information of your opponent. So there is an entry point. This way, your opponent will be able to enter your round.
If you see through the opponent at a glance, this shows that your strategic skills are still very immature, and the opponent is smarter than you.
You still think that when someone enters your bureau and closes the net, the other party will catch you first.
Your results, good or bad, are unknown, it depends on the mood of your opponent.
Therefore, it is said: "The bureau must be meticulous", otherwise, it is yourself who will be damaged.
Just like a kitchen knife, you can choose to do good deeds (cooking) and you can choose to do bad deeds; There are also two sides to the "bureau", which depends on whose strategy and skills are more superb.
"Let their desires see their will" are two meanings, and they tell you how to investigate. The summary is: vote for what your opponent likes, and summarize him as a person in his hobbies.
Your goal is to be a "hunter", and the more detailed you can grasp the opponent, the better! In this way, the "game" you lay out will increase the chance of success.
Masters and masters will also face off against each other, and what is tested at this time is no longer strategy, skill and skill. They are all masters, and they are very proficient in the "game"! At this time, skill is secondary. You say, these two masters layout, what do they rely on to win??—— the answer is: observation. In the confrontation, it depends on who can find the weaknesses and loopholes of the opponent.
The master and the master are all looking for each other's weaknesses and loopholes, and they rely on this to win.
Slightly dismissing what he says, and doing the opposite, in order to find the truth, is the trick of the "hunter".
First of all, from the point of view of rhetoric, these are "acquaintances"; at least two people know each other, but they are not friends with each other. Building relationships is the first step in "layout". Only when a relationship is established can the "bureau" cut in.
Well, from strangers here, to friends. Explain that the relationship is established, and the next step is to lay it out. First of all, it is necessary to identify the character of the opponent, and the character determines the style of the person.
For example, is it so-so, or is it arbitrary? These two kinds of people use different methods of "sloppy and sloppy."
You use the methods used by people with a so-so personality to use them for arbitrary people, and they kick you away.
Therefore, after establishing a relationship, first identify the person's character, and then knock him on the side. Yes, he insists on the point of view, you have to, try to refute it, see what his reaction and attitude are.
To do this, or to find out the person, this is one of the methods of the "hunter".
In terms of order: from strangers to friends, friends to acquaintances, acquaintances to partners, relationship building comes first. Then, cast what they like, see what they are wonderful, and choose the opportunity to "layout".
Everyone has weaknesses, and smart people make mistakes, so "hunter", you don't have to worry about not having a chance. It's just the timing, and the how.
Shut it up for its benefit. Here tells you, why "close" ??—— what is the purpose?
Answer: The purpose of the slash is in one word, "profit". This "profit" is a generic name, it does not specifically refer to, in short: profit.
So what is "profit"?
Profit: "Profit" is different in different situations. In doing business, money is "profit"; when two countries fight a war, victory is "profit";
The person who asks the beheading after the autumn is "profitable" to live;
For the hungry, food is "profit", and for herders, pasture is "profit".
"Benefit" is different in different situations, and the key depends on what stage you are in.
Guiguzi said: The purpose of the "Close" is for "profit", and there is also the skill of realizing "Profit", which is "strategy".
Those who open and reveal it will have the same feelings, and those who close it will be different from their sincerity. It is said here that for people with different personalities, the method of closing is different." People who can communicate with you, you have to use "love" to set up a "bureau".
People who are stubborn and self-serving, they are already invincible in the world, and they don't need anything. At this time, if you use "sincerity" to slap him, it will be effective.
Don't think that "it is impossible", the king of Yue Goujian, lying on the salary for ten years, he is just for a "bureau"; as a strategist, it is not possible to be impatient.
"Whether it is possible or not, examine its strategy, and use the original to distinguish between the same and the different"; here it is said: When you are in the layout of the "hunter", you should carefully consider. There is no complete certainty about the feasibility of this "bureau" ?—— how high it is, so it is better not to use it.
"Hunter", layout; that's not just one hand, behind the "bureau" is interlocking. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the use of "bureau" and where it is used. Otherwise, you'll be lifting a rock and shooting yourself in the foot.
Ending: Clutch has to guard, first from its will, here it says: hunter, when arranging, you must have two hands to prepare. The front hand hunts others, and the back hand is the way out. There must be a way out after failure! Otherwise, you will not live long.
The right hand is the "hunter", the left hand is the retreat, and the left and right hands are carried out at the same time. That is to say: before you set someone else's trap, leave yourself a way out.
The layout of the masters is both offensive and defensive! Before the attack, the retreat has been left. Actually, it's to leave yourself a way out, and then you go and hunt your opponent."
Thanks for reading, Relationship Attention!
Author: He Yongqi