Kishimoto is well aware that the way of management is not to settle everything by simply giving money. The reason why he insisted that the other party give the hard gold group ten places a year is not to give away, but to let the outstanding employees within the group be able to work hard for themselves.

Even if some of them want to change jobs, they will be afraid that once they change jobs, their children will have to change schools, after all, they are not employees of the hard gold group, and they will naturally no longer be able to enjoy this employee benefit.

That's one of the ways to trap them completely, and retaining good employees is a company that can save on recruitment costs and reduce the turnover rate of talent.

In the humanized management of the hard gold group, in addition to the new monk more porridge less, not everyone has the opportunity, but also needs the benefits of internal PK, it has already been established, and everyone has a benefit that includes breakfast, lunch and dinner.

The company also has a gymnasium, a bathing room, and a pantry...... It can fully meet the needs of late-night and even all-night overtime personnel.

Kishimoto's vision is to create a balance between life and work that does not require employees to worry about work. They just need to work hard, just like the past generation of members who did their best to the company in the last century when Japan's economy was booming, and called themselves "fierce members".

People are mixed around, mixed in society for a lifetime, and the most perfect state is that they can do what they like, and they can realize their self-worth and dreams.

Secondly, it is to hope that the children of future generations can be better than the blue, rather than hoping that there will be escapism from the reality of work and life among them. Otherwise, the results of my lifelong hard work will be much less.

In the end, at the end of life, I can't even die at ease, and I have to worry about whether my child can survive in the future, which is not only a personal tragedy, but also a failure in my own life.

The more long-term plan of Kishimoto is the emergence of three generations, even four generations, and five generations of grandchildren...... More generations of hard gold groups and Kishimoto family.

The best way for them to have no regrets and actively strive to join the big family of the hard gold group is to start from the baby, and then let there be a concept in their thinking, entering the hard gold group means success in life, decent work, generous salary and benefits, high social status and so on.

Meanwhile, Eiko Kitagawa fell into deep thought. The additional conditions of Kishimoto justice are not harsh, but they are a privilege.

Eiko Kitagawa did not have the same authority as him in the company, and said, "For now, I can't agree to such an additional condition that you proposed. ”

"It's okay, there's no rush. You can go back and have a meeting to look into it. I'm not too presumptuous. There was neither a single veto nor more votes. Kishimoto said with his hands outstretched.

"If you were given an additional 5% of the shares, would you take back this one condition?" asked Eiko Kitagawa tentatively.

"Don't say that you give me an extra 5% of the equity, even if you give me an additional 10% of the equity, it doesn't mean much to me.

If I really want to invest in education, then you are not alone. Kishimoto made his position unyielding.

Eiko Kitagawa certainly understands what it means to be cashy. As long as you have enough money in your hand, who wouldn't vote for it? In Tokyo, there are no private schools that are better than them.

Her perspective and thinking are very different from Kishimoto's approach. She thinks more about the question of who the other party throws to, rather than Kishimoto's goal of making money and stabilizing and motivating the employees within the group.

He also has another big plan, which is to wait for his own hands and time to free up, and it is possible to invest heavily in the education industry.

Many people have always criticized the expansion of Chinese universities, and long before that, Japanese universities had already begun to be universally educated.

The advantage is that it can improve the overall quality and education level of the people. As for the disadvantage, it is directly an employment problem.

There are more white-collar workers, and the oversupply will naturally form greater competition in this area, and the income will be less than before.

Blue-collar workers are also an awkward presence in Japan. Labor-intensive industries have long been transferred to Chinese mainland, Taiwan, South Korea, Southeast Asia and other places.

People who can have a good income in Japan are either highly capable in Kochi or have excellent skills.

At this time, in Japan in 2002, professional drivers, whether they were long-distance bus drivers or bus drivers, were hard work, not technical work. The working hours are long, and I am very tired, and I don't make much money.

However, in Chinese mainland, it is still a good technical occupation, the income is still good, the work is decent, and the social status is still there, especially in small cities.

In terms of education, for the wealthy, the choice is broader, and they can also donate their children to a prestigious school.

The middle class doesn't have that much money to spare. They can only abide by the established rules of society, that is, let their children pass a public examination to be selected.

If you don't get in, you naturally can't get in. However, from the bottom of my heart, I want my children to go to a good school.

Once the hard gold group has these ten places in its hands, it means that it has another choice, after all, it is an employee of the group.

I don't think that when my children receive a better education, the positive influence of their peers will change upward.

Moreover, it is not that parents, as parents, have not gone around gathering intelligence and investigating the actual situation in different schools. In poor schools, teachers are not responsible at all, and they will even wonder whether to find another part-time job, after all, the income is too small to cope with living expenses.

If it weren't for the salary, they wouldn't have come to work at all. Their requirements are very low, as long as the students don't talk casually in class.

For the students, the teacher is more like a babysitter. On the contrary, the teachers in a good school are quite responsible, and they do have the feeling of teaching and educating people.

A good teacher in a poor school will naturally be poached with a high salary. This can go to a school with a beautiful environment, respected, motivated students, and can give full play to their own strengths and take the initiative to extend an olive branch.

What's more, the students in the poor school are compared to what brand of mobile phones, headphones, bags, etc., and the students in good schools are compared to the grades, who is better in the test, who is the specialty, who is more brilliant......