From an objective standpoint, animated films are still a little different after all, whether the reputation is excellent or not, it is difficult to involve actors, and it is more up to the director and production company to bear the consequences-

Good reviews are the director's responsibility, and bad reviews are the director's responsibility. As for the actors, they are just a piece of the puzzle of an animated film, and the impact on the quality of the finished product is very, very small, and more strictly speaking, the feedback from the reviews doesn't even mention the voice actors, except in a few special cases.

Actors with a natural comedic flair like Jim Carrey or Robin Williams often have a voice that gives the character a distinctive character and adapts it to the role to make it look striking, while the exception is Kevin Hart or Arnold Schwarzenegger, whose voice is so distinctive that it is difficult to get rid of his own image no matter what character he is dubbing, and the latter's voice lacks variety, so that all the dubbing work seems stiff and clumsy, which can upset the balance of the entire animated film and be disappointing。

And so on and so forth.

Otherwise, review feedback on animated films will hardly mention voice actors.

In the most intuitive case, the core voice actor of the "Toy Story" trilogy is Tom Hanks, but film critics have never commented on his voice acting, not because it is bad, but because it is not good enough to be discussed separately, they only need to evaluate the work as a whole.

As for whether the audience will go to the cinema because of the voice actors, it has been a mystery until now, and there is no direct or indirect data that can give a systematic proof, the only thing that can be said is that the impact must exist, but at the same time it is minimal.

The "Toy Story" trilogy is well known, but only a small number of people know that the voice actor of the actor Woody is Tom Hanks;

These details are the best proof of this: voice actors, for animated films, are just icing on the cake, but not the finishing touch.

According to common sense, the same should be true of the "Super Marines".

But Lan Li's situation is a little special: so far, Lan Li still maintains an undefeated gold body at the box office, and after experiencing the ups and downs of the box office journey of "Interstellar" in the summer vacation, the whole Hollywood has pushed Lan Li to the altar, which has also aroused more curiosity-

is not only simply curious about when Lanli will encounter Waterloo and officially break the undefeated golden body of the box office, but also curious about whether Lanli's strong market influence can penetrate deeply into animated films and make the movie box office create more good results. This is one of the reasons why Disney invited Lanli to cooperate, and it is also an important data for industry insiders to observe the market:

To sum up, if Lan Li is the last and only superstar of Hollywood since the 21st century, then how far and wide can this superstar's influence on the entire industry radiate, how much benefit can they create through Lan Li, and does the development of the industry need to be adjusted?

At the end of the day, it's still interests.

To be honest, industry insiders are eagerly looking forward to Lan Li being able to further drive box office figures and even drive market potential, which is a good thing for all film companies and the entire film industry - Lan Li eats meat, they drink soup, not to mention, if Lan Li's rise curve can be replicated and another superstar can be created, then there will be more people who eat meat, and who can refuse?

Therefore, more or less, industry insiders have also paid attention to the box office performance of "Super Marines", especially after witnessing the Don Quixote grand party at Disneyland Orlando, and they can't help but gear up, like gamblers rolling up their sleeves.

Before the box office figures came out, the first round of reviews from major media outlets appeared first!

The New York Post, 50 points, "'Super Marines,' and even the title of the title may seem like the kind of quick-service restaurant that mixes together a myriad of elements into a set menu and bundles it with customers, and it can be great, but only if one of the many elements is excellent." Unfortunately, in this case, the answer is disappointing - just relying on a cute white man can't light up the whole movie. ”

"The Globe and Mail", 60 points, "For me, so far, the best work of comic book adaptation of superheroes is still Pixar's 'The Incredibles' - because they are all about superheroes, 'Super Marines' will inevitably be unable to get out of the framework of Pixar, lacking enough novelty; The lack of novelty is undoubtedly regrettable, but despite this, this work still interprets its own characteristics, which I can accept. ”

"Entertainment Weekly", sixty points, "Overall, this is a 'big white show', it's cute, harmless, gentle, considerate, and there's a little bit of humor." Therefore, even if the whole movie is full of flaws and lacks a sublimated highlight, it is still a work worth watching in theaters. ”

Like all popcorn movies, the "Super Marines" are also faced with the problem of finding a balance between "business and art", and the film critics are inevitably harsh, and negative and medium reviews are inevitable in addition to the praise, all of the above reviews have criticized the movie, obviously they don't buy it, but a little surprisingly, among the first batch of 38 professional media reviews, successfully achieved zero negative reviews!

Even the controversial "Interstellar" in the summer file also had a bad review, but the "Super Marines" achieved the feat of zero negative reviews, with only five medium reviews, including the "New York Post", which gave the lowest rating of 50 points, and they still chose the medium review over the bad review.

This also means that even if the "New York Post" doesn't like this movie, it still doesn't hate it, far from the level of a severe crusade, and 50 points is the lowest value in the first round of ratings. This is undoubtedly very gratifying news for commercial films, and it is now foreseeable that the audience will like it very much.

What's more, there are 33 positive reviews in the first batch!

"U.S. Weekly," ninety points, "I guarantee with my honor, or you can verify for yourself, that the 'Super Marines' are definitely worth the ticket price, and this is the Halloween 'candy.'" ”

"The Hollywood Reporter", 90 points, "The perfect fusion of Eastern and Western cultures, the perfect combination of scientific knowledge and entertainment effects, the 'Super Marines' has done it!"

The New York Times, ninety, "I wouldn't say it's the best superhero movie, but the reality is...... Sweet, sharp, funny, profound, exciting, humorous! The 'Super Marines' did indeed land beautifully: starting with an original story, through superhero processing, and ending with a warm and touching aftertaste. ”

The Washington Post, 90 points, "It's a pleasure to watch a movie because it's so enjoyable! But it's not the action scenes that make this film stand out, it's the soul of the movie." ”

Obviously, this is not a perfect score frenzy, the media did not collectively bow down and give full marks, as those reviews said, the movie does have flaws, but these flaws will not affect the overall viewing effect, both the review and the praise have reached a consensus at the level of entertainment, which is also the reason for "zero bad reviews" - and the difference between the two review grades is that the praise is not hidden up, and the review is not lost.

Can "Super Power Troop" become an immortal classic like "Toy Story 3"? The answer may be no, but is this work above the "excellent" level of the industry? The answer is yes. More importantly, is it worth going to the cinema during the holidays?

Ninety points are still very eye-catching, in Pixar's absence from this year's summer file, Disney lived up to expectations, handed over a good answer sheet, bravely took on the responsibility of the market, and won a round of applause.

This is also evidenced by other positive reviews beyond the ninety points.

"Variety", 89 points, "When you come across a work as interesting, exciting, smooth and visually wonderful as 'Super Marines', who cares what happens next and how the story ends? ”

"Chicago Sun", eighty-eight points, "The story line is slightly aristocratic, but it stands out because of the full and distinct characters, which is also the charm of the movie." ”

"Totally Cinematic," Eighty-Threes, "There are many moments when the 'Super Marines' seem too noisy, especially to create an effect of joy and humor, but these noisy moments do not obscure the delicate moments that have quieted down, and it is these moments that create a captivating effect." ”

"Empire", eighty-three points, "Following 'Frozen', Disney once again dedicates a soul-melting animation journey, those sweet, delicate, gentle brushstrokes, in a busy, noisy, noisy superhero story, successfully fall on the touching relationship between the characters, this is a touching attempt." ”

The Los Angeles Times, eighty points, "Inspired by the fantasies of tech otaku, giving the main characters of the movie superhero abilities, and perfectly making the comic fantasy a reality, this is undoubtedly the biggest success of the movie." In addition, the ending of the whole movie also sublimates the whole story. ”

Praise, praise, praise!

Yishui's praise accurately grasped the essence of the whole movie, those humor, those warmth and those cuteness, successfully impressed the demanding and critical film critics, and ushered in a perfect start in the applause; if there is anything that can make the debut of the first reviews more perfect, it is the "playlist" review.