Perhaps, I didn't move forward at all.

The so-called devouring feeling or gloom is simply because of my dislike of the character.

And I fantasize about being cool every day, and these devouring sensations may just be generated by fantasizing about being cool.

In other words, I didn't move forward at all, and the plump characters brought by the cool fantasy made me feel sick, and then there was a sense of devouring similar to moving forward.

Actually, I'm just standing still, producing plump characters every day and excreting them from my body.

And did not move forward.

On the other hand, it doesn't matter in itself whether you move forward or not.

Throwing away the entire picture element, whether the character moves forward or not, is just a picture element.

Characters can't be real, and this obstacle can never be overcome.

And there is nothing in the way of truth, so what are you doing?

The world is not real, and it will all come to an end.

The character is bound to die and is dying.

Those cool fantasies, those fearful pulls, are all characters trying to survive, and they use different means to let me continue to grasp something.

It's as if it's so happy to have a character, but it's so painful to throw away the character, so why bother finding it uncomfortable.

At this time, when the false began to use the Huairou policy, and when he used the distortion in his mind to control me, why didn't he discuss it with me in such a low voice?

It's all.

I don't need to be reasonable, and I don't need to convince people.

In fact, I'm not sure what that would have happened myself.

The so-called causal relationship has been lost, and there is no longer that stable state of life.

It's as if you know that if you study hard, your academic performance will improve, and if you know that you are working a certain skill, then you can master a certain skill.

Now, I don't know what's going to happen in the future, and I don't know what I'm doing will bring.

After removing time, the self in the previous moment seems to have nothing to do with the moment, just the visual element that is perceived at the moment.

There are too many things that can distract me, but fortunately, the picture elements do not present these situations, and I have to thank the picture elements for presenting them.

Those distractions were once called the beauty of life, the sweetness of lovers, or the happiness of family reunions.

It's all roles, all just to highlight the attributes of the characters, and there's a character there.

I don't want the role, throw away the role, throw away the thinking along with it.

There is no thinking, no more thinking, no so-called me, all the memories have to be thrown away.

In other words, see clearly, those so-called memories are just the presentation of picture elements, and do not represent anything at all.

It's all too easy to see a memory and make me think it's real.

It's not that I'm believing anything, it's that the elements of the picture directly represent what I believe.

The world looks real and plausible, like a comic book character who never doubts his environment, just like a movie character who is obsessed with the development of the story.

How do I prove the truth of the world?

How do I prove that I am really me?

It's not that these ridiculous questions have been solved, but that I'm ignoring them and distracting me with a lot of important things.

Of course, this is not a mistake, and it is better to sleep in a dream, which in itself is a matter of course.

I'm just disgusted with the characters, just disgusted with the twists in my head, and it's all just personal preference.

It is still only false to regard the killing as real, and to regard the relaxed and natural state of life as the state of life that human beings must have.

Since the world is false, since everything is in vain, since everything is empty, then there is no problem with whatever you want.

It doesn't necessarily have to be upward, it doesn't necessarily have to let go of attachments, you can work hard, you can be paranoid, you can fight for money for life, anyway, it's false, it doesn't matter at all.

The most fundamental contradiction in the ideas of the various schools is here.

On the one hand, talking about the unreality of the world makes us let go of our attachments.

On the other hand, it forces us to do something, such as doing good deeds and doing good deeds, such as being punished for not being good people.

So, the world is not real, so what is there to fear about the so-called "evil consequences"?

It's not me anyway, it's not real anyway, nothing exists when I wake up anyway.

There is no reason to just stand on the side of kindness, and use "life is like a dream" to persuade me to let go of attachment, saying that after waking up from a dream, any effort and attachment will disappear.

Then, since they will all disappear, it won't affect me if I kill people, it won't affect anything if I fall into a disaster, I cling to my anxiety, and there is nothing to wake up from a dream anyway.

It's all, and even if it makes sense, it's false in itself.

The world is not real, "what should the character do", this is not the crux of the problem at all, this is still just a matter of waste standing behind the fear.

I don't care about the character of Yuan Changwen, it's unreal and then throw it away, that's it.

Is it good to have a relaxed and natural lifestyle?

Is it better than being anxious and tangled, and then firmly grasping the hard work and struggling, wanting to become a superior person, and wanting to trample others under your feet?

It's just a personal preference.

Those masters who want to dissuade others from working hard, those who decide how life must be lived, are just nonsense.

For one, there is no way to be sure that someone else is a real person.

Second, it's just a matter of personal preference, and the so-called masters have adopted these theories as character attributes.

Maybe there are real masters, the kind of masters who touch the real ones, who can write books, who will teach their disciples, and so on.

But no matter what the words are, the more they are said, the more contradictory they become, and any metaphor is subtly misleading.

And, who to talk to is a key.

Everyone grasps something different, and at that time and occasion when others ask, the master said this just to destroy the character attributes of others.

Not everyone applies, and even, at times, certain metaphors seem inexplicable.

The most important thing is that there is no need for a teacher at all.

It takes a teacher to learn knowledge, a teacher to learn skills, and slashing is just to throw away knowledge, throw away character attributes, and suicide needs a bullshit teacher.

In other words, the teacher's only role is to tell me that depression is not a disease, and that I will inevitably experience the burning of hell.

There is no need to find balance, there is no need to appease fear, and it is all the way to destruction.

Killing is a kind of destruction, it is the destruction of all, how is it possible to find the so-called balance between "everyone is like this".

Kill or not.

After all, it's just a spin at the role level, and it's just a personal preference after all.

It's like people who like to eat chili peppers are easy to get angry, and people who like to kill are easy to kill themselves, that's all.

There is no essential difference between characters, and those so-called personalities, experiences, appearances, etc., are just misleading created by picture elements in order to appear real. (https:)

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: