What would you do without this?

The teacher's words can still be guided now, and even if you don't have everything, you still survive. Even if there is no life, it's just that the character has no life, and it can't hurt that awareness.

Because that awareness is everything, and if there is something that can hurt that awareness, then there is something that does not belong to that awareness. It is impossible to hurt oneself by oneself, and the premise of this statement is that there is one thing called "that awareness" and another thing called "wound".

That awareness is everything, how can there be something that is not "that awareness"!

So, the whole world is destroyed like that.

The character of Yuan Changwen does not exist, the mother does not exist, and a series of so-called things such as success, money, dreams, etc., do not exist. Since it doesn't exist, what are you worried about?

Unbridled play is the priority, and I don't know how this orchestrated dream came to be, but it's manifest at the moment, too real to be fake. Such a good playground in front of you, those ghostly nature, those man-made distortions, these are rare things.

There are as many distortions as there are people in the world. I don't know how to do it. When these distortions pop up in my head, it's disgusting. But when you think about it, isn't it fun?

Forcefully turned his own ignorance into a very definite affirmative sentence. is like the classic line, "If you want to be a boss, you have to deceive yourself first." ”

In this way, everyone is the best old Qian, the king of a thousand kings. Other mills can only show their might at the table, but I can cheat my whole life, so those guys count as a ball.

It's funny to think about your own low self-esteem. Why do I think that rich people are good, why do I think that the fullness of characters is great, why do I think that my killing is shameful?

Whatever you think, it's a distortion. I think it's important to have money, and I don't think money is important, it's all a distortion. Maybe it's not very well expressed, but no matter what I think about it, it proves that these things are still in my head.

When to put this stuff together with, when I'm really moving forward.

It's not ostentatious or inferior, really, does the two have to account for one or the other? Can't you jump out of the opposing elements and become irrelevant?

Everyone and everything exists just for me to enjoy this false duality. But now, the whole situation has been reversed, and they have become the controlling beings in my life.

They should be like NPCs in the game, I want to experience something, so I walk up to that NPC and interact with that NPC or a group of NPCs. When I don't want to experience something like this anymore, then it's good to just leave.

That is, to lose this NPC.

However, the current situation is completely controlled by fear, and he does not dare to leave anything behind. Looking at the impulse in my heart, I want to set off but dare not go, I want to discard but I dare not discard. If there was a failure in this orchestrated dream, it was undoubtedly letting fear prevail.

But perhaps, this is intentional?

If everyone is not afraid of life, they are playing unbridled. If you want to pursue success, you will pursue success, if you want to travel, if you want to be a bad person, you will keep doing bad things, and if you want to be a good person, you will stop bad people. Will this kind of world be boring after staying for a long time? Do you deliberately want to experience the feeling of being bound by fear?

But why should there be a gap, the ancient books, the saints who broke free from fear, why should they leave books to guide me?

I don't understand.

But everyone and everything should just be a tool for me to have fun. Just like my mother, I no longer want to accept the entanglement with my parents, so I just discard my parents. Why is there always a reluctance in the mind to lose all that virtual data?

Of course, if you abandon your parents, you will not be able to enjoy the pleasure of your parents' existence, in addition to not being held back. It's like changing an NPC and changing a map, and it is naturally impossible to continue to enjoy the treatment of the novice village.

Only a madman would think like that, right?

Yuan Changwen laughed at himself, the blood beads oozing from his palm before were gone, and turned into a faint blood mist. In the depths of the lake, there was no sunlight, and the blood-red blood mist looked blue. If you don't know that it's a blood mist, this dark blue diffuse is beautiful under the water.

There is a fear that if I really follow this attitude of indifference and abandon my parents or other things, will I be able to come back when I want to come back?

For example, if I abandon my parents, there is no restraint and no warmth. When I want to return to this kind of parental warmth in a few years, can I still go back?

For example, I discarded the so-called career upswing and ran out to play with my heart. When I want to go back to the workplace after a few years of running out of savings, will I be able to go back? Will I still be able to get a high salary in front of the executives like my colleagues who haven't left?

Maybe, maybe not.

Why do I have to answer this kind of question? Why do I have to think about this question of being enslaved by fear? This kind of question, in the mood of fear of life, is not the right question at all.

What stands in my way is the self-definition in my head, what the characters are desperately trying to grasp. And the question that is raised, if you want to solve this obstruction, has to be the right problem. And not a matter like this, enslaved by fear to stall for time.

For example, why be filial? That's the right question, not about mother's love, about parents, about being old. Of course, this is only for me, as far as the right question is concerned...... Forget it, there should be no official at all at this time.

Throw something away, and you can go back in a few years? I don't know, "can't go back" is very likely. But are there no other possibilities? Is there any reason to say that the possibility of "not being able to go back" is greater than the other possibilities? Or even to ignore the other possibilities?

Is it because of the distortion in your mind that you can't find any other possibility? Just because you can only see the possibility of "not being able to go back" because of the limitations in your mind, do you only recognize this possibility?

It is better to believe in the distortion in the mind than to believe in the dog shit on the side of the road, maybe the shape and color of the dog shit will provide a more accurate basis for selection.

Alas, a false is a false, why discuss so much?

Is it still possible to turn the false into real at the level of falsehood? The character is inferior, the character is afraid of life, and the character is afraid that his mother will know his current situation. And then what?

I always confuse myself with the character, whether the character can kill or not, whether he has the courage to move on, whether he will fall into fear again, it has nothing to do with me.