After feeling the flow, continue to believe that the distortion in your mind is just a sign of stupidity. Or rather, it's just an emotional tug.

Going down the stream is not a great state, discarding the distortion in the mind, discarding the hostility of life that is self-written and directed, it seems that it will naturally go downstream.

Yuan Changwen didn't want to continue to kill, because there was nothing to kill at all.

I wasn't deceived, what was the slashing of the slash? The distortion in my mind was controlling me, not control at all, just the presentation of the elements of the picture.

There's so much, why don't you destroy it? This hellish ordeal, why can't it be more violent? Destroy my sanity, destroy my composure, let me blow up everything in front of me like a madman.

Including yourself.

The face does not change, the mood does not change, and the calm is calm, who is preaching that these are good things? Why do you think these are good things? Are these words engraved with the words "I am a good thing"?

The distortion in my mind is judging, and why should I believe this judgment? Making a judgment itself is nonsense, it is a distortion, and the result of the judgment is naturally not worth mentioning.

Let me die, only death can put an end to this absurdity. Return to the truth, no longer in this falsehood. As wonderful as falsehood is, as subtle as falsehood is, and even though there is only a self in falsehood, unreal is unreal.

Without a me, without this thinking, the thing that comes back to the real thing is not me. Or rather, there is nothing detached from reality at all, and the very idea assumes the existence of the character, as if there is something outside of reality.

Truth is everything, nothing can hurt reality, and nothing can be separated from reality.

I don't know how reality is distorted into limitations, and it's not a logically self-consistent theoretical system. In fact, this is a completely destruction based on "non".

Flames burn hands.

Flames don't burn hands.

Of course, not everything can be answered with a "no", which seems to be quite imperfect.

That awareness is everything, and why does that awareness exist, how does it exist, and how does that awareness distort into the elements of the picture?

I do not know. Trying to find a plausible explanation is just to make the whole theory seem more plausible. But I don't need to make sense, the explanation is just a guess, and no reasonable explanation is useless.

It is impossible to say for sure that the speculation is true, it is just a reasonable explanation, but the reason itself has nothing to do with the truth. It is only based on humble cognition and narrow knowledge in the mind, and it is reasonable.

And once the time is removed, what's left?

Yuan Changwen felt that he was stupid, he had to overturn the theory at the same level, and he had to convince something at the same level. Time, what a useful weapon, everything is based on the assumption that time passes linearly, so what else is there to say?

This explanation works well and briskly, destroying everything in an instant. Continuing to grasp these falsehoods is just a product of emotion. And the only bad thing about this explanation is that it can't make me talk endlessly, and it can't make me seem logical and eloquent.

Time is so good, why don't I use it? Do I really still want to teach my disciples? Only this kind of reason will make me always want to think about my own killing, to make my words seem credible and true.

Think about it, someone asks a question, and then I say first determine the linear passage of time, then the conversation ends. How can this enrich the character, how can it show the aura of the first person in his empire?

It's really, the words and deeds of the plump characters are really seamless, and they start immediately while they are not paying attention. Of course, there's nothing wrong with this in itself, it's just the presentation of the elements of the picture.

I couldn't find a reasonable explanation for my actions, because I didn't want to use my thinking to weigh my words and actions. The twist in my head is just bullshit, and it's better to believe in the twist than to believe in the shit on the side of the road.

A brainless life, as if it's a sarcasm and a belittling, as if it's saying something about doing something without thinking about it and regretting it in the future. It's not a life without a brain, it's a life that occasionally has no brains most of the time.

If you have been living without a brain, then except for the basic physical pain, hunger, comfort and other feelings, those regrets, fears, worries, and ecstasy will not appear. These are the judgments of the brain, and a life without a brain will not regret or be ecstatic.

Will it make money, will it be successful, will it reach the pinnacle of life?

Will they beg, will they live on the streets, will they be separated from their wives?

I do not know.

The part that was worried about these issues had been killed by me.

What is in the mind will lead to what kind of words and deeds, and there is nothing to distinguish between high and low.

It is difficult for people who believe that "life is to struggle" to believe that "letting go of everything will come naturally", and it is difficult for people who believe that "God has arranged everything" to agree that "you must constantly strive to keep in control and let fear permeate your body and mind" and so on.

I've come to believe that nature leads to a series of words and deeds, so what's the point of saying that?

Changing what you believe will naturally lead to a change in the character's words, deeds, and thinking, so what's the problem?

It's not that if you trust God to arrange everything, then things really go really well, very well. It's just that after believing this content, the part that is not good to judge is no longer there.

And believing that you can control everything, believing that you have gained wealth through hard work, etc., will ask a simple and realistic question, "Have you lost any money?"

And I don't believe how satisfying it will be to be still in such a poor state.

Yuan Changwen didn't understand what was there to argue about, what he believed in was like program code, which showed a different state after being changed, what was there to argue about? What is it arguing about?

Of course, all of this is just speculation, right, how do I know that what I believe in my head will affect a person's words and actions? The visual elements show a combination of the two, but it does not mean that there is a causal relationship between them.

It seems that people make decisions based on a series of things in their heads, such as cognition, experience, knowledge, etc., but is that really the case? Couldn't these be direct representations of the elements of the picture?

"The presentation of the elements of the picture" is not an explanation, but only a description. I don't know if there's a causal relationship with what is presented.

The point is that the whole picture element is unrealistic, so I don't care what the content has. Moreover, there is nothing wrong with the presentation of elements of the picture that can appear regular or irregular, while presenting the characters as a matter of course for all this.

Whatever the character's brain is loaded with, it's all fake.

The key point is not the character, it is just to revolve around the character. (https:)

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: