You don't need to prove anything to others.

What a comfortable sentence, listening to it makes me feel a lot more relaxed. It seemed that for a moment, all the people and things in my mind disappeared.

Unfortunately, soon the characters will look for twists, "yes, I don't need to prove anything, but I also have to work hard to make money to make my life better" and something like that.

And then it becomes that I don't have to prove anything to others, but I have to be worthy of myself, and I have to prove to myself that "I can do it" or something.

Does it make any difference?

That's a good statement, but it's not the end, and I still need to move on.

If you firmly grasp this sentence, then you are likely to be played with by the character again, and even develop into "Look, I am a person who does not need to prove to others", as a way to show off and prove that you are different.

It's all self-definition that forcibly distorts the world in my head, distorts my whole life, and distorts my words and deeds about things. If I didn't have the knowledge and memory in my head, how would I behave, and how would I feel about what happened?

I definitely don't cherish a lot of things, such as the career I have, my family, and so on. Perhaps, it is just the instinct of the body to refuse, such as avoiding being burned, avoiding being beaten, etc. Other than that, there is no purpose, and he lives aimlessly in the world like a walking corpse.

Unexpectedly, one day, my target turned out to be the walking dead. It's hilarious, killing a character means killing "self", and anything I thought was mine, needed to be killed. The flesh is not me, the thinking is not me, and the self-definition is not me. After slaying these, what is left?

I don't know, but I'm well aware that what is false is not allowed to be kept, let alone noisy in my head all day long.

"I don't need to prove anything to others", so do you talk to friends? Does the content of the conversation involve certain opinions? And do these opinions prove that you are not mentally retarded? Do you prove that you are more knowledgeable?

If there really isn't a need to prove anything, why do you always want to give your opinion and opinion?

The full version of this sentence should be, "I don't need to prove anything to others, say this sentence to show that my efforts and struggles are all for myself, to show off that I am not living in the shadow of others." ”

In fact, he still hasn't gotten rid of the character, and has also strengthened the character's attributes. This sentence wants to elaborate, "I don't have any major problems, I just don't see through this." Now that I've seen through it, I'm no longer proving anything for others, so everything is fine. ”

Once again, the character succeeds in deflecting questions about authenticity, again preventing me from thinking about where these things come from.

If I really don't need to prove anything, then why work hard and struggle? I can say that I want a warm home, or I want my parents to stop working so hard, not for others, but for myself to want a good future.

The question arises again, why do you want a warm home? Isn't it to prove to your daughter-in-law that she was right to choose me in the first place? Isn't it to prove to others that "I can do it"?

I can also say that I just want to live more comfortably, but this is obviously, am I picking up garbage now, or am I not having enough to eat? Or I don't even have a place to sleep? I think I'm not comfortable, it's just that others are more comfortable than me, so isn't this a kind of source of trying to prove that I want to involve others?

"You don't need to prove anything to others", the person who said this sentence is certainly not trying not to persuade people not to work hard and not to struggle, otherwise, this sentence would have been despised by people long ago and not approved of today. In fact, there is not a single inspirational, chicken-soup, passionate, spiritual word that dares to openly declare, "Don't work hard and struggle." ”

No.

Even people who always say "let go" will emphasize that "letting go" is not "giving up", it is not throwing everything away and waiting for death.

No matter what you are working for and striving for, a career peak, high money, or a dream, it all comes from the self-definition in your head. And where does self-definition come from? Isn't it just the propaganda of books, schools, and society for so many years?

In the final analysis, it is still other people's opinions, other people's values. Moreover, any human perception is distorted, let alone clinging to the rudder of the ship of life in pursuit of a specific goal.

No matter how you justify it, it's the character who is struggling, and maybe the character can find tens of thousands of reasons to convince me to prove the truth of this statement. But in my eyes, this sentence can be thrown down the toilet.

When I first heard it, I felt a lot more relaxed. In fact, it's like shifting the self-defined weight from the left shoulder to the right shoulder, and it's really easy. But fundamentally, there is no difference.

The character will agree, as it will help the character survive and allow the character to continue to have many self-definitions on the other hand.

Effort and struggle here are a description of a state of mind, not a description of behavior. If there are people who have been doing the same thing for decades, but his inner state feels that doing it is no different from, it is not hard work and struggle.

Damn it!

Why do I have to explain what state of mind? I'm still trying to convince people, I'm still trying to get approval from others. "Look, how correct my opinion is, I have killed one after another, come and see!"

Shit!

No one wants to shut up, they are always constantly expressing their opinions and opinions. Really, I guess it's because I've been teaching my disciples for too long, and I've become accustomed to being superior, I've been used to pointing fingers, and I've been used to my own views being correct.

I've been thinking about how this can guide my life. This contradiction has been haunting me for a long time, and I always think that there will be a bright future after the killing, which will make my life healthier and more comfortable.

But who is the judge of a healthy and comfortable life? Is it a character? The so-called healthy and comfortable life of hunger is still largely related to money. And the slashing I carried out was obviously to get rid of the role, and naturally I could not guide life.

That's it, killing can't guide life at all. It's something I've always been reluctant to admit, and slashing only ruins life.

The simplest example is when I don't have any opinions anymore and I can't talk to my friends at all. Maybe you can only talk about chatting about gas and the like, and the rest of the gossip, current affairs, industry trends and the like, there is no way to talk about it at all.

So in the end, I just don't have friends.

It was very easy to ruin my life, and I never wanted to admit it, always trying to find something that would help me in my life.

Becoming a better self does not get rid of the role itself, but only makes the role more in line with the high standards of society and more in line with the truth, goodness and beauty in the self-definition.

Everybody likes it, but it's not true.

Isn't it stupid?