Thinking is not real, it belongs to the horn 'color', it belongs to falsehood. For more up-to-date chapters, visit: ШЩЩ.(7)(9)XS.сОМ. Books.com

I am only aware of this thought and the content of it at this moment.

"If you don't do anything, don't think about anything, don't work hard, will the results fall from the sky?"

Why not?

You can say it's ridiculous, but you can't argue with it, because all the arguments against it don't stand up to the killer "removal time".

So, the answer is still yes, I don't know.

Maybe, maybe not.

A lot of popular sayings say, "Thinking doesn't necessarily lead to results, but not thinking is certainly fruitful." But where is the logical relationship between "not thinking" and "not being productive"? What evidence is there for "not thinking" and "not being productive"?

Or do I just think that "thinking will produce results", or that "all results come from thinking", so I declare that "there is no result without thinking".

Isn't that ridiculous?

"You don't necessarily get hiccups if you eat a full meal, but you don't have to burp if you don't eat well. ”

"Eating a bad stomach doesn't necessarily mean that you will have diarrhea, but if you don't eat a bad stomach, you will definitely not have diarrhea. ”

Isn't that!

The fact that the results come from thinking is itself an assumption, as if the results of those thoughts really come from those thoughts. All I can say is that at this moment I am aware of the results of this thought, and the memory of these thoughts in my head, so how can I be sure that it is these thoughts that bring about this result of thinking?

Once you recognize that the results of thinking come from thinking, then it is natural to think that these are the hard work of thinking, and you will also think that these thinking results are earned by your own efforts.

But in fact, I can only say that at this moment I am aware of the results of these thoughts, and the hard memories of these thought processes, so how do I know that I really went through those hardships?

After recognizing the hard work, it will inevitably bring about a reluctance to let go. Who would easily throw away their hard work? If so, then the so-called hard work is not hard work, at least not in the sense of the word "hard work".

The point is, I can't be sure that the results of these reflections come from these reflections. So, why should I think that these reflections come from these reflections?

Since I can't be sure that the results of these thoughts come from these thoughts, I can't say that these thoughts produce these results, and I can't affirm that not thinking can produce these results.

I don't know how these thoughts came about, but only what I perceive at the moment. Forcibly associating content is itself a distortion.

On the other hand, since I can't be sure whether the results of these thoughts came from these thoughts, I can't be sure that the results of these thoughts were actually thought about by me, or that the results of these thoughts were really the result of my painstaking efforts.

Then, I don't care about these thinking results, I don't think about these thinking results for my own sake, and I don't do some behavior for the sake of these thinking results.

"Born but not had, for the sake of not ashamed, successful but not lived", is it talking about this?

The so-called results of thinking can be replaced by any achievements made through hard work.

It seems to be about modesty, but the truth is fundamentally two different things. When I can't be sure that these achievements come from the effort of memory, and I can't be sure whether I have experienced those hardships, then it becomes extremely ridiculous to choose words and actions according to "these achievements are my hard work".

Did I really do it?

Since it is impossible to confirm it, why do you have to admit that it is your own credit? After admitting that it is your own credit, what are the benefits other than being popular?

If you follow the flow of life at this moment, you need to discard these merits and go in another direction. Once these are considered painstaking efforts, then they can't be discarded at all, so what can they do except hold them tightly?

How can a person who is afraid of life easily throw away his honor?

It's not what the horns do, it's just what I'm aware of at the moment. So, why claim that it is the credit of the horn 'color'? In this case, how can it flow with life?

It seems that it has become a habit for me to lie, or is it that I can only say "I don't know" later?

It's just that I happen to be aware of the existence of a horn 'color', and I remember the hard work and sweat of these merits. But isn't it too hasty to claim that all these credits belong to horns?

So, according to the flow of life, I just happened to be in this position. What is the credit for the award, and what is the credit for the horn 'color'?

To admit the passage of time in the line 'sex', then fatalism must be acknowledged. If it is fatalism, what is there to rejoice in, or to forcibly take credit and not want to abandon the painstaking effort?

If the existence of time is denied, then these merits are only perceived at the moment, and it is completely impossible to determine whether they belong to the horn or not. Well, no honest person would take the credit for it, because I can't be sure of it.

Even more far-fetched, admitting the passage of time and believing that it is also a kind of fate to take possession of oneself, then does the horn "color" have the mentality of "this is fate"? When these merits are destroyed, does the horn "color" still have the mentality of "this is fate"?

To put it more far-fetched, it acknowledges the passage of time 'sexuality', but does not admit the existence of fatalism. So, what is the basis for judging that "taking these credits" is a good thing, or that "these efforts cannot be discarded" is appropriate?

Distortions in the mind, all these judgments come from distortions in the mind. So, back to the old discussion, what you think is good in your head, what is good in your head, and what you think is a limited judgment in your head, is it worth believing and not doubting?

So, if the world weren't a dream, I wouldn't believe it at all. By inference, how can a sensible person still believe in the distortion of his mind, and how can a sensible person not admit it?

In conclusion, I'm just an emotional monster.

Only in dreams can such absurd things occur, and they do not consider these absurdities to be absurd. It is only when you wake up that you find that you are completely confused about what you are doing in your dreams. But in dreams, how normal it is.

Even, in the dream world, there is no ability to think freely, just aware of the horn of the dream, thinking there, and making all kinds of nonsense words and deeds.

I don't know if the world is a dream, but my words and deeds are very consistent with the state of dreams.

Yuan Chang saw his own thoughts, none of which were his own, and he didn't know where these thoughts came from. It's hard to accept this statement, but I have to accept it.

Thinking is not real.