The shattering continued, and a trance made me see the loneliness, the state after the slash was completed.

It makes people feel panicked and scared.

It's as if I'm the only one in this world, as if no one else is a real person, as if there is no world at all.

Character, character, see how long you can hold on, see how long those twists in your head can survive.

There's no need to get anything from the crowd, there's no need to do anything for your family, those good sweets are good, but they're just not real.

I don't know why I hate falsehood so much, I didn't have it before, and I used to be proud of it.

When the family is not a real person, the idea of making the family happy can seem inexplicable.

It's like a family of NPCs that either turn into a deal, become indifferent, or just be happy for yourself.

The heart seems to be quiet in an instant, especially after the trance, as if the loneliness seeps directly into the heart to dispel all distortions.

Unfortunately, this is not the end, and even I don't know if that means moving forward or backward.

Anyway, I'm not done yet, it's the presentation of the elements of the picture, there's nothing to argue about.

As for whether it is completed or not, it is not this thinking that has the final say, it is still just the presentation of picture elements.

Whether I try or not, whether I continue to kill or stop killing, these are not my decisions, they are still the presentation of the elements of the picture.

Weighing by the distortion of the mind to choose, no matter what the content is, is.

If I don't kill, can I cause the kill to be completed?

If I don't kill, can I cause the kill not to be completed?

I don't know, right, I don't know at all.

What does the presentation of picture elements have to do with thinking?

The illusion of control, which can be controlled, has always haunted me.

Perhaps, this will be the key to a good life, but it is not real.

And I don't have much interest in life, I don't have much interest in life, how to make life beautiful, it's not something I'm talking about.

Ruining life, ruining life, ruining all of this, is what I want.

It's unreasonable, it's not cost-effective, it's pointless, so what?

Unreal is unreal, and I'm going to ruin it all, and there's no price to pay for it.

Fear is pulling at me, making me afraid to let go, and then what?

It's just the character of Yuan Changwen who is injured, what does it have to do with me?

Even if the character of Yuan Changwen is really a representative of a tragic life, an unfortunate life, it has nothing to do with me.

It's just a nightmare, and when you wake up, there's nothing.

As authentic as it seems, those experiences are worth enjoying anyway.

It is reasonable to interpret it with the character of Yuan Changwen as the center, but it is not true.

The point is, all this is completely uncontrollable, not that I can choose, but my choice is only the presentation of the picture elements.

What are you doing?

Or rather, it's just a chaotic state of life.

I think I can control it, I think I can't control it, the thinking is consistent with the scene or not, it's just the presentation of the elements of the picture.

Is this hard to understand?

Why did you accidentally fall into the role yourself?

No, I've always been in the role, and this kind of thinking is just pretending to be in the real position, pretending to be that aware.

It's a pity that I'm still just a character, and I'm still just thinking.

It is precisely in this way that you can kill, you can destroy the distortion, and you can destroy your life.

Falsehood kills falsehood, which seems reasonable.

It doesn't matter what I'm worried about, whether it will happen or not, it doesn't matter.

Because it was only the elements of the picture, it was only because of fear that it all seemed real, that I thought carefully about the trade-offs to avoid the catastrophe of life.

Of course, this causal relationship is only the interpretation of the pictorial elements by the pictorial elements, in other words, only the causal relationship presented by the pictorial elements.

Once the time is removed, there is nothing left to be arrogant.

What a good weapon, and what reason do I have to continue arguing at the content level?

The twist in my head still wants to be arrogant, but unfortunately, that's impossible.

What is the use of a short pull?

I can go from the state I was to now, so these emotional pulls are no longer powerful.

Of course, it's all about the elements of the picture, and I have to be very grateful for showing these things instead of being lethargic.

I didn't want to change in the slightest, and I couldn't change it.

It's not that I've gone through the past and led to where I am now.

Rather, the elements of the picture directly present the memories of the present and the past.

What to change?

None of this has anything to do with me, it has nothing to do with this thinking, what else to talk about?

If you want to convince others, if you want to promote your own point of view, you have to find a suitable, reasonable and rigorous narrative.

Luckily, I don't need that to hinder the killing.

Besides, what point of view do I have?

Do I say truth is kindness?

Is it unconditional love?

Or should life be merciful, accumulate kindness, and seek virtue?

No, none of them, what is the point of view, no.

Unconsciously, he has become a representative of arrogance, looking down on this and looking down on that.

Because whether it's one way or that, it's just a limitation, it's just a falsehood.

It's not real, there's no need to even discuss it.

It's just the pull of emotions that keeps me slashing and slashing, and makes me keep entangled.

If it weren't for the pull of emotions, these shit things would have collapsed a long time ago, and would have collapsed and dissipated into the void.

Perhaps, a person without emotions can instantly throw away the distortion in his mind.

However, it is not necessarily, right, what do you need to meet when presenting the elements of the picture?

The so-called logic is still just "I think".

Like, I think when you see an apple, you automatically think there's an apple.

However, the picture elements show that someone sees that there is an apple here, but they just don't think there is an apple here, is there anything wrong with this?

Even, the so-called "force is mutual", if I punch you in the stomach, then your stomach and my hands will be affected by the force.

However, the elements of the picture show that your stomach is not forced, but only my hand is forced, can't it?

It's not that my stomach doesn't feel like it, it's just that I don't feel it.

Can't the elements of the picture be presented like this?

Are there any hellish rules that need to be met?

I can't think of any logic in myself, and even the refutation seems so weak.

Fortunately, I don't need to explain it clearly, and if there are any officials who read this, I shouldn't need to continue with examples.

However, there is nothing to see, just kill it yourself.

It's not remarkable, it's not humble, it's just a personal preference.

On top of the false characters, there is nothing to argue about and nothing to discuss.

The level of falsehood is just. (https:)

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: