I don't know if my situation counts as depression, but if depression is a doubt about the world, a doubt about oneself, then depression is not a disease at all.

It may seem arrogant, as if I am the only one who is right and all of humanity is wrong.

I don't think there's any arrogance in it, it's like I know I'm pooping clean, and I don't need to prove it or think about it, I just know it.

What's more, a situation in which all of humanity is wrong has never happened in history?

Isn't it wrong for all of humanity to think that the earth is the center?

This is the case simply because "it doesn't matter".

When people say "the earth is the center", I still have to farm, I still have to work, and my boss still hates it, so I don't care if the earth is the center or not.

Since everyone says so, it's my new character attribute.

The same is true for depression, anyway, I am not depressed, so when others say that depression is a disease, it is just that.

And, in this way, you can appear that you are not sick.

If we admit that depression is not a disease, but that depression is like a sore muscle, it will lead to new growth.

Then, it also means admitting that the so-called normal people are all insects huddled in fear, and there is no growth in the slightest except for age.

Generally speaking, people will judge that they are different from themselves as diseases, so that they can prove that they are normal people.

Then, if necessary, perhaps through a long struggle, everyone will realize that this difference does not affect anything, and it is estimated that the difference will be recognized.

For example, Longyang is good.

It's hard to admit that depression is not a disease, after all, everyone's bottom line is that "life is precious".

Funnily enough, in times of war or when the empire needed it, this supreme honor of sacrificing one's life for one's country began to be preached again.

Since it is possible to throw away one's life for the sake of the empire, it is not a problem to commit suicide when depressed.

Perhaps, I am the monster, no matter how I interpret it, I will only usher in emotional resistance, and besides, others will not change because of my words.

It's just a presentation of picture elements, and it has nothing to do with my rhetoric.

My success, my failure, has nothing to do with me.

This happens because it can only happen like this, and there is nothing I can do about the presentation of the picture elements.

This kind of resignation sounds very uncomfortable, but after really accepting it, it brings not negativity, but a faint little happiness.

If I had congratulated someone on their depression, I might have been beaten.

However, it doesn't matter, they are all just picture elements, and there is no reason to present them this way or that.

So, thinking that depression is a disease, or that depression is not a disease, doesn't affect anything.

I didn't think about correcting anything, things would happen, and besides, that kind of relaxed and natural life was just a matter of personal preference.

The pain that comes out of depression is like tearing and sealing one's own egg, and the flame of anger brings forward, some people are willing and some are not.

After all, curling up in an egg of fear and shivering is not a bad thing.

Everybody's like that, right?

I don't know what qualifications I have to talk about this, and I don't know why I'm talking about it, it's just a visual element.

There is nothing to correct, and besides, there is no causal relationship, so what can we talk about correcting?

No matter how you judge right or wrong, it's just a distortion in your mind.

And there's nothing inherently wrong with an emotional "I just don't like it".

Downstreams still produce disgust, unwarranted disgust, which seems to be very similar to the emotional "I just don't like it."

I just find it a little hard to understand, like a group of NPCs in the game are clamoring for environmental protection, and there seems to be a touch of weirdness in my heart.

It seems that it is difficult to refute the judgment of right and wrong, such as human beings should be peaceful, life should be kind, and life should be sunny, which is difficult to refute.

Fortunately, I don't need to refute it at all.

Unreal, then throw it away, end the discussion.

It is a very stupid thing to summarize one's words and deeds, and no matter how you summarize it, there will be loopholes.

And with the stream, just with the stream, no one knows what will happen.

If you want to summarize perfectly, maybe you can only know everything.

Otherwise, it's just a bias for the sake of understanding.

Even if you say the same thing and do the same thing, it will make a big difference whether you go downstream or not.

It feels like the atmosphere that wraps the characters is different, one full of fear and the other is light-hearted and natural.

The intense fear would be so evident that there was no need to linger in such a scene, and I could not even find a plausible explanation for the feeling.

The impulse to help others in their real lives, the idea that the current state of life of all people must be corrected, is still based on countless assumptions.

But maybe I'll really do it, and go with the flow and just need.

So, why bother to summarize my words and deeds, as if I can find a few rules and regulations, and then I can express them perfectly.

Just like the law of vampires, avoid direct sunlight and avoid contact with garlic holy water and silverware.

If a mischievous vampire just jumped in the sun and licked a mouthful of garlic, would he be judged to be a vampire or not?

My words and deeds are norms, and if they contradict the so-called norms, then I can only blame the norms for not summarizing everything.

And the real summing up of all is the real norm only when all the words, deeds, and thoughts of this life are put there.

If you want to extract the essence and compress the summary, then you must deal with the so-called words and deeds that go beyond the norm.

It's not real, just die.

said so much, and then it was still unreal, it was still just a picture element, and a character named Yuan Changwen was saying something here.

Not only is the content unreal, but the whole picture is also unreal.

Die, the character must die, and I can't find any reason to keep holding on to the character.

It's broken, it's destroyed, there's no reason to talk about it.

Someone else has to be a real person for me to correct anything.

It's a pity that all this is just a presentation of the elements of the picture, although I don't know why it is presented this way, but only as such.

Even, my various reactions are just the presentation of the elements of the picture, those thoughts and thoughts, not that I am in control, but only that I am aware.

I'm not done yet, I'm not trying to summarize the ideas or better describe how the character should live.

Unreal is unreal, the whole character is not real, then everything about the character has to be thrown away.

Whether it's a character being beaten or in a car accident, or trying to explain the difference between physical pain and real-life mistakes, it's just a waste of time.

The whole picture element is not real, and it has to be thrown away.

How the characters live, this is not at all the core of the problem, on the contrary, it is a misdirection, a misdirection of "life as the highest guiding principle".

If it's not real, throw it away.

The character of Yuan Changwen is not real, so go to death.