Is human nature inherently good, or is human nature inherently evil?

This topic, Yuan Changwen remembers that someone discussed it very early.

But now it seems that there is no point in asking the question at all, and even this kind of question is wrong. Human nature is false and does not exist, so how can it be "inherently good" or "inherently evil"?

The statement that human nature is inherently good contains an unconfirmed assumption that there is an innate humanity in a complex set of human natures.

In this way, we can explore whether this original human nature is good or evil.

In fact, there is no such original humanity at all, so it's a fart!

The paintings on the white paper are all acquired, and it is completely wishful thinking to say that behind these paintings, there is a picture that exists a priori.

I'm just that stupid background, human nature is an afterthought, and there is no such thing as "original human nature".

The whole society is setting off a wave of thought, as if we just need to do good deeds. Don't kill, don't complain, speak well, be compassionate, be polite and polite to others......

These are just the characteristics that a character has. What qualifications do you have to judge others?

Is it interesting to have all decent characters in a performance? Since everyone is a character, why can a decent character satirize a villain?

It's as if the villain is fake, and the decent character is real.

Shit!

The avenue is wasted, and benevolence and righteousness are out.

And the former self still firmly grasps the so-called right, and then vigorously criticizes those that are incorrect, as if such behavior is to contribute to the society, that is, to work together to build the society into a better society.

In fact, I don't care about society at all, but the vanity of standing on the high ground of morality and pointing fingers at people makes me intoxicated.

It's still a trick of "self"!

No matter how much human nature is modified and perfected, he is playing with that false role. Everything is going on around that fake character, doesn't anyone think it's inappropriate?

Oh, it's still a question of whether there is anybody!

How do I know that my mom is real? How do I know that the people in front of me are real?

It's all hypothesis, and no matter how you interpret it, it's all hypothesis.

(It's hypothetical, but if I have this behavior consciously, then we can also think that someone else is also conscious, and not an intelligent machine.) ）

[This explanation itself is perfunctory, and the core is only before the first comma, "it is indeed a hypothesis", which is enough!

(That's true, but ...... ）

"Okay, but ......", "Yes, but ......", "The words are right, but ......"]

[How can we affirm and then explain negatively?"Good" is "good", "the word is right", then it is true, what should we continue to say?]

Yuan Changwen shook his head self-deprecatingly, just because he explained too much, he would fall into the deception of the devil. Entangled at the same level, you can never move on to the next step.

No matter what moral concept you have, what cognitive upgrade you have, they are all scum and false. I used to think of these falsehoods as real, and now I have to stop believing them.

It's all about moving on!

Since those things are false, I shouldn't continue to dwell on them, do I have to distinguish what is good and what is bad? The essence is the same, just like a lump of smelly and a stinking piece of, there is no essential difference.

Do you have to say that fragrant poop is better than stinky?

Think about yourself, how much you love the character, immerse yourself in it and hold on to it. No one is allowed to denigrate this character, and this character is not allowed to lose anything.

I can give everything for this role, and when this character is talking about the character experience, it seems super excited and happy. Because the other party agrees with this role, with a little admiration, this character becomes plump.

Who else but the "ego" would be like this?

The devil's deception is too clever, fear is only the tip of the iceberg, and more often than not, it deceives me with sweetness and coolness.

I, on the other hand, am happy to be deceived by the devil and call it all life.

Shit!

I'm going to get rid of this character, I'm going to kill this character, and no one can stop me!

It is true that no one can stop it, because there is no one else in this world, and all the obstacles and advances are their own decisions.

Are the people who have a lot of influence in my mind real?

After getting rid of this role, I definitely have no care and filial piety for my mother, and I no longer bear the so-called family responsibilities for my wife.

But why should I consider them?

Just because for more than 20 years, the social school has kept shouting in my ear, "family responsibility, social responsibility." ”

What is this?

Am I living my life, or am I burrowing into a model that I have already made?

Why don't you die? It's time for you to commit suicide!

I don't want to keep this character alive, can I kill it?

Yuan Changwen looked at his hands, and suddenly had a sense of strangeness, are these his own hands?

Giving up his role, Yuan Changwen has been saying it for a long time, but he has never done it. Anytime, anywhere, the figure of my mother and wife will appear in my mind.

It's as if I'm sorry for them for what I'm doing now. It was as if it was a heinous sin to drive away their influence.

Surrendered, still not done.

I always have concerns, I always want to control my life, and I always want my role to become tall and admired.

Everyone is working hard for their role, and nothing seems wrong with it. Only some people build their characters well, have money, have a career, or have particularly gentle and kind characters.

But these are characters!

Not me, not real.

Wait a minute!

Yuan Changwen suddenly thought of something, frowned, and began to think carefully.

There is a question here, which I have been ignoring, whether there is such a thing as free will?

According to my previous inference, then thinking belongs to Yuan Changwen and not to me. Because I am only that awareness, that is to say, I can only perceive that Yuan Changwen is thinking, not that I am thinking.

Then, it is Yuan Changwen who is thinking about this passage now, not me.

I am just the background, providing a platform for the mind to manifest and at the same time I am aware of the content of the thought.

So, who decided to start cutting down the definition of self-weaving? According to the previous inference, it was Yuan Changwen who decided, because I could only be aware of these things happening.

To sum up, you will encounter a problem that you have been evading, who asked Yuan Changwen to make this decision?

it!

Yuan Changwen suddenly felt that his scalp was a little numb, what is this!