There is no way to confirm.

I can't even confirm whether I am the role of Yuan Changwen, what else is there to say?

That awareness is everything, and without that, that's the end of it. The rest are the perceived elements of the picture. Whether it is the content or the rules presented by the picture elements, they only exist in the picture elements.

I can associate picture elements or not. It's just that I am aware of the presentation of the elements of the picture, there is no cause and effect before and after, it is just the content of the moment.

Those baseless affirmations are all nonsense and prejudice. I can stand on top of these prejudices, as I once did, but I know these things are prejudices, how long can I stand by them?

If you don't know anything, then settle for not knowing anything, what's the problem?

The point is, there's no way to know. I don't know, even if I know that Apple has landed hundreds of millions of times before, there is no way to be sure that Apple will land next time.

It's still a guess, even if it's a big guess, but it's still a guess. Isn't that hard to understand? The discourse that physical space is consistent and must be consistent is simply a thing based on countless assumptions.

Die fast, the character is not entitled to live. Even if the world is orchestrated, there is no reason for the characters to survive. Inaction means that there is no distortion in the mind, just going with the flow.

If it's just that there is no action, these are still the framework set in advance, and they are still the attributes of the character. Is there any essential difference between "I am a person who does nothing" and "I am a person who works hard"?

However, the character is here anyway, and it is already fake.

The water just flows according to the topography and doesn't think, but it still flows. The water does not say that it does not think about itself, so it means standing still and doing nothing.

Devour me, those mental twists are. But the protection of emotions allowed these distortions to survive, and I didn't want to touch them at all.

Let the emotions continue to protect those distortions, and let me see how long it can be protected. Every emotion, every worry, every self-righteousness, is all nonsense and falsehood.

Why do you always put yourself in the position of the victim every time you make up a story, and then fight back? Do the attributes of the characters have to be represented? Do the characters have to exist? Do you never stop fantasizing about the cool spots?

The characters themselves are unreal, and this kind of character-centered fabricated story is even more unreal. I don't want to know if these stories can bring comfort and exhilaration, or if this kind of thinking is inevitable in human evolution.

Not true, then it's over. Any attempt to utter superfluous words is just a quibble, a compromise. It's so extreme, there's nothing to discuss, and the three words untrue have already been concluded.

Well, just throw it away.

Of course, it won't be thrown away easily, and fear has been pulling at me. At this moment, fear still turned into worry, fear trying to eat away at me.

It can't be said that the fear that the bewitching woman is a bad person, after all, this is just her setting. Like a robot, it never stops doing one thing over and over again. Even fear itself is only a representation of the elements of the picture, which belongs to the limited category.

Die, dissipate, nothing can stop it from happening. Even if I was distracted, even if I didn't feel devoured, I knew very well that I wasn't done yet. And, when any twist in my head wants to be arrogant, I will honestly admit it.

How can falsehood still have hope of victory?

I'm still thinking about the teacher, and I'm still comparing the teacher's map, what the hell. Is there no way to get rid of this dependence?

Even on the road of killing, the teacher's words can be constantly verified, which cannot prove that the teacher is correct. Even if all the teacher's words are verified and I believe the teacher is right, it is still only a product of emotion.

What happened to me, is what happened, that's all. Referring to the teacher's map, I just wanted to find a lifebuoy that I could hold on to in the ocean of fear. But that's not a lifebuoy, it's a shackle.

Obviously, there is no essential difference between the words of the teacher and the words of the ancient sages. So, how can it be true? It is not the identity of the speaker that determines whether the words are true, or that the content of the words is true.

I can't be sure if the content of those words is true, and when I can be sure, when I pass by, the teacher's words don't have much value.

It's like I'm standing at a scenic spot and I've confirmed that the previous signage is not wrong, but what am I doing with the sign?

However, I haven't arrived at the attraction yet, so how can I be sure that the signage is correct?

And what I can't be sure of, I think it's real, that's what needs to be killed.

Maybe the teacher's words are completely correct, maybe I will find that the teacher's maps are all correct after I finish the killing, and even when I go back to teach the disciples, I will still use the teacher's maps.

However, the teacher was still not qualified to be arrogant in my head.

I believe in the teacher's words at the moment, just because I think the teacher is cultivating to the truth, so the teacher's words are directional.

But is this true?

Right, I'm not sure, it's just wishful thinking.

It's like I have a cup in my hand, so I wishfully believe that there really is a hand, and there really is a cup in my hand. Whoever wants to refute, I will not be reasonable at all, and it will be an emotional counterattack such as ridicule.

Because I can't be reasonable, I will fight back with emotion.

The teacher must be beheaded, and must be quiet. There shouldn't be anyone or anything in my head, and even if there were, it was just something I put in. The object has to be like a puppet, and I put it in and use it, so I use it. When I don't need it, then please leave these things quietly.

Must leave.

Instead of being as arrogant in my head as it is now.

When I walked past the teacher's map, I could laugh and say that it was so. But the teacher's map can't be my dependence, it can't be real.

None of this is true, so there's no reason to keep it alive in my head. Mistaking the teacher's map as real is still just a distortion.

Nothing is sacrosanct, and the question of whether it is true or not is sufficient.

If it's not true, then there's no need to keep grabbing. When I see myself grabbing, that's when I kill. Strong emotions will still be protective, but I will continue to kill.

I don't know, so I'm going to kill everything I know in my head. If you don't know, you should have an attitude of not knowing, I just know too much.

Thinking about it this way, the killer's words seem to have some meaning. I just deserve to die because I know too much, is there any chance that the character will survive?