Is this world real?

Yuan Changwen had already thought about this question before killing people, and the answer was the scope of "the truth cannot be determined".

But now that I think about it, there seems to be a contradiction.

If everything is that awareness, then objective things should not exist.

However, there is no way to prove that objective things do not exist. It's like there's no way to prove that objective things exist.

Since objective things fall within the realm of "indefinite truth," I cannot be sure that "everything is that awareness." ”

(Don't think about it, look at what we just did, how awesome!The woman has been thinking about it all the time, we just need to nod our heads, we can be her advisors, isn't it good to get paid every day?)

[Don't make noise!]

(Think, we're back to normal, and everyone is worshipping us and listening to us spit lotus flowers.) Isn't this kind of life beautiful?)

[Shut up!]

(Honestly, maybe we can really set up a sect and become our own leader.) With our eloquence, and the things we have learned in so many chapters, we are enough to stand out from the crowd. Haha! A new sect is emerging. ）

【Damn!】

Yuan Changwen found that his brain was a little out of control, and the "self" began to exert his strength again, wanting me to identify with these self-definitions.

Once recognized, then there is a sense of belonging, and emotions have been placed in the definition of self-weaving. In this way, the "self" can survive and continue to be nourished by the emotional pull of real interaction.

But then again, it's true, so many chapters of reflection that have yielded more than twenty years combined.

Further!

Yuan Changwen felt that he seemed to be a little moved, unwilling to continue, and there seemed to be nothing to continue.

But he knew that he had not yet awakened, that he had not yet reached the top of the mountain.

Now the question that is stuck is: Are objective things really real?

First of all, just because I see something doesn't mean it's real.

In this world, there are so many hallucination patients, they are also very determined to claim to see something. So, what they see is different from what we see, but they are all seeing, how can we be sure of the truth?

Secondly, just because I touch something doesn't mean that it really exists.

The sense of touch itself is a subjective feeling, one hand is roasted on the fire and the other hand is frozen in ice, and then put it in the same basin of room temperature water at the same time, then the touch sensation of the two hands is completely different.

But what about the hardness? I can't get through the wall, does that mean the wall is real?

No, all I can say is "At this moment, I feel that my physical body can't pass through this wall", is the physical body real? Is the wall real? This sentence says nothing but the reality of that awareness.

Could it be that because I'm in this world, I can't be sure of the reality of this world?

It's like red can't be sure he's red.

That's not right, so how did Jesus and Buddha determine that the world was not real?

Unlike me, they do not think that objective things are "inconclusively real", but directly believe that everything is illusory. Can they do it, but I can't?

Either they're lying, or I'm recognizing.

Because Jesus and Buddha are not gods, but living beings.

Yuan Changwen didn't believe he couldn't do it, and if Jesus Buddha was a mythical story, then it was a different story. Since they are all ordinary people, there is no reason why they can see through it and get nothing for themselves.

Or do we still use the way of nerve signals in the brain to explain the uncertainty of objective things?

Yuan Changwen shook his head, this explanation has one of the most fundamental problems, that is, the existence of the brain nervous system must be acknowledged.

And all objective things belong to the scope of "indefinite reality", how can you use a brain that "can't determine the truth" to determine objective things?

There is also a question: if the world is not real, why do you eat and sleep?

Since it is not real, then death is the best destination. But it is clear that he does not want to die, and he instinctively seeks to survive, looking for food and water.

So, can this prove that objective things are true?

Yuan Changwen suddenly had a headache, and it was really the ultimate puzzle in the world. If you want to give some advice to other people, then there is only one, don't ask yourself who I am.

This question is too lethal, even if you ask it, don't ask it so deeply and rigorously.

Look around, there are always people in the world who like to brag and think seriously about life.

Shit!

Those people don't know what it means to think seriously about life, they just want to express how to succeed in life, how people should allocate their time to stand at the top of society, and how people should keep up with the trend of the times.

I've never wondered, are these things real, what are you sure of?

But that's fine, if everyone thinks about life as seriously as I do, who will build a socialist well-off family?

In this way, those who teach people to work hard are actually good people, and they are actually maintaining the sustainability of society.

If I had been to promote my own views, society would have been in chaos a long time ago!

After Yuan Changwen complained a few words, he began to continue to think about the authenticity of this world.

(If I don't eat, I'm going to die, does that prove that my flesh is real?)

[No, the glass will be broken when you drop it, which can only prove that the glass has the property of breaking, but it cannot prove that the glass is real. 】

(If the glass doesn't exist, then how can it be broken?)

[I perceive it shattering...... Wait, if everything is awareness, then what I perceive is not real. It is entirely possible to create a set of laws that those objective things obey. And all the objective things are just what I perceive. 】

(This is just speculation, but also a conjecture, what is the essential difference from believing in the real existence of Western Elysium?)

[Well, indeed, there is no difference. 】

(So, if the world is real, then everything can be explained very well.) ）

[It is indeed easy to explain, but this is only one kind of explanation, and it is only an assumption that objective things really exist.] But there is no evidence that objective things really exist. 】

(But, again, there is no evidence that objective things do not exist.) ）

[So, it's still in the range of "can't be sure of the truth"?]

Yuan Changwen was unwilling and did not believe that it was such a result. Once objective things are real, then it will conflict with the definition of self-weaving.

Judging objective things as untrue is the best explanation, but Yuan Changwen could not find evidence to prove this, if it was just an unreasonable belief, then there was no difference from the so-called belief.

In this way, if you eliminate the unreal, you will become a complete sect.

Depend on!