If the linear passage of time is admitted, then fatalism must be acknowledged.

In this case, there is no obstacle to this statement at all, because everything is a fixed number, whether the character believes in the distortion in the head or in the heartbeat, these are all fixed numbers.

Like a fixed program, it can only be run this way. The word "hinder" itself means that one can choose to hinder or not to hinder oneself under the premise of having free will.

Ha, I accidentally deleted another word.

However, the linear passage of time is itself an assumption. If time is removed, then the so-called obstacle is because you believe in the memories in your head and think that your memories are real, so you will choose and weigh according to the distortions in your mind.

Strictly speaking, such choices and trade-offs also do not exist, and are still only a certainty. Even, even the fixed number is not accurate. Once the time is removed, then at this moment I am aware that I have these memories and that I have made a certain decision.

So, how do I know how this decision came about? Although I am pretty sure that this decision was something I had been thinking about a few minutes ago based on the knowledge in my head, the idea itself was just a guess.

I remember, "I've thought about it before, so how do I know that my memory is correct, how do I know that things really happened the way I remember, or that time passes linearly?

If time is not removed, then all happenings are a certainty, and naturally there is no such thing as an obstacle. In other words, this definite number shows a kind of free will, showing that it can choose to hinder or not hinder.

It's like the characters in the movie seem to have free will, and there seem to be many choices, but in fact any choice has already happened, and there is no such thing as a variable. The so-called obstruction is already a fixed number, so there is no such word as an obstruction at all.

Remove time, then the so-called hindrance is even more inexplicable. I don't know how this decision came about, I don't know how this thought exists, but it's at this moment that I'm aware of it, the thoughts, the decisions, the memories, and so on. Since I'm not making the decision, what's in the way of talking?

It's like a painting where a character makes a decision, and then that decision is based on fear, not believing in the excitement, and getting in the way of things unfolding. Can that character claim that it's because he believes in a distortion in his head that prevents things from unfolding on their own?

So, what's being discussed?

And what is there to discuss?

After removing the time, I don't even know how these things came about, or if I've experienced the events in my head. Then, the knowledge in my head, my so-called dreams, my views and opinions about the future, all came to naught.

Even, all the previous chapters, my slashing, the so-called hell to meet heaven and other, will be gone.

Time is strong in Lak.

Just thought about it, there is no role of Yuan Changwen at all, so even if any so-called pursuit is in front of "without me", it will become ridiculous.

Yuan Changwen thought that he could wipe his neck with a knife, and there was no reason to continue to live.

Suddenly, a dark fear enveloped him. Without me, without this thinking, without what I value, others will not talk about me, and I don't seem to be in this world at all...... All kinds of thoughts flashed suddenly, but I couldn't see what it was at all.

It wasn't a trance, it was a visceral uneasiness. It's not fear, it's not fear of not having money, it's not fear of how you should live in the future, or something like that. Of course, uneasiness is also a kind of fear, and this uneasiness is like a monster that wants to devour Yuan Changwen.

And I was subconsciously grasping the role of Yuan Changwen, and the uneasiness quickly subsided.

Damn it!

Now think about it, why should I seize it, why should I resist this uneasiness? It is obviously a good opportunity to bury the role of Yuan Changwen, but it is a pity that I missed it like this.

Yuan Changwen was a little annoyed, and wanted to continue to stare at death in exchange for that uneasiness.

It's useless, no matter how much you stare at death, even if you repeat the previous thoughts, you still can't come back to that uneasiness.

It is difficult to describe this uneasiness, as if it were a complete death, but not a physical death. The whole person's eyes seemed to be dark, as if the TV had been turned off. And it's not the kind of dizziness and blurred vision caused by low blood sugar, as if the whole world was suddenly violently pushed away.

This feeling has appeared before, and Yuan Changwen remembers that when he was very young, he was lying in bed and fantasizing about death. I was still young at the time, but I still remember the fear of staring at death, and I often try it before going to bed.

No one is in the same situation as me, but when I grow up, I don't feel that fear even if I repeat the same thoughts. I thought it was because I had grown up and become stronger. But now it seems that maybe it's just because the distortion in the mind has become so much that staring at death can't pry open the walls of thought.

Of course, who knows what the situation is? Maybe it's just an illusion, maybe the so-called staring at death is nothing more than self-righteous rhetoric. Completely self-righteous, who is not self-righteous?

For example, many people think that the world is realistic, so "the world is realistic" is not a product of self-righteousness?

Many people think that people should be kind, so "being a good person" is not a kind of self-righteousness? The so-called moral norms are to enforce and control people's behavior, and this kind of behavior itself is immoral, so morality itself is immoral, so what else is there to discuss?

Yuan Changwen found that he wanted to continue to find that uneasiness, which was a kind of nonsense in itself. For so many years, observation, summarization, and implementation are my own rules of action.

For example, I know what kind of packaging imported goods should be, so I have reason to suspect that imported goods that are not packaged in this way are not imported. However, the original assumption that "I know how imported goods should be packaged" has never been doubted.

Too much self-righteousness, too much summarization, makes me have to act according to the twists in my head. Just like now, "I think" that uneasiness can lead to a slashing forward, so I've been trying to get that uneasiness back.

But how do I know that uneasiness can lead to a slashing advance?

Right, this is my speculation at all, it is simply self-righteousness, and it is also a distortion in the mind.