Yuan Changwen found himself in that uncomfortable situation again, and his previous self would have thought that this was a good thing, because it meant the advance of the slash.

But now it seems that this idea itself is a kind of speculation, and there is no essential difference between it and the distortion in the mind that "no money is absolutely impossible".

Since I don't know if this discomfort means the advance of the killing, I will allow myself not to know. And there is no need to try to think about a so-called life solution in order to know something, in order to explain something.

I don't know, that's the best answer to life.

I didn't think so before, but now I'm more and more content with the state of "I don't know". Because of honesty, this is an inevitable answer. Perhaps, this is not a very good way to live a person, and it is not a life philosophy worth pursuing.

But it's just honesty. I never said it was good, or that people should want me to kill the fake. Just an honest person living an honest life and unwilling to accept the twist in his head.

That's all.

It's not worth bragging about, let alone advocating anything like that.

Why do you always put a lot of negative stuff on "I don't know", or why do you always think you're in control?

Since I was a child, I have received such an education, and many so-called successful experiences have also made me believe that I need to summarize the rules and learn lessons in order to go further and better on the road of life.

But where does this thinking come from?

Yuan Changwen relaxed himself, or rather, gave up on himself, and let himself fall into this "I don't know" lake.

It seems that giving up is a bad word. However, if we admit the linear passage of time, then all actions are fixed, and there is no such thing as abandonment. This is the only way to do it, except that I call it abandonment.

And, pretend that I have free will and can "choose" not to give up through study or encouragement from others.

And once time is removed, then the so-called renunciation is only based on the assumption of believing in the knowledge in the head. How do I know that what's in my head is real, and how do I know that the future is really going to go on a linear course of time?

For example, in the future, it is entirely possible that the painting style will be changed directly, and it will become some kind of alien vs. alien or something. And then my memory also changed, and my body changed, and the so-called visual field of view also changed, and I could see infrared rays and so on.

So, I want to control the future at the moment, I want to plan for the future at the moment, and the goals that I want to control and achieve like a pathology suddenly become hilarious and ridiculous.

Who can not plan for the future?

In other words, whose future plans are achievable and unrealizable? Just like eating at KFC, you can sit on the second floor or not, who will use this emotion to look at your future plans, and who will do this?

If this continues, will it become that kind of timely fun, regardless of tomorrow or the future? No, because "there is a future" is a guess, and "there is no future" is also just a guess.

Haha, I finally felt the so-called "just a little bit", it seems that it is really just a little bit.

So, what to do?

Haha, I don't know.

Not ridicule, not sarcasm, but "I don't know" in it.

Yuan Changwen found that he seemed to be becoming more and more unreasonable, if he had ever faced a "I don't know" but leisurely character, he would definitely think that the other party was crazy. It's just that this madness doesn't affect others, so he wasn't put in a mental hospital.

It seems to be a normal thing that I used to be controlled by so many delusions, and I still have no dissatisfaction with it. Now look at yourself, once yourself, known as the first person in the empire, phew!

So, what's the use? what's the use of the title? what about the protagonist of the era? fake is fake, and it's even possible that the template character isn't broken.

The main character is the dragon set, this is a comment from a book friend. Great, this sentence really hits the spot. Those so-called figures of the times, those so-called figures who carry the banner of the trend, and those so-called focus of attention are all tricks.

I am the only protagonist, or in other words, in my field of vision, the role of Yuan Changwen is the protagonist. And the other so-called protagonists of the times are all tricks.

Think about it, in a huge game, those kings, those successful businessmen, those giants, those romantic characters, those focuses, what's the use? These characters are just a trick to make the game more exciting, and I'm the only protagonist.

In the eyes of others, I am also a dragon set, and the so-called protagonist is a dragon set.

Wouldn't this game be boring if there weren't those focal characters? Those ancient legends are nothing more than to make the game look grand, and those characters are not just to make the game seem vivid.

In the game, what decrees did the king promulgate, what did the Guards do, and what new products did the largest chamber of commerce on the mainland. Excuse me, do these things have a lot to do with the player?

Or is it really big enough that you have to pursue these things? do not hesitate to throw away your game entertainment and desperately follow the heroic values that the king wants?

What are you doing?

Whenever I ask myself this question, honesty fills the air all around. In the face of honesty, there is only one answer to my question, that is, I don't know what the hell this is about.

Perhaps, many things are important, perhaps, many things are worth guarding. However, this world is not real, no matter how much protection is useless, because the unreal does not exist, how can we protect a thing that does not exist at all?

Just like slashing, how do I slay a falsehood that doesn't exist?

Remove time, then there is no falsehood at all. How do I know that I am a person? How do I know that what is in my head is true? Why do I believe what I think about the past and the future in my head? Why do I relate to the elements that I perceive?

So, what exactly am I killing?

Only by recognizing one's past self as real, and only by thinking that oneself is indeed what one remembers in one's head, and is firmly bound by the wall of thinking, does it need to be killed in this case. And I don't know if my past is like this, so what else is there to talk about?

Is the distortion in my head manipulating me at this moment?

in, so slashed.

It's not the past or the future, because I have no way of knowing if these things exist.

At this moment, I am still affected by the distortion in my head, I will still believe in the distortion in my head, and I will still choose according to the fear given by the distortion in my head.

So, slash and kill. ()

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: