I've always thought that my life could be different. I would imagine what would have changed if at some point I hadn't done it, or if I did.

Of course, all imagination will point to the beautiful future of the song. The distortion in the brain does not recognize the moment, and always thinks that the moment is not good and imperfect, and that more things must be obtained through the distortion in the brain. These things can be material or spiritual, and in the final analysis, they are the meaning of life.

This possibility is simply not at all, and the fact that something didn't happen proves that it won't happen at all.

Assuming that time passes linearly, if there is an omniscient being, then the future is a fixed number, and it is easy to see anything at any point in time in the future. For that omniscience, time does not exist, or time exists simultaneously.

Just like when I watch a movie, I can drag the progress bar at any point in time whenever I want.

Well, there simply is nothing else that could have happened. I imagined it because I thought it might have been this way in the first place. But in fact, this option does not exist.

It's like a calculation problem, there is always only one answer. It is only without knowing all the known conditions that one can say that this is possible and that is possible. This possibility is only based on my part, and there is no other option at all.

The distortion in my head deceived me and made me constantly imagine "what ifs" and so on.

Abandon the assumption that time passes linearly, and then all are just pictorial elements that are perceived at the moment. What's there to argue about? What's there to talk about? The elements of the picture are already presented like this, what else is there to say?

Even, including the imagination at the moment, is also the presentation of picture elements. The regret at the moment, the frustration at the moment, are all just picture elements.

Therefore, the only thing I have to do is to see the inevitability of these words and deeds, instead of falling into the content of words and deeds. Often many times, when you are caught up in the content of your words and deeds, you will feel as if you have been manipulated, and you are not a real person at all.

As for the question of possibility, it is entirely possible to use a movie for example. It looks thrilling, but if the protagonist is like this or the supporting characters are like that, it will lead to a completely different plot. But is it possible? Is it possible? Even if you are racing on the edge of the cliff, you won't fall or you won't fall.

Or to use a metaphor for a painting, which is already in the painting, what else is there to argue? All possibilities are just appearances, and in fact, there is no other possibility for any element of the painting. Whatever is drawn, it is what it is.

Perhaps, it is more appropriate to use a picture as a metaphor. Because the metaphor of film implies the linear passage of time and implies cause and effect. To describe it in a painting, the moment is the moment, and everything else is just a picture element, who knows if things unfold according to the picture element of "memory"?

Who knows if there will be a next painting behind this painting? I can't even confirm that the previous painting before this one is real.

The reason why something is considered real is because the last moment was too real. In the same way, it is also because of this that I believe that thinking can control life.

For example, I wanted to get a cup, so I went over and got it.

For example, if I feel uncomfortable, and then I take a shower and become comfortable, I think it's really because of the bath.

It was this sense of reality that didn't doubt the necessary at all that made me mistakenly think that I was walking in this real world.

You see, I said I'm going to get a cup, and I'm going to get a cup. You see, I was uncomfortable before, and then I was comfortable in the shower, and it was obvious that it was the relief from the bath.

However, I simply have no way to prove these. All of them are just the elements of the picture that we perceive at the moment. A picture element says "I want to hold a cup", a picture element says "I hold a cup", a picture element says "I didn't have a cup in my hand before", and so on.

It's just "I remember" at the moment.

There is nothing special about thinking, it is just a picture element. When the picture element of thinking is matched with other picture elements, it will appear extremely real.

I didn't say that these things were paintings, but I just saw how I took the uncertain things as real. The coherence of this thought, as well as the fluidity of the picture, makes it seem that there is no need to doubt its authenticity at all.

So, when I'm not feeling well, should I take a shower, and when I'm sick, should I take medicine? Because I'm not sure if taking a shower or taking medicine is as effective as I remember.

However, it is not without effect, I just don't know. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn't. Once I'm on either side of the binary opposite, it means falsehood.

How do I know if a bath is working? In the same way, how do I know if a bath is not working?

These things can't seem to be discarded, and the twist in the mind always wants a certain result. But whatever the result of this certainty is, it is not true, and it is an unfounded affirmation.

That awareness is everything, and nothing can escape from it. Because nothing else can be proved, but "I exist" can be proved.

The brainwashing of science is more powerful than imagined. It seems that daily life is full of rules, for example, when I walk forward, my body will move forward. But all the observed phenomena do not exist at all, so what laws can we talk about?

If there is an objective fact, then I continue to observe this objective fact and do not think about whether this objective fact is true or not. What needs to be done is to think about a reasonable explanation on the basis of this objective fact.

For example, if Apple lands, I don't doubt whether Apple has landed, and whether Apple will be covered next time, I directly assume that Apple will always land. Then, on the basis of ignoring this assumption, we think about all kinds of speculations to explain why Apple landed forever.

Isn't that? What's the difference between science and myth?

It's the brainwashing of science that makes me believe that I just didn't find the right way. Truth is truth, falsehood is falsehood, even if it is helpful to life, even if it is more attractive, it cannot make falsehood true.

Since it is false, there is no reason to be arrogant in my head. I never doubted the scientific knowledge that I believed in.

I can't prove it, but I firmly believe that this is brainwashing. Is there any difference with the rhetoric of heaven, reincarnation, Elysium, consummation, etc.?

Yuan Changwen found that he might become a fool in the future, and he didn't know this or that. However, there is no noise in the head to hear the song of the world.