A faint peace slowly rose, not the same ease as before, nor some ecstasy, just a faint peace.

Unhurried, there doesn't seem to be anything to do, but I feel like it's a good thing to be alive.

You don't have to travel, you don't have to see the scenery, you don't have to go to great lengths to prove yourself, let alone get to the top of your life. It seems that the whole person has become a lot lazy, but there is no complaint, and there is no sense of boredom.

Unlike before, the feeling of relaxation hit the whole person and I couldn't help but want to dance. At this point, it seems that there is no idea what to do. I wanted to concentrate on the killing, but I found that there seemed to be nothing worth killing, and even the act of killing itself was full of absurdity.

Even, at the mention of the word slashing, I was a little uncomfortable. It's not the discomfort it used to be, it's that I don't like the discomfort that twists in my head.

When did slashing also become a twist?

Yuan Changwen is a little unclear, but there is no need to delve into it, what can I understand? Let all this slowly take shape, anyway, the role of Yuan Changwen has nothing to do with me.

Not only does it have nothing to do with it, but the character of Yuan Changwen also thinks that he is very important, and his thinking belongs to God's gift and the like. It's the character of Yuan Changwen who has to have something to do with me, and it's the arrogance that the character is always self-righteous.

This thinking is not important, everything about the character is not important. The reason why it is considered important is that the characters themselves are judging. Right, the character's mind judges what is important, not the thing itself that says "I am important".

In this case, of course, the character's thinking will determine that the character itself is important. If the character is not important, then the associated character-related attributes will become unimportant, and this kind of thing will embarrass the character.

So, this reflection is not a good thing either.

Although I have been taught that my brain does not rust or anything like that, I have always been taught that the human brain has infinite potential. Keep thinking, keep learning new knowledge, and then think more.

Zhuangzi's sentence, "My life has an end, and knowledge has no end." There are all kinds of explanations, anyway, it will not be interpreted as discarding knowledge. Who would dare to say that? Who would dare to oppose the mainstream in such a way? Who would really think that knowledge is useless?

If Zhuangzi touches the truth, then this sentence is said to us who are being killed. Whatever knowledge it is, it's just a distortion. And this distortion is of no use other than to prevent me from touching the truth. If you don't discard this distorted knowledge, how can you touch the truth?

However, for a false character in a binary world, knowledge is quite useful. You can improve your knowledge, you can appear knowledgeable, you can increase your conversational temperament, you can get a diploma to get a better job, you can understand the whole world more easily......

These are already two divisions, one is real, and it exists to destroy life. On the other hand, it is necessary to enjoy the whole dream, and naturally need to plump up the character attributes.

How can the existence of a plump character understand what is real, and how can he figure out these meaningless killing behaviors?

Just like Bai Juyi wrote, "The speaker is not as good as the knower, I heard this saying in Laojun, if Laojun is a knower, why do you have 5,000 words", why did Lao Tzu write the "Tao Te Ching"? Since everything is wrong, why do you still have to leave 5,000 words?

If Lao Tzu touches the truth, then he will inevitably not continue to think, but just move forward with the flow of life. When the universe needed a book, Lao Tzu just obeyed this flow and wrote these 5,000 words.

There is indeed nothing to say, the whole text of the Tao Te Ching does not talk about what is "Tao", but what is not Tao. And use metaphors to show some characteristics of the "Tao", such as the good as water.

Since there is no thinking, and it is not weighed by the distortion in the mind, it is difficult for ordinary people to speculate on natural behavior. Who knows what is needed for the flow of life?

It is not that you will stop talking because you declare that "silence is golden", but on the contrary, it is likely to turn into rhetoric. After touching the real, the character no longer exists, and the character will not need to hold on to a certain self-definition and not let go. In this way, the characters become casual and unruly.

Because in any case, the characters are fake. The man called Lao Tzu is no more real than me, nor is he more real than this tree. Nothing is worth obeying, and nothing is worth affirming. There is no longer a need to fix a role, and there is no longer any need to put some effort into fixing a role.

For example, I am a hard-working person, I am a filial person, and I am a person who likes to travel......

The twist in my head is always trying to figure things out, but in fact I can never figure things out. It is impossible to find an explanation to fit the distortion in the mind because of the limited knowledge in the mind and the humble knowledge. If no explanation can be found, then it is a lie and it is ridiculous.

In addition, some of the problems seem to go straight to the core, but they are actually just waste problems. It's like the first step in swimming is not being afraid of water, and then someone asks, "Why don't you breathe in the water if you're not afraid of it?" or, "Why don't you eat in the water if you're not afraid of it?"

No one would want to answer such a question.

After Lao Tzu left the 5,000-word Tao Te Ching, it disappeared directly. If Lao Tzu really touches the truth, this behavior is completely understandable. Who would want to talk to someone whose mind is full of twists? And the other person still clings to their twisted hands and doesn't let go, forcing them to explain anything as their own twisted mind can understand.

"I don't know" isn't a mistake, it's just that the empire claims that not knowing is a bad state, so I avoid not knowing. In addition, the more the character must know something, the more it can effectively cover up the reality that "that awareness is everything", and the real existence of the character itself can be affirmed.

I don't know, why should I know?

That's the good question.

Yuan Changwen felt a little awkward, and unconsciously returned to the previous state of preaching.

What am I doing? Why are I talking so much here?

No matter how you say it, it's false, and how you write it. But this does not mean that you do not think and write words, which can effectively see the distortions in your mind.

If you can decide that everything is false, then you don't need to say anything more and write something. At that time, I was done, and now, I am not done.

Since I can't see everything as false, then I naturally have to use thinking to kill falsehood, the so-called fighting poison with poison?

These waste questions, which are only asked by the twists of the mind, are aimed at giving up the killing.