In fact, I had no control over how things turned out.

The reason why I think it can be controlled is based on cause and effect. As if, A leads to B, then controlling A controls B. But this causal relationship is only one's own guess, not just that it cannot be fully known, but that the causal relationship itself does not exist.

Since you can't control it, the fear in your head seems very nonsense. It's like a rooster constantly forcing himself to think that he can't make the sun rise if he doesn't crow.

Is there a relationship between the two?

Any kind of causality can be asked like this, and then it turns out that there is no relationship at all. Even if there is a relationship, the obvious relationship is just your own speculation.

That's how it happened, what's the problem? Is there any causal relationship needed? Of course, the picture elements may show the corresponding cause and effect, but that is also just the presentation of the picture elements.

And what didn't happen, would it happen because of these causal relationships?

The sun will rise tomorrow, that's just speculation, right. Even if you affirm yourself, it is only a guess, and this affirmation is only the product of emotion. Logically, such affirmation cannot be generated.

And I was easily persuaded because whether the sun rises or not has little to do with me, and no one will be afraid of whether the sun will rise tomorrow and be restless. If there is, then the person should be in a psychiatric hospital.

You can't let go of life events, it seems to be very important, you have to be under your control. It's really nonsense, I can't control it, but I want to control it. There is no causal relationship, but they try to find the causal relationship, and firmly grasp the causal relationship that is not causal relationship.

Ridiculous.

The funny thing is that when fear comes, you can't think of anything ridiculous or not, and hurry up and do things with the tide of fear. Of course, maybe it's going to be good, it's going to be motivating and it's going to make you want to be who you want to be.

However, unreal is unreal. I'm not trying to be a better person, and these falsehoods don't have the right to influence me, not to be presumptuous in my head.

If I think something is important, then I can also think that something is not important. But now, important things are ingrained in my mind, and I can't change them in the slightest. Once it changes, it's either overwritten with something else important, or it's a baptism of fear.

How can you let go? The twist in your head is whistling, how can you get rid of these things?

Life is in the world, and there is only one life...... A series of baseless affirmations, blowing like a gust of wind. Do I have the power to parry, can I get rid of this?

Why do characters still exist? These thoughts are not me at all, and I don't understand how these thoughts are presented, or how they think, and why they are presented.

It seems that everything is justified, and all this is developed in this way according to the linear passage of time. There is a world, there is a me, and then I observe and analyze the world, and I come to a series of conclusions.

While these conclusions may not be correct, that's how the process goes. I never doubted the reality of the world, and I never thought that this thinking was not under my control.

None of this makes sense, it's like magic.

It's easy for me to regret that if I had done something, it might have been a different state at the moment. But how can I be sure that something in the past really happened, and how do I know that the current state really has something to do with the past?

It's just a presentation of the elements of the picture, that's all. Those regrets are nothing more than based on the linear passage of time, believing that all this really happened, that the present moment is formed by the accumulation of the past.

.

It's just speculation, right, I can totally say that everything is alien manipulation, my memories are transplanted or something.

Only at this moment, it is only the presentation of the elements of the picture. Those causal relationships are also just the presentation of picture elements. Is there anything wrong with things happening this way, because things can only happen this way, because that's how the picture elements are presented?

The phrase "already known" is simply, based on a series of unfounded assumptions, and instead of thinking about assumptions, only focusing on emotions.

The question is, are emotions really the product of interaction with reality? The elements of the picture present the so-called reality, and then the mind sees these realities and then produces emotions? Is that true?

Aren't emotions a limitation? Aren't emotions an element of the picture that is perceived? Aren't emotions the content of awareness?

So, how do I know what emotions are going to be? How do I know what causes emotions to arise? It seems like a realistic interaction, but is it really?

I don't know, right, like the last moment was very real but couldn't prove its existence. The same goes for emotions, which seem to be the product of interaction, but I still can't prove it.

Is there a relationship between the fact that the elements of the picture present a mood and present a reality?

Yuan Changwen suddenly found that his thinking about the content of fear had completely become nonsense. Since it is impossible to confirm whether the fear is caused by the content of the fear, then the analysis of the content of the fear is just a joke.

It's because I know too much that I lead to this kind of nonsense. Moreover, this knowledge is just a guess, a distortion in the mind!

Yuan Changwen didn't quite understand how these things controlled him, but he was there to manipulate them.

Yes, I don't know if the content of fear causes fear, and I don't know what emotions are the product of real-world interactions. Just like in the game, the peasants build houses, is it really because the peasants build the houses?

If it's not real, it should be discarded. Rather than a discussion based on some kind of assumption, maybe psychology needs these things, maybe scientists have to work that way. But for me, unreality means not existing, that is, not qualified to stay in the head.

It's not a better life, it's not a more transparent life, it's a killing.

The role of Yuan Changwen is false and does not exist. Of course, there is not a thing called Yuan Changwen, but a lot of emotional products, a lot of tightly clinging anchors, which together constitute the character of Yuan Changwen.

I'm not going to cut them one by one, I'm going to set them on fire. The non-existence of the unreal, even if it is manifest, cannot change its false nature.

What reason do these falsehoods have to control me?

Or why should I admit these falsehoods?

The elements of the picture present the thinking of "I admit these falsehoods", huh? ()

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: