Fear comes, not to argue about what won't happen, or to say that it's just your own imagination. Instead, ask yourself, why can't it happen?

Why can't your home be stolen? because you don't want to lose your belongings.

Why don't you want to lose your belongings?

This question seems absurd, but when you think about it, you can't say a clear answer. It's an emotional answer that you don't want to, or of course you can't.

It's not real at all, it's that you don't want to lose your belongings. This unwillingness is self-definition, and it is made up out of nothing. It is precisely because of these self-definitions that the role of Yuan Changwen is formed.

It doesn't matter if this is this, it doesn't matter if that, kill people today and save people tomorrow, the same scene, this time it's this choice, next time it's another choice. Excuse me, what kind of senses does this kind of character give people? Without a uniform rule, without self-definition to be comfortable, can this kind of character really be endearing?

Of course, what other people's eyes, what other people's love, these things do not exist. All thoughts about other people are just "I think". I never know what's going on in other people's heads, I just know what "I think" in other people's heads.

All the elements of the picture are related to me, where is the others?

I assume that others are true, I assume that I can perfectly understand each other's words, I assume that these mainstream aesthetics are also agreed by others, and I assume that these three views are recognized by everyone......

It's all "I think".

Don't care about other people's eyes? Where is the other person's vision? It's just "I think" in your own head, what does it have to do with others?

I can never care about other people's eyes, because I don't know what other people's eyes are. Everything is about oneself, there is no so-called objective thing at all, everything is just a distortion in one's own mind.

The table is made of wood, and the full expression of this sentence is, "In my limited knowledge and cognition, I think the table is wooden", does this have anything to do with the table?

Others also agree that this table is made of wood, in the same way, the full expression is "In my limited knowledge and cognition, I think that the approval of others is really approval, and I think that others also agree that this table is wooden." So, this table must be made of wood. ”

Isn't that?

It's just convenient for the characters to enrich themselves, it's just convenient for the characters to create more self-definition, if everyone is entangled in the real issue, how can we carry forward the imperial dream, and how can we promote the construction of a new era of the empire?

It's as if, there's always something very important for the characters to consider. Even though each character cares about things differently, everyone has their own important things. But the consensus is that the question of authenticity seems to be the least important.

Can't you see that everything only exists in your own head? How nonsense did I once be, to believe that there is a world outside, and there are countless people and countless ideas outside.

It seems that there is no need to intervene in that awareness at all, and to be able to describe everything as something in your head. In other words, the perceived elements of the picture do not need to be classified at all, they are all in one group.

There is no need to classify at all, what is called the picture element of "scenery", the picture element called "body", and the picture element called "memory". It's all thinking in the head, and I'm aware of the pictorial element of "thinking".

"I think there's a table here", isn't this thinking?

"I think I'm sitting in KFC and thinking about slashing", isn't that thinking?

Thinking is the element of the picture that is perceived at this moment. Previously, I also believed that objective things are one kind of picture element, and thinking is another picture element. But now it seems that all of it is thinking, and objective things are just another manifestation of thinking.

This should be easy to understand, all the information processing is in the head, so naturally I can only see my own brain, and not anything else.

It is just a guess to think that there is an objective thing, which leads to a vision of an objective thing in the mind. Even, this speculation proves that he can only perceive what is in his head. It's just that there is one more hypothesis, that is, to assume the truth of objective things.

If there are no objective things, how can I perceive objective things? There are many ways to do this, right, any imaginative person can give examples.

Everything in the dream does not exist, including the self in the dream.

But this thinking is not me, although everything is a product of thinking, such as a table is what I realize is that there is a table, and the perception is that I think there is such an opinion. But the awareness of the mind, or "I exist," is real.

That awareness is one with the elements of the picture, and as I said before, there is no such thing as a spectator looking at the elements of the picture. That awareness is everything, and the natural picture elements are also that awareness, and there is no such thing as that awareness, and naturally there will be no role distinction between "theatergoers" and "picture elements".

If the character exists, it must be false.

Yuan Changwen felt the joy in his heart, as if there was a very crucial thing in this place. But no matter how hard you think about it, it seems to be a little bit worse.

What's missing?

Everything is just the result of thinking, so what credibility is there?

Thoughts, pictorial elements, that awareness......

The only pictorial elements I can perceive are thoughts, and the rest of the pictorial elements are just the content of thoughts?

No, it's just a play on words, and the words "thinking", "consciousness", "thinking" are tumbling in my head, as if I want to make something earth-shattering.

I perceive that there is a table, I realize that there is a table, my mind tells me that there is a table, I think there is a table...... That awareness is everything, that consciousness is everything, that awareness is everything......

Yuan Changwen was very uncomfortable, like that didn't pull it clean, obviously he felt that there was still, but he just couldn't pull it out.

That awareness, all the elements of the picture that are only perceived, including thinking, body, scenery, etc., are just the presentation of the elements of the picture.

That consciousness, all that is just the content of awareness, including thinking, body, scenery, and so on, is just the content of awareness.

Aware that the character of Yuan Changwen is thinking, and realize that the character of Yuan Changwen is thinking?

Aware that there is a table here, realize that there is a table here?

Yuan Changwen couldn't react a little, it seemed that something was stuck here. But whatever is stuck here, it's not real. Because what can be stuck in reality? This kind of stuck is itself just a presentation of a pictorial element.

So, what's missing?

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: