What is a madman?

Perhaps, a person who is desperate for one goal is called a madman. Of course, when this goal is more lofty, like starting a business or something, and not doing anything to endanger public safety, it can only be said that this person is more paranoid or focused.

For those scientists, forgetting their families for the sake of their scientific careers, or boiling eggs while thinking about their experiments but boiling their watches. These things are preached from the aspect of praise.

What if a person's goal is self-destruction? Or if it's just a thing that the whole world thinks is very small, and that person is obsessed with it like a madman, and discarding anything else.

This kind of person may be considered crazy.

There are many things that will be defined as big things by everyone, as if when such a big thing happens, other things have to give way. For example, if I can stop and save someone at an existential moment, but I don't want to stop and save someone because I'm playing a mobile game, what will happen?

I'm going to be scolded to death.

Yuan Changwen felt very strange, how could those people be qualified to scold me? How could they be qualified to judge me? And why did they think they were standing from the perspective of the truth?

Those one-sided criticisms, those basic consensuses, are not all wrapped in strong emotions in this way. Even, everyone thinks that their actions are correct, and their words are the truth, "This is how it should be!"

There is no one else at all, all of them are picture elements that I don't know what to call them. Including myself, persuading others, or not persuading others, are the words and deeds of false characters.

It's all untrue.

Yuan Changwen was very uncomfortable, as if something was collapsing. The world is not real, and what do you have to grasp?

The point is, what to catch or what not to catch is the shit of the character, and it is all the picture element that is perceived at the moment. I always think that I have the ability to change the words and actions of my characters, or that I have the ability to influence the occurrence of events.

This illusion is probably the cause of distress.

What happens to the character, whether the character has money or not, whether the character has a woman or not, can I really influence these things? I am always out of the moment, and everything about the character is the past, just a visual element that I perceive at this moment.

The character will be sad, the character will try, the character will laugh, and the character will suffer...... It's my business.

There's nothing I shouldn't do, or I can't do. For example, I shouldn't force others, I shouldn't be angry, I shouldn't be uncomfortable, I shouldn't laugh, etc., it's all.

This kind of pre-setting is all distortion in the mind, and it is all a trade-off based on the distortion in the brain. I think, "I shouldn't force people," but what about when you need to force it? Is it because of a distortion in your mind that prevents this from happening?

Every time we talk about the so-called going with and against the current, there are a few things that need to be emphasized. It looks a bit like a disclaimer, but it's more about clearing your mind.

If we look at the level of picture elements, the character's own observations show that there are indeed flows and counterflows. For example, some states are downstream, and some states are countercurrent.

But from a real point of view, these are all the pictorial elements that are perceived at this moment, and they have all happened and can only happen in this way. In this way, there is no such thing as a downstream or a countercurrent.

Can it be changed?

If the word "change" refers to the various differences between the elements of the picture that we perceive at the moment, then it may be possible to change it. But not as imagined, all this is free, and you can influence all kinds of events yourself.

Yuan Changwen felt the confusion of his thinking, and seemed to be a little unclear.

The point is, I always want to go with the flow. I used to think that there was nothing called going with the flow, but just wishful thinking and believing in the distortion in my head. But once the distortion in the mind is removed, the flow begins to manifest.

It must be noted that this flow itself is merely speculation. I can't prove the existence of flow, any more than I can prove the existence of gravity.

Because there are good things every time after going downstream, or in other words, no so-called bad things happen every time. So I claim that there is a downstream? Or do I claim that a downflow is a good thing?

Too far-fetched.

If downflow refers to a state of mind, then being in the middle of a downstream is really easy. The world is not real, so why put yourself in an uncomfortable state? Those entanglements are just because there are too many things to care about, this wants and that wants, so they will be entangled.

And I don't have the ability to weigh it, or I know it very well in my heart, this kind of trade-off is just a gamble in itself. That's why I'm anxious and entangled.

Resuming the flow is key, because it's not real, so you don't need to care about any specific events at all. Even if you are doing something, what you are doing is not important at all compared to resuming mobility. So, it's important to prioritize the resumption of flows, even if it's a delay in what you're doing.

Because, at all, there is no delay in this statement. In other words, even the delay is not a big deal.

Standing at the level of the character, there will always be problems that cannot be explained, and there will always be various things and various truths, which is very important and that is also very important. Endless indicators, endless choices, how can binary opposing elements have an end.

None of them are real, they are all elements of the picture that are perceived at the moment, and only that awareness is real.

Perhaps, it will be called an escape problem by others. However, in my opinion, there is no problem at all.

All questions are based on distortions in the mind, and what seems to be reasonable is indeed the problem. However, after all, it is only speculation, speculation through the distortion of the mind. Since it is speculation, it is the key to destroy the hypothesis, not to try to solve the speculation.

Is a loved one important? because you can't find a better one? Because if you lose it, you can't get it back?

!

It's not about looking for happiness, it's not about finding comfort, when you know that all these are the elements of the picture that you are aware of, you will naturally get rid of unhappiness and get rid of discomfort. Of course, it doesn't mean that you will be happy or comfortable.

Neither "unhappy" nor "happy", what is that?

Yuan Changwen encountered this situation again, detaching himself from the dualistic elements. It's a pity that he is the character, a limited existence, and from beginning to end he can only guess the situation after transcending the elements of binary opposites. After all, this thinking itself also belongs to duality, so who knows what it will be like after transcending duality.

Still, it's a good situation.

"I don't know" no longer brings confusion and anxiety, but shallow satisfaction.

Seemingly, I shouldn't have known in the first place. ()

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: