What am I panicking about?

Do you want to quickly touch the truth and then declare yourself a cultivator to the outside world? Or do you think that after cultivating to the truth, you will bring completely different superhuman abilities? Or do you think that you finally have the capital to show off?

None of this is under my control, in fact, I can't control anything at all.

I sensed that the character of Yuan Changwen was being killed, so as for how long it would take to touch the truth, these were all set. It's just that the character of Yuan Changwen doesn't know, so he seems flustered.

Assuming that time passes linearly, then everything has already happened, and as an omniscient being, nothing is unexpected or accidental. So, when the character of Yuan Changwen touches the truth, it has already been determined.

So, what am I panicking about?

Only people who are afraid of life are in a hurry, why are they in a hurry? because they are afraid of life.

There is nothing to worry about, nothing to be anxious about, then what I want to get is bound to get. Because the entire universe belongs to me, who would dare to oppose it?!

But then again, if I give me feedback after I make a wish, ten years after the universe, it seems a bit hilarious. It doesn't matter, how do I know when it's best to grant my wishes? Distortion in my head? No kidding, so what the universe has given me is the best.

The premise is that I am not afraid of life and that it flows with it.

Wrong!

Yuan Changwen found a problem that he had overlooked, but this problem was very important. Moreover, my heart was obviously blocked by this question, and I completely lost my previous sense of ease.

Question: Is truth everything?

All inferences are based on the idea that truth is everything, so, is truth everything?

According to the previous inference, if the non-real exists, as opposed to the real, like Tai Chi black and white, then the thing that encapsulates the real and the non-real is the real.

The question is, is it possible that there is no wrapping, that is, the real and the unreal are opposed, and then infinitely extended?

At this moment, although both the real and the unreal have become limitations, this limitation does not need an infinity to wrap it, and the two opposing limitations form the infinity.

Yuan Changwen stopped himself, and it seemed that he couldn't find a reasonable explanation at all. If this doesn't make sense, then everything that follows becomes a joke.

In other words, the killing of so many chapters of his own has become completely useless. Because, if there is no "truth of everything" at all, then this world is not false. The so-called "shit" is completely garbage, and I'm just a piece of shit.

If the real exists, and the "unreal" is also real, then why is the "unreal" still unreal?

it!

The problem is gone, and it's gone. There is no need to answer at all what two limitations require an infinite to wrap around, and what accommodates these two limitations, because "non-real" simply does not exist.

In this way, authenticity is everything.

So, does the truth have to be infinite? Or is it okay to have an infinite number of limitations? For example, our world is real, and the infinite accommodation outside is also real.

Just as a bubble is limited, it is also real, and the infinity that wraps the bubble outside is also real.

No, even if the assumption is limited to the truth, then according to this reasoning, everything is true. The end result is still that "truth is everything" and "non-reality does not exist." ”

So, I can be sure that "I exist," and then the whole inference goes back to where it was before, and that awareness is everything.

Then, contradicting the assumptions, the assumptions are wrong.

So, the truth is infinite.

It's nerve-wracking!

Whether I have a problem with my brain or a in my brain is why I continue to think deeply about these issues.

Unfortunately, these questions are not something I think about on my own initiative, but questions that are blocking my progress. I didn't think about moving forward, so there were no problems, and even if it really felt ridiculous, there were too many things to do. For example, mortgages, families, children, etc.

How can there be time to think about these so-called truths?

Now, I don't take the initiative to think about the truth. The previous state was obviously very relaxed, without the slightest burden, but gradually it became uncomfortable. The discomfort is there, the problem is there, and I can't pretend I don't see it.

After all, I'm an honest person.

It's funny to think about it, everyone is preaching honesty, but they don't need other people's honesty, because honesty means low emotional intelligence, and people with low emotional intelligence don't like it too much. So, they claim to be able to talk or something, but doesn't being able to speak mean lying?

Of course, there are 10,000 ways to explain the difference between high EQ and lying, but the truth is that high EQ either shifts the subject or doesn't tell the truth. Because telling the truth makes people uncomfortable, and high EQ makes people comfortable, so how can it be that people with high EQ are not lying?

Now the situation has become that I am a lazy person. Doing nothing every day, if I used to see me now, I would definitely despise me, "If you don't find something to do when you're so young, what are you doing?!What will you do in the future?!Will you eat?!"

And those questions, I really have to think about them. I couldn't ignore the discomfort in my heart, and there was nothing important to distract me. All this seems to happen involuntarily, and after thinking about it, even if you think about it for a long time, the problem will be destroyed in the end.

In fact, I can't be sure if it was the character of Yuan Changwen who thought about it, or if there was something that put the answer into the mind of the character of Yuan Changwen, and then I noticed it.

I feel this way when I write, and I don't write it myself at all. Because many plots were not arranged by me, many scenes that I thought were touching, and many words that I felt shocking were not designed by me from the beginning. Rather, it was written, and it came out on its own.

Can I say I wrote it?

The plot flows on its own, and if an author says this before I write it, I will only take it as a self-praise to elevate writing to the level of art. But in fact, it's really like this, how did so many things that made the plot go out of shape and made the plot out of control?

If the plot can't flow on its own, then how can it get out of control? And this flow, in my opinion, was a bad phenomenon. Because this causes the text to go out of the outline and the plot is completely deflected.

However, how can I be sure that the distortion in my head, the artificially set outline, will be better than the flow of the plot itself? Is it just judged by what income? So, it is also a distortion in the mind, what are other people?

In this case, the role of Yuan Changwen really has nothing to do with me, and that thinking is also just a product of awareness. How do I know how this thinking will manifest itself in the future?

Maybe it's bad, maybe it's bad, who knows?