Yuan Changwen felt some kind of empty discomfort, not like the previous discomfort, and he wanted to commit suicide.

The state at the moment is a bit like doing nothing, but it is not boring with nothing.

I'm always looking at the map, and I'm always trying to be like a teacher. And this so-called "teacher-like person" is simply imitating the teacher's words and deeds, that is, he wants the role of Yuan Changwen to become a teacher-like role.

It's all a parody of a character.

The teacher is light on everything, so I should be light on everything. If I don't do something that the teacher shows, then I doubt myself.

It's hilarious!

All of these things are attributes of the character, whether the character is a good person or a bad person, whether the character is kind or cruel, whether the character is merciful or complaining, and so on.

Real is real, and the characters belong to the false, to the things that do not exist. What's the use of imitating the teacher's words and deeds? If you think about it, even if I touch the real thing in the end, will the character behave exactly like the teacher?

The teacher likes to eat dumplings, can't I like to eat hot pot?

If these things can be different, then who will judge what things must be the same, who will judge how the person who touches the real thing should behave? the classic books, or the so-called teachings of the sects, or the legends?

Did the Buddha do the same thing as Jesus, and how did Lao Tzu act?

None of this matters, maybe there will be some common states when you touch the reality, but I don't know what those common states are. So, I don't have any reason to pretend I know. No matter how authoritative people claim, not even a teacher can describe that state in detail.

What's more, even if it is described in detail, I can't believe it. Because of my honesty, these things are a guess to me.

Killing, you don't need to care about the words and deeds of the characters at all.

Of course, this can be problematic in the early stages of the killing. For example, if I don't care about what the character says or does, then I can not kill at all, or rather, I can kill while grasping self-definition.

It's funny, and it seems that he has already passed the early stage of killing, and has come to the so-called middle and late stages. How do I know this? Isn't this wishful thinking?

There is no need to rely on the teacher, if there must be a teacher to touch the truth, then how does the first person to touch the truth do it? If someone can do it, why can't they do it?

The blood that Yuan Changwen had just ignited was instantly extinguished by himself.

Because the characters are set, some people need a teacher to touch the truth, and some people don't need a teacher. Some people can stand at the pinnacle of life, some people can only be at the bottom of society, some people can reach the upper echelons of society through struggle, and some people will go bankrupt and become passers-by.

What's wrong with these?

The character of Yuan Changwen is set to never touch the truth, is there anything wrong?

Similarly, the word "setting" is based on the assumption that time passes linearly. It's as if it's been set up, and then it's played from beginning to end, so the whole life unfolds like a picture scroll.

At this moment, I am aware of the pictorial elements about how my past happened. These things are just a state of "things can only be done this way". Even though I don't know how these false things came about, or how that awareness conjured them up, they already exist.

The existence of the unreal, the existence of the false, because the real cannot be manifested in this false world, so what is real?

No.

I am aware of the memories in my head that show how I chose in the past, how I grew up in the past, what I went through in the past, and so on. These are the things that are set, and once the time is removed, I don't know if the past is real.

And now I realize that these elements of the picture are not predetermined, because I don't know why I am aware of these things at this moment, and I don't know why these things are perceived by me.

Even if you admit the linear passage of time, the characters are still set things up, and no one can deny fatalism.

Yuan Changwen found that he was starting to be funny again, why should he admit the linear passage of time? Why should he admit that time is just like we understand, from the past to the future? This kind of "even if...... It's still ......", who is it talking about?

I couldn't stand there and speak, and when I reacted, "I'm saying this right now," I was done. What is perceived is always the memory in the head.

And these memories, who knows what's going on?

There are no words at this moment, there is no thinking at this moment, everything is still at this moment. And it is this lack of doubt about the memories in the head that makes the whole world seem so real.

The movement of the characters, the dialogue, the struggle for the goal, these things will become possible.

Is it possible that this false world works according to the linear passage of time?

I don't know, but it's only possible. If you can't be sure, you should have an attitude that you can't be sure. If I don't know this, why do I always believe in the linear passage of time?

And time itself does not exist, because time is not infinite, it is not real. Well, the unreal doesn't exist, so these are just an illusion.

Just like I always think that I am the character of Yuan Changwen, it is also a very clever illusion. If the world is full of holes like a garbage game, who is going to pursue the pinnacle of life?

At this moment, I am aware that the memory of the relevant content in my mind simply does not know how to appear, and it has appeared. Even though I don't believe I've experienced these things, the memories in my head are so domineering there.

So, what's wrong? The past doesn't exist at all, so what's wrong? Everything is what is perceived at the moment, what's wrong?

It's like a painting of someone slaughtering a village, what's wrong, what's wrong, what's wrong?

Is it someone who can't slaughter a village? Is someone someone who shouldn't be slaughtered?

However, these things have already been presented and drawn, is there anything wrong?

I don't know if it's like the visual element that I perceived, someone from birth to adulthood, walked into the village from outside the village, and then started slaughtering the village. I have no way of knowing.

In other words, these things are also the pictorial elements that are perceived at the moment.

There's no one outside the screen!