The characters are not real, the world is not real, and that reality will not be manifested in this world.

Even if he really touches the truth in the end, the character of Yuan Changwen is still a false existence.

So, what exactly are I for? No one has ever told me that honesty is so terrible. The next time you hear someone say something honest or something, think about my state and you'll know what honesty is.

Yuan Changwen felt his state, and it was obvious that that weird feeling had disappeared. I feel like I'm back to the past, the state of fully identifying with the role. The only difference may be simply the realization that you are not the character.

I'm not going to say anything about being pulled back, and I'm not going to see it as a sign of stagnation, or a sign of progress. After all, how do I know if I'm moving forward or going in circles?

If I'm done, I'll probably be able to own the whole map and see if I've gone around in circles.

On the other hand, isn't the future of Yuan Changwen's role a certainty? No matter whether I work hard to kill or give up in the future, which one is not inevitable and which one is not fate?

How many times do you have to emphasize yourself to wake up that the character is false and simply does not exist. Thinking is also false, and there is no such thing as controlling thinking at all.

The illusion of controlling the mind is based entirely on the correctness of memory. I remember thinking about apples, and now I'm thinking about apples, and I'm claiming that I can control my mind.

In addition, there is no such thing as "now I am thinking about apples", because thinking itself is based on the linear passage of time. Once time is removed, what is the moment, what is the moment, what is the moment, where is the thinking?

If thinking doesn't even exist, how can there be any control thinking?

It's not about thinking about what you should be like in the future, but about what you do is the future. It's not about choosing the future, it's about being the future.

There's no need to choose to weigh up, I can only do this. The seemingly endless possibilities of the choice are merely adding color to this orchestrated dream.

So, why do you want to kill it? There's no why, because that's all I have to do. Why, then, do you not want to kill at this moment? Again, there is no reason, because I can only do this.

There is no hesitation and no trade-off, and even when you hesitate and weigh yourself, this behavior is also because you can only do this. I can only hesitate, I can only weigh, this is my role.

The paradox is that idleness is considered bad, nothing is considered bad, and laziness is considered bad.

That's why most people denigrate fatalism or use it as a placebo for trying and failing.

If the character's behavior is all set, then why should you work hard?

The fundamental assumption of this question is that it is a bad thing to think that being lazy all your life is a bad thing, a wrong thing. That's why I asked this question. Subconsciously thinks that a person can't live a life of laziness and confusion, so he desperately denies fatalism and wants to find his own future.

If, I think, the character can spend his life lazily and do nothing. Then, when I hear that the character's behavior is set, I don't have any resistance at all. Because the character's behavior is set, then even if I keep lazy, there will be no problem.

Because the script won't let you get the bento so early, something will definitely happen to ensure your survival. Even if you die, it's just the death of the character, and it's not a big deal.

Moreover, the behavior of the characters is set, and this fatalism will only make people relaxed, so why is it disgusting?

I can do whatever I want, because it's fate, because it's all set. So, I don't need to look for the best option, and I don't need to go to a fortune teller to see what I should do next.

My words and actions are the best choice, because it is the only choice. My idea is the best idea because that's the only idea.

It sounds a bit like listening to the heartbeat without hindering it. But in fact, there is no obstacle at all, because the so-called obstacle itself is the only option, and the so-called obstacle is also the only thing that will happen.

There is no need to dwell on your choices and the future at all, and even when you are struggling, you must understand that this entanglement itself must be entangled, because this is the setting of the role. So, after understanding that this entanglement is the character setting, how tangled will it be?

On the other hand, there is no reason to claim that this must be a good thing. Just like in the previous example, everything went smoothly and there was a car accident. The green light, just passing, and there is no obstacle, and then the car accident happened smoothly.

Is there anything wrong with that? There's no evidence that the so-called flow has to be done according to the character's idea. And the nonsense is that often when you think like this, the so-called downstream will bring super good luck.

That's how it doesn't make sense.

Striving to be "inactive" is itself "promising". When you don't even want to do "inaction" anymore, it's time to achieve "inaction".

Strive to be "fearless" and strive to be "non-attachment", these are the same principles.

Because these things are not something that can be done by hard work at all, they are often things that you will naturally get after you reach a certain realm.

Just like righteousness and courage, I have never heard of imitating the words and deeds of righteous and courageous people, and you can claim that you are also righteous and courageous. And when you really act bravely, then your words and deeds are in line with the words and deeds of those who are righteous and courageous.

Therefore, even if it is written into a book "Teach You How to Be Righteous and Courageous", no matter how thoroughly it is analyzed, it will be eaten and, what words to drink and reprimand bad people, what hands to save people, what is the left foot or right foot first, what is the distance from the bad guys, and what emotions should be maintained......

Isn't this!

The characters are not real, and I always subconsciously want the characters to have a better life, which is why I always feel conflicted and uncomfortable.

It's obviously killing falsehoods, but it's always changing concepts to discuss whether there's meaning or not, or thinking about how these things can be used in life.

Even if it was understood many chapters ago that the killing was destroying life, it was only understood. It's like a bunch of esoteric chemical terms, and it's just a matter of understanding these words.

Every time I think about it, I have nothing to kill. But then, there will always be more realizations. Then, look at your previous self and don't understand why you didn't see something so simple.

At the moment, I felt that there was nothing to kill. Perhaps, the next moment, he will laugh at himself. Just like me at the moment, laughing at my previous self. ()

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: