Too many things, too many noises, and my head is full of stuff that I don't even know about.

The brain is not a space for me to store something. It's that I'm stored in my brain, and I'm just something born out of all sorts of clutter in my brain.

There is no deception, it's all just the presentation of picture elements. Showing my belief, showing me being deceived. There's no such thing as a true self, and then some of the visual elements unfold to mislead me, which is not the case.

None of this has anything to do with reality, and it's not up to my mind to decide whether or not I finish the killing. It's just that some things seem to be achievable through behavior.

For example, exercise, through daily perseverance and sweat, to increase muscle tone.

The paradox is that every time I think of "whether I finish the kill or not, it is not up to the mind to decide", which means that "whether I finish the kill or not is actually determined by the presentation of the elements of the picture".

Then, the distortion in my mind is subtly related and misleading, since it is not up to my efforts to determine whether or not I will kill or not, then why should I try to kill?

.

This is actually saying that my slash completion is just a presentation of the picture elements, so it is possible that the slash can be completed without slashing. It's all a representation of the elements of the picture, and it has nothing to do with whether or not I try to kill it.

But how do I know that I can kill without slashing?

In the same way, I don't know, I can do it if I try to slash.

It's just a slash.

This is very similar to the sentence, "Hard work will not necessarily succeed, and if you don't work hard, you will definitely not succeed", but unfortunately, the second half of the sentence is still an unfounded affirmation.

In fact, I don't know the relationship between "hard work", "no hard work" and success, there is no relationship at all.

No matter how I describe the relationship between "hard work", "no hard work" and success, as long as it becomes an affirmative sentence, then it is nonsense. Only not knowing, perhaps, not being sure is an honest answer.

And this honest answer is equivalent to saying nothing. "Hard work does not necessarily lead to success, and if you don't work hard, you may not succeed", what is the difference between this and not saying nothing?

No one likes that answer, at least not for me. Knowledge is needed, affirmations are needed, even if I know that these affirmations are not necessarily true, but emotions will overshadow them, and then hold on to something.

This affirmative sentence becomes the cornerstone of the fullness of the character, making the character more fullness and real.

So, does it have to be killed? Can a kill really lead to a kill?

The strange thing is that even if you stop slashing, the kind of "presentation of everything is a picture element" becomes a slash in itself. As long as I think of this sentence, those baseless affirmations will no longer have a chance to be arrogant. Even if I deny the slashing, the statement of denying the plump characters, is still killing.

When I took some falsehood as true, I should have killed it, and I should have seen how I took the falsehood as the truth. However, there is no causal relationship, so I can't be sure why I would mistake the false as the real one.

Rather, it's a direct representation of the elements of the picture. Since there is no causal relationship, it is impossible to kill "why falsehood is true" or "how to treat falsehood as truth".

However, even if I don't kill it, when I take the false as the real, "everything is the presentation of the elements of the picture" is still killing. Because of this sentence, I will no longer continue to treat the real thing as real, because all this is just the presentation of the picture elements.

For example, yesterday I had dinner, it was very real, and this feeling was very real, and there were unwashed dishes and leftovers as proof. Even if I don't kill it, "everything is a presentation of picture elements" will destroy the authenticity, and only the picture element of "I think yesterday's dinner was real".

Do I still think that last night's dinner is real? I know that realism is just the presentation of the elements of the picture, how long can that realism be real? And what's the difference between that and slashing?

Yuan Changwen felt a little inexplicable, he tried hard to kill himself, and he was crazy about killing, but it turned out that he was killing no matter what?

And I am also part of the elements of the picture, and the so-called presentation also includes my words and deeds.

Everything is the presentation of picture elements, and success has nothing to do with hard work. The paradox is that why should I work hard? The assumption of this question is that I can succeed without trying. And, thinking that this assumption is absurd, hence this rhetorical question.

You can't succeed without hard work, and that seems to be in my blood. But is this true? Are you lucky enough to not think you're working hard at all, and then you just do the right thing at the right time in the right place, and you succeed?

I always wanted to do something, and I thought I could do it. Is this fundamentally different from other beliefs? Belief in meditation, belief in meditation, belief in precepts and so on, it's all.

Obviously, I had a firm grip on slashing, and I felt uncomfortable at the mention that I didn't need to slash or that slashing was useless. And, with all the efforts to prove it, it is actually necessary to kill.

.

I deny this kind of grasping, which is obviously exactly the same as the panic when I kill filial piety and kill my career. Why is it that when it comes to slashing, do you think there is a difference?

Dishonest.

It's still a twist in my head, and I'm still firmly in control of this shit. In other words, it presents the picture element of "I am controlled by the distortion in my head".

I can't do anything about anything, everything has nothing to do with thinking. The same goes for slashing, whether it's completed or not has nothing to do with slashing. It's just that at this moment, the picture element presents "I came to this position by slashing, and I cleaned up the distortion in my brain through slashing." ”

I'm still far from it.

Yuan Changwen always felt that he was about to finish the killing, on the one hand, it was an unbelievable sense of ease, on the other hand, it was dark and real, and he really couldn't find anything to kill.

Now, the slash itself is here, and I don't dare to discard the slash for fear that I won't be able to complete it. Whether the killing is complete or not has nothing to do with whether I continue to kill or not, it's just that the emotional pull makes me think it has something to do with it.

It has nothing to do with behavior, whether I kill or not does not affect whether I get rid of my fear. When I want to get rid of fear, any behavior becomes, because the root is fear.

It's not real, it's still pestering me, but there's nothing I can do about it. I thought I could kill before, and I could see clearly how I could catch the false, so that the unreal was in the position of the unreal.

But now, can I really do it? ()

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: